CACN-1 is required in the Caenorhabditis elegans somatic gonad for proper oocyte development.

Alyssa D. Cecchetelli,Julie Hugunin,Hiba Tannoury,Erin J. Cram

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.03.028

IF: 3.148

2016-06-01

Developmental Biology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The skinny on skin: The role of skin-aware professionals in skin cancer surveillance

Kyra Diehl,Jacob Nelson,Olivia Haddadin,Elizabeth Stoos,Autumn Shafer,Amy Mason,Deb Girard,Theresa Malcolm,Alan C Geller,Emile Latour,Elizabeth Bailey,Jade N Young,Hannah Zhao,Jordan Gillespie,Hailey Pfeifer,Claudia Lee,Moira Shea,Mallory DeCampos-Stairiker,Jake Smith,Alyssa Becker,Gina N Bash,Vikram Sahni,Yichen Fan,Elena Paz Munoz,David Baron,Nadia Popovici,Victoria E Orfaly,Wenelia Baghoomian,Emilie Foltz,Kristen Kahlen,Stephanie Savory,Heidi Jacobe,Sancy A Leachman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.16536

2024-09-01

Abstract:Licensed nonmedical, skin-aware professionals (e.g., hairdressers, massage therapists, etc.) have the potential to identify skin cancer, but baseline knowledge may not be sufficient to accomplish this goal. Following educational intervention, self-efficacy is one of the best surrogate metrics for behavior change. Curricula that increase knowledge and confidence levels can improve screening behaviors, but few have been tested for efficacy in this population AIMS: We assessed whether an online curriculum could reliably improve skin screening knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of nonmedical professionals PATIENTS/METHODS: Skin-aware professionals were recruited through the Oregon Health Authority and IMPACT Melanoma TM. Participants completed a pre-survey, online training module, post-survey, and one-year follow-up survey. We evaluated participants' indicated levels of concern for suspicious and nonsuspicious lesions relative to "gold standard" physician ratings. We also assessed confidence and self-reported behavior change regarding talking to clients about skin cancer and recommending they see a provider to evaluate suspicious lesions RESULTS: The pre-survey was completed by 9872 skin-aware professionals; 5434 completed the post-survey, and 162 completed the one-year follow-up survey. Participants showed a significant improvement in ability to indicate the correct level of concern for all lesion types in concordance with "gold standard" physician ratings (p < 0.001). Participants reported increased comfort levels in discussing health-related topics with their clients posttraining CONCLUSIONS: Our training module effectively increased skin-aware professionals' knowledge, confidence, and concern for malignant lesions. Skin-aware professionals may serve as a valuable extension of the skin self-exam, but additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these curricula long-term, including potential downstream consequences.
Melanoma Detection by Non-Specialists: An Untapped Potential for Triage?

Carmen Cantisani,Luca Ambrosio,Carlotta Cucchi,Fanni Adél Meznerics,Norbert Kiss,András Bánvölgyi,Federica Rega,Flavia Grignaffini,Francesco Barbuto,Fabrizio Frezza,Giovanni Pellacani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112821

IF: 3.6

2022-11-17

Diagnostics

Abstract:Introduction: The incidence of melanoma increased considerably in recent decades, representing a significant public health problem. We aimed to evaluate the ability of non-specialists for the preliminary screening of skin lesions to identify melanoma-suspect lesions. Materials and Methods: A medical student and a dermatologist specialist examined the total body scans of 50 patients. Results: The agreement between the expert and the non-specialist was 87.75% (κ = 0.65) regarding the assessment of clinical significance. The four parameters of the ABCD rule were evaluated on the 129 lesions rated as clinically significant by both observers. Asymmetry was evaluated similarly in 79.9% (κ = 0.59), irregular borders in 74.4% (κ = 0.50), color in 81.4% (κ = 0.57), and diameter in 89.9% (κ = 0.77) of the cases. The concordance of the two groups was 96.9% (κ = 0.83) in the case of the detection of the Ugly Duckling Sign. Conclusions: Although the involvement of GPs is part of routine care worldwide, emphasizing the importance of educating medical students and general practitioners is crucial, as many European countries lack structured melanoma screening training programs targeting non-dermatologists.

medicine, general & internal
Skin Cancer Referrals by Non-Medical Practitioners: A Prospective Observational Study

Alexander D G Anderson,Sarah Carswell,Harry Heath,James Koutsis,Pascale Guitera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae115

2024-03-29

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Abstract:Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of suspected skin cancer referrals made by non-medical practitioners (NMPs) and compare this to referrals made by local General Practitioners (GPs). Data were collected prospectively from patients referred to a UK hospital dermatology department from primary care. The profession of the referrer was ascertained from review of referral letters and direct questioning. Patient records and subsequent histology reports were reviewed to determine ultimate diagnosis. 668/753 patients (88.7%) were referred by GPs versus 85/753 (11.3%) by NMPs. 340/668 (50.1%) of patients in the GP group and 47/85 (55.3%) in the NMP group were discharged without intervention (p = 0.45). An ultimate diagnosis of skin malignancy was made in 196/668 (29.3%) patients in the GP and 25/85 (29.4%)) in the NMP group (p = 0.99). These early data suggest significant potential for NMPs to become more involved in skin lesion assessment.

dermatology
Analysis of early diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Slovenia

Mateja Kokalj Kokot,Spela Mirosevic,Nika Bric,Davorina Petek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0046

2024-10-04

Abstract:Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent male malignancy globally. Prolonged diagnostic intervals are associated with poorer outcomes, emphasizing the need to optimize this process. This study aimed to evaluate the doctor and primary care interval, research their impact on patient survival and explore opportunities to improve PCa diagnostic pathway in primary care. Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study using cancer patients' anonymised primary care data and data of the Slovenian Cancer Registry. Results: The study found that the doctor interval had a median duration of 0 days (interquartile range ([IQR] 0-6) and primary care interval a median duration of 5 days (IQR 0-58). Longer intervals were observed in patients with more than two comorbidities, where general practitioners didn't have access to laboratory diagnostic tests within their primary health care centre and when patients first presented with symptoms (reported symptoms at first presentation: dysuria, lower urinary tract symptoms [LUTS], abdominal pain). The analysis also revealed a statistically significant association between lower 5-year survival rate and the accessibility of laboratory and ultrasound diagnostics in primary healthcare centres and a shorter 5-year survival of symptomatic patients in comparison to patients who were identified by elevated levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA). Conclusions: This study shows that treating suspected PCa in primary care has a significant impact on 5-year survival. Several factors contribute to better survival, including easy access to laboratory and abdominal ultrasound in primary care centres. The study highlights the complex array of factors shaping PCa diagnosis, beyond individual clinicians' skills, encompassing test and service availability.
The effect of a dermoscopy training program on the diagnostic accuracy and management decisions regarding pigmented skin lesions: A comparison between dermal clinicians and general practitioners

Amber H J Barten,Cornelis P Beyers,Mark F R Vondenhoff,Lampros Stergioulas,Nicole A Kukutsch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llad441

2024-01-12

Clinical and Experimental Dermatology

Abstract:Abstract Background Dermoscopy is known to increase the diagnostic accuracy of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) when used by trained professionals. The effect of dermoscopy training on the diagnostic ability of dermal clinicians has not been studied so far. Objectives This study aimed to investigate whether dermal clinicians (DCs) in comparison to general practitioners (GPs) benefitted from a training program including dermoscopy, in both their ability to differentiate between different forms of PSLs and to assign the correct therapeutic strategy. Methods In total, 24 DCs and 96 GPs attended a training program about PSLs. The diagnostic skills as well as the therapeutic strategy were assessed, prior to the training (pre-test) and then after the training (post-test) using clinical images only, as well as after the addition of dermoscopic images (integrated post-test). Bayesian hypothesis testing was used to determine the statistical significance. Results Both the DCs as well as the GPs benefitted from the training with the median proportion correctly diagnosed PSLs, 73% GPs and 63% DCs, at the integrated post-test. A statistically significant difference between the pre-test results and the integrated test results was seen with a Bayes factor larger than 100. With 12 percentage points higher, the GPs outperformed the DCs in the accuracy of detecting the PSLs. Conclusions The study shows that a training program focussing on PSLs positively impacts the detection of PSLs by DCs and GPs. This training program could form an integral part in the training of DCs in screening procedures, although additional research is needed.

dermatology
The Role of Digital Dermoscopy and Follow-Up in the Detection of Amelanotic/Hypomelanotic Melanoma in a Group of High-Risk Patients—Is It Useful?

Ružica Jurakić Tončić,Lara Vasari,Daška Štulhofer Buzina,Daniela Ledić Drvar,Mikela Petković,Romana Čeović

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14091200

2024-09-23

Life

Abstract:The prognosis, outcome, and overall survival of melanoma patients improve with early diagnosis which has been facilitated in the past few decades with the introduction of dermoscopy. Further advancements in dermoscopic research, coupled with skilled, educated dermatologists in dermoscopy, have contributed to timely diagnoses. However, detecting amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma remains a challenge even to the most skilled experts because these melanomas can mimic inflammatory diseases, numerous benign lesions, and non-melanoma skin cancers. The list of the possible differential diagnoses can be long. Melanoma prediction without the pigment relies only on vascular criteria, and all classic dermoscopic algorithms have failed to fulfill our expectations. In fact, the diagnosis of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanomas is very challenging, which is why every tool in detecting these lesions is of significance. This review aims to explore the current knowledge and the literature on the possibility of detecting amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanomas using sequential monitoring with digital dermoscopy and total body skin photography.

biology
Fixing TIM : Identifying Functional Mutations in Protein Families through the Interactive Exploration of Sequence and Structural Data

John E. Wenskovitch,T. Luciani,Koonwah Chen,G. Marai

Abstract:We present the design and implementation of a visual mining and analysis tool to help identify protein mutations across family structural models, and to help discover the effect of these mutations on protein function. We follow a client-server approach in which distributed data sources for 3D structure and non-spatial sequence information are seamlessly integrated into a common visual interface. Multiple linked views and a computational backbone allow comparison at the molecular and atomic levels, while a trend-image visual abstraction allows for the sorting and mining of large collections of sequences and of their residues. We evaluate our tool on the triosephosphate isomerase (TIM) family structural models and sequence data, and show that our tool provides an effective, scalable way to navigate a family of proteins, as well as a means to inspect the structure and sequence of individual proteins.
Exploring the feasibility of an artificial intelligence based clinical decision support system for cutaneous melanoma detection in primary care – a mixed method study

Jonatan Helenason,Christoffer Ekström,Magnus Falk,Panagiotis Papachristou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2023.2283190

2023-11-22

Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Abstract:Objective: Skin examination to detect cutaneous melanomas is commonly performed in primary care. In recent years, clinical decision support systems (CDSS) based on artificial intelligence (AI) have been introduced within several diagnostic fields. Setting: This study employs a variety of qualitative and quantitative methodologies to investigate the feasibility of an AI-based CDSS to detect cutaneous melanoma in primary care. Subjects and Design: Fifteen primary care physicians (PCPs) underwent near-live simulations using the CDSS on a simulated patient, and subsequent individual semi-structured interviews were explored with a hybrid thematic analysis approach. Additionally, twenty-five PCPs performed a reader study (diagnostic assessment on the basis of image interpretation) of 18 dermoscopic images, both with and without help from AI, investigating the value of adding AI support to a PCPs decision. Perceived instrument usability was rated on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: From the interviews, the importance of trust in the CDSS emerged as a central concern. Scientific evidence supporting sufficient diagnostic accuracy of the CDSS was expressed as an important factor that could increase trust. Access to AI decision support when evaluating dermoscopic images proved valuable as it formally increased the physician's diagnostic accuracy. A mean SUS score of 84.8, corresponding to 'good' usability, was measured. Conclusion: AI-based CDSS might play an important future role in cutaneous melanoma diagnostics, provided sufficient evidence of diagnostic accuracy and usability supporting its trustworthiness among the users. Effective primary care is important for discovering cutaneous melanoma, the deadliest and an increasingly prevalent form of skin cancer.

medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services,primary health care
Educational Interventions to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Diagnostic Skin Cancer Examinations: A Systematic Literature Review

Eliza L. Posada,Kyle C. Lauck,Tiffaney Tran,Kate J. Krause,Kelly C. Nelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02118-8

2022-01-18

Journal of Cancer Education

Abstract:To our knowledge, there is no available standardized educational curriculum designed to promote the incorporation of skin cancer examinations and procedures into general practice. To explore the contemporary training landscape, we conducted a systematic review of educational interventions designed to support skin cancer diagnostic examinations by primary care providers (PCPs). Our review uniquely encompasses all PCPs, including practicing physicians, residents, and advanced practice practitioners (APPs). The objective of this study is to review and synthesize worldwide data on educational interventions addressing PCP performance of skin cancer diagnostic examinations. A systematic review was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus for English language articles worldwide published from 2000 onwards. Articles were screened for eligibility, and possibly overlapping datasets were resolved. Data extracted included curriculum content, delivery format, and educational outcomes. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 63 studies were selected for data inclusion with one addressing training for resident physicians, 4 for APPs, and the remainder for practicing physicians. Educational interventions included in this review reflect the pre-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic educational environment: half provided live/synchronous instruction of about 5-h duration on average, and a quarter featured interactive components. Less than a quarter of interventions included practice change as a specific reported outcome. Without sustainable practice change, the anticipated long-term benefits of early cancer detection in patients remain limited. Previous and existing educational interventions designed to support skin cancer detection by PCPs demonstrate heterogeneous curriculum content, delivery methods, and educational outcomes. An ideal intervention would teach consensus-derived clinical competencies, provide meaningful learner feedback, and measure outcomes, such as knowledge/competency, confidence/attitudes, and practice change, using validated instruments.

oncology,public, environmental & occupational health,education, scientific disciplines
The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment.

J. Simon,L. Doederlein,Andrew S. McIntosh,D. Metaxiotis,Hans Bock,Sebastian Wolf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GAITPOST.2005.07.003

IF: 2.746

2006-06-01

Gait & Posture

Abstract:
P023 Real-world melanoma miss rate in an NHS hospital dermatology service

Hafsa Faarax Shirwac,Hannah Morgan,Huw Greenish,Sarah Carswell,Harry Heath,James Koutsis,Pascale Guitera,Alexander D G Anderson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.050

IF: 11.113

2024-06-28

British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract:Abstract The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the ‘miss rate’ of dermatology clinicians for detecting malignant melanoma among patients referred on the 2-week-wait skin cancer pathway over a 2-year period. We reviewed patient records from the previous 5 years to identify instances where malignant melanoma might have been misdiagnosed. Malignant melanoma can be missed at various stages of the patient’s journey, leading to delayed diagnosis and potentially serious consequences. Our geographically isolated rural county relies exclusively on a single NHS dermatology department for 2-week-wait skin cancer services, providing a unique opportunity to assess the incidence of missed melanoma. We used a regional cancer registry to identify all primary invasive malignant melanomas (ICD-10 C43) diagnosed between August 2020 and July 2022. Records of any patient who had attended the dermatology department within the 5 years preceding diagnosis were reviewed to identify patients where melanoma might have been previously misdiagnosed. In total, 432 primary melanomas were identified. The male-to-female ratio was 202 : 230 and the median age was 71 years (interquartile range 57–79). Stage at presentation was IA (176, 40.7%), IB (98, 22.7%), II (134, 31.0%), III (19, 4.4%) and IV (5, 1.2%). Nine patients (2.1%) had been given an erroneous benign diagnosis for the same lesion and discharged within 13 months of diagnosis (missed melanoma). The stages of the missed melanomas were IA (two patients), IB (four patients) and II (three patients). In a further four cases (0.9%) the melanoma had prompted action, but the diagnosis was delayed; one had an erroneous negative biopsy, one missed an urgent review, one lesion was monitored, leading to a 6-month delay in diagnosis, and one was incorrectly diagnosed as a basal cell carcinoma, leading to a delay in surgery. A final four (0.9%) cases were diagnosed as benign more than 2 years prior to melanoma diagnosis. These were classified as ‘possible’ misses, as they could have evolved into malignant melanomas in the interim period. Our study reveals a low yet quantifiable melanoma miss rate in a high-volume NHS dermatology service. Future multicentre studies with large datasets are required, to identify risk factors for misdiagnosis. Clinicians managing skin lesion clinics may consider melanoma miss rate as a key performance metric. Strategies to improve the accuracy of this important metric might include the use of prospective databases incorporating digital images of lesions suspected to be benign. The utility of this approach should be investigated further.

dermatology
P024 Skin cancer referrals by nonmedical practitioners: a prospective observational study

Alexander D G Anderson,Sarah Carswell,Harry Heath,James Koutsis,Pascale Guitera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.051

IF: 11.113

2024-06-28

British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract:Abstract A shortage of general practitioners (GPs) and increasing healthcare burden have led to nonmedical practitioners (NMPs) assuming new roles in many countries. It is now commonplace in the UK for nurses, paramedics and other NMPs to refer patients to secondary care. Despite this, there is little real-world information regarding clinical performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of skin cancer referrals made by NMPs and to compare this with referrals made by local GPs. Data were collected prospectively from patients referred to an NHS hospital dermatology department with a skin lesion of concern on the ‘2-week-wait’ pathway during a 2-month period in 2022. The profession of the referrer was ascertained from review of referral letters, from direct questioning of each patient and by contacting the GP surgery if required. Patient records and subsequent histology reports were reviewed to determine ultimate diagnosis. The proportion of patients diagnosed with skin malignancy (malignant melanoma, malignant melanoma in situ, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, rare skin cancer) and in whom the dermatology clinician arranged an intervention (biopsy, excision, referral to another specialty for treatment) were recorded. In total, 753 patients were included. The overall malignancy rate was 29.3%. Overall, 668 of 753 patients (88.7%) were referred by a GP vs. 85 of 753 (11.3%) by an NMP. Seventy-two of the NMP referrals were made by 47 named individuals. The remaining 13 were made by unnamed practice nurses. Patients recalled an NMP asking for a second opinion in only 15 of 85 cases (18%) cases. Overall, 73% of NMP referrals were made by nurses, 24% by paramedics and 4% by physicians associates. Following clinic visit, 340 of 668 patients (50.9%) in the GP group and 47 of 85 (55%) in the NMP group were discharged without intervention (P = 0.45). An ultimate diagnosis of skin malignancy was made in 196 of 668 patients (29.3%) in the GP group and 25 of 85 (29%) in the NMP group (P = 0.99). Over 10% of referrals on the suspected skin cancer pathway were made by NMPs. There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy (number of malignancies) or referral appropriateness (referrals resulting in intervention) between NMPs and GPs. These early data suggest significant potential for NMPs to become more involved in skin lesion assessment. Further work should focus on understanding successful NMP education and supervision strategies and result in standardization and accreditation of training pathways for this increasingly important cohort of referrers.

dermatology
[Recognition and initial management of melanoma by general practitioners: A survey in a rural French area with low medical density]

Valérie Zimmerlé,Emeline Laurent,Valérie Tauveron,Annabel Maruani,Emmanuelle Le Bidre,Mahtab Samimi,Laurent Machet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2017.11.024

Abstract:Introduction: Cutaneous cancers are very common, easily visible on skin. The general practitioner (GP) is in the front line to manage the lesions. He has to recognize malignancy and refer most often to the specialist for excision, or consider that the lesion is benign and in ambiguous cases, offer clinical monitoring. The current low medical density in the Centre Val de Loire area makes access to general practitioners (GP) and dermatologists harder. The aim of this study was to evaluate GPs' everyday practice in cutaneous cancers screening in general, and particularly in melanoma screening, in a rural region of France. Methods: We sent a questionnaire on November 24th 2015 to all GPs of the Cher department (204 questionnaires), to assess their knowledge and practice of melanoma. The questionnaire comprised 2 parts: the first part was composed of 23 items with a majority of questions focused on melanoma and the second part consisted of clinical cases including 5 benign cutaneous tumors, 4 melanomas and 1 pigmented basal cell carcinoma. GP's were asked to answer in each case: diagnosis, degree of certainty (from 0 to 10), practical attitude (excision, referral to dermatologist or surgeon or surveillance). Their answers were anonymous. The primary endpoint was whether medical decision regarding each case was appropriate, i.e. removal of malignant lesion or referral for removal, and reassurance or surveillance in benign lesions. Results: The response rate was 35% (72 responses). Thirty-eight GPs (53%) had an appropriate management facing the 5 malignant lesions, 18 GP (25%) had an appropriate management in 4 out of 5 cases. The ABCDE rule was known by 58% of responders, the ugly duckling sign of 19%. GPs did not feel comfortable with melanoma: on a growing scale (from 0=not comfortable at all to 10=very comfortable) the average was 4.2 with a median at 5 (range 0-10). They expressed a strong need for training on this topic: on a scale increasing from 0 to 10, the average was 7.9 for a median to 8 (range 3-10). Knowledge about melanoma risk factors, and the level of ease dealing with screening of melanoma was not significantly associated with a better management. The main difficulties were lack of time and the increasing difficulty of access to dermatologist. Fast and easy access by teledermatology was solicited by 89% of GPs. Conclusion: GPs had often appropriate management of skin cancer. The major obstacles to skin's cancer screening were the lack of time and difficult access to dermatologists. The setting-up of an easier access with teledermatology was requested by 89% of responders, and should improve early detection of melanoma.
Invasive Scalp Melanoma: Role for Enhanced Detection Through Professional Training

Brendan P Lovasik,Ishna Sharma,Maria C Russell,Grant W Carlson,Keith A Delman,Monica Rizzo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5334-9

Abstract:Background: Scalp and neck melanomas (SNMs) have a relatively poor prognosis compared to other sites, and represent an anatomically challenging area for detection. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the hairdresser in detection of SNMs. Methods: A tertiary surgical oncology institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients undergoing resection of a scalp, posterior neck, or retro auricular invasive primary melanoma between 2008 and 2014. Results: SNMs accounted for 128 melanoma patients during the study period, with median age 66 years, 88 % male, and median Breslow thickness 1.55 mm. Hairdressers detected 10 % of all SNMs, with hairdresser-detected SNMs presenting 13 years younger (53 vs. 66 years, P = 0.015), and with a trend towards lower Breslow depth (1.15 vs. 1.63) and more frequent discovery in AJCC Stage Ia or Ib (66.7 % vs. 44.8 %) than otherwise-detected SNMs. Women with SNMs were 1.8-fold more likely than men to have their SNMs detected by a hairdresser (P = 0.001), and presented at higher AJCC clinical stage than men and required wider surgical resection margins (P = 0.011). Women with hairdresser-detected SNMs were younger, with lower Breslow thickness and lower AJCC Clinical Stage than women with otherwise-detected SNM. Conclusion: This study suggests that hairdressers play a critical role in detection of invasive primary scalp and neck melanoma, accounting for 10 % of all melanomas referred to a tertiary surgical oncology center. Quality improvement initiatives aimed at increasing early detection of scalp and neck melanoma should include members of the cosmetology community.
Is an online skin cancer toolkit an effective way to educate primary care physicians about skin cancer diagnosis and referral?

A. Gulati,C.A. Harwood,J. Rolph,E. Pottinger,J.M. Mcgregor,N. Goad,C.M. Proby

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.13167

2015-04-27

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Skin disorders account for over 20% of GP consultations. Half of dermatology referrals to secondary care are for skin lesions, but only 12% of urgent skin cancer referrals are deemed appropriate. Suitably designed online learning resources may positively impact GP confidence in the recognition of skin cancer and improve patient outcomes.OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the impact of a national, online, skin cancer recognition toolkit on GP confidence and knowledge in diagnosing skin cancers and referral behaviour to secondary care.METHODS: The toolkit, consisting of a referral decision aid, lesion recognition resource, clinical cases and a quiz, was launched in March 2012. Website usage statistics and online focus groups were used to assess the usability of the website and perceived changes in behaviour. The impact of the toolkit was assessed using national skin cancer referral data, cross-sectional questionnaires and urgent skin cancer referral data to two NHS trusts.RESULTS: The toolkit was accessed by 20% of GPs in England from 20th March to 31st October 2012; spending a mean of over 5 minutes each, with over 33% return users. A survey revealed that the toolkit improved perceptions of skin cancer training and self-reported knowledge about skin cancer referral pathways. Analysis of referral patterns did not identify an impact of the toolkit on number or appropriateness of urgent skin cancer referrals in the eight months following the launch of the website. Online focus groups confirmed the usefulness of the resource and suggested a positive influence on knowledge and referral behaviour.CONCLUSION: The skin cancer toolkit is an accessible online learning resource for improving confidence with skin cancer referral amongst GPs. Although we were unable to identify any immediate changes in skin cancer diagnoses or appropriate referral behaviours, research is required to evaluate its longer term effects on outcomes.

dermatology
Comparison of visual diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists practicing in Germany in patients with light skin and skin of color

Frederik Krefting,Maurice Moelleken,Stefanie Hölsken,Jan-Malte Placke,Robin Tamara Eisenburger,Lea Jessica Albrecht,Alpaslan Tasdogan,Dirk Schadendorf,Selma Ugurel,Joachim Dissemond,Wiebke Sondermann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-59426-4

IF: 4.6

2024-04-17

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Visual clinical diagnosis of dermatoses in people of color (PoC) is a considerable challenge in daily clinical practice and a potential cause of misdiagnosis in this patient cohort. The study aimed to determine the difference in visual diagnostic skills of dermatologists practicing in Germany in patients with light skin (Ls) and patients with skin of color (SoC) to identify a potential need for further education. From April to June 2023, German dermatologists were invited to complete an online survey with 24 patient photographs depicting 12 skin diseases on both Ls and SoC. The study's primary outcomes were the number of correctly rated photographs and the participants' self-assessed certainty about the suspected visual diagnosis in Ls compared to SoC. The final analysis included surveys from a total of 129 dermatologists (47.8% female, mean age: 39.5 years). Participants were significantly more likely to correctly identify skin diseases by visual diagnostics in patients with Ls than in patients with SoC (72.1% vs. 52.8%, p ≤ 0.001, OR 2.28). Additionally, they expressed higher confidence in their diagnoses for Ls than for SoC (73.9 vs. 61.7, p ≤ 0.001). Therefore, further specialized training seems necessary to improve clinical care of dermatologic patients with SoC.

multidisciplinary sciences
Artificial Intelligence Support for Skin Lesion Triage in Primary Care and Dermatology (Preprint)

Harmony Thompson,Amanda Oakley,Michael B Jameson,Adrian Bowling

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.35395

2021-12-02

Abstract:BACKGROUND Primary care providers, dermatology specialists, and health care access are key components of primary prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of skin cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers the promise of diagnostic support for nonspecialists, but real-world clinical validation of AI in primary care is lacking. OBJECTIVE We aimed to (1) assess the reliability of an AI-based clinical triage algorithm in classifying benign and malignant skin lesions and (2) evaluate the quality of images obtained in primary care using the study camera (3Gen DermLite Cam v4 or similar). METHODS This was a single-center, prospective, double-blinded observational study with a predetermined study design. We recruited participants with suspected skin cancer in 20 primary care practices who were referred for assessment via teledermatology. A second set of photographs taken using a standardized camera was processed by the AI algorithm. We evaluated the image quality and compared two teledermatologists’ diagnoses by consensus (the “gold standard”) with AI and histology where applicable. RESULTS Our primary outcome assessment stratified 391 skin lesions by management as benign, uncertain, or malignant. Uncertain lesions were not included in the sensitivity and specificity analyses. Uncertain lesions included lesions that had either diagnostic or management uncertainties. For the remaining 242 lesions, the sensitivity was 97.26% (95% CI 93.13%-99.25%) and the specificity was 97.92% (95% CI 92.68%-99.75%). The AI algorithm was compared with the histological diagnoses for 123 lesions. The sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 95.85%-100%) and the specificity was 72.22% (95% CI 54.81%-85.80%). CONCLUSIONS The AI algorithm demonstrates encouraging results, with high sensitivity and specificity, concordant with previous AI studies. It shows potential as a triage tool in conjunction with teledermatology to augment health care and improve access to dermatology. Further real-life studies need to be conducted on a larger scale to assess the reliability, usability, and cost-effectiveness of the algorithm in primary care.
BT39 Teledermatology assessment of community skin lesion referrals: insights, challenges and recommendations

Vivienne Nguyen,Ruth Jones,Girish Gupta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.436

IF: 11.113

2024-06-28

British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract:Abstract Consultations for skin lesions rank are a very common reason for general practitioner (GP) visits, with the urgent suspicion of cancer (USOC) referral pathway directing potentially cancerous lesions to dermatologists in our region. Despite the valuable role of clinical photographs alongside referrals, the variable quality poses a significant challenge. From March to April 2023, 100 GP referrals containing photos in our USOC pathway underwent analysis by two independent consultant dermatologists. They provided their top three diagnoses with free-text comments on image quality. Notably, prevalent image comments included ‘out of focus (60%)’ and ‘poor illumination’ (55%). Dermoscopy images were included in 15 community photos. Consultant 1 (G.G.) identified seborrhoeic keratosis as the primary diagnosis in 32%, while consultant 2 (R.J.) noted it as the top diagnosis in 34%. Consultant 1 included the GP’s diagnosis in their top three differentials 40% of the time, while consultant 2 did so 30% of the time. Existing guidance on teledermatology image quality is limited but emphasizes clear, well-lit photos with proper focus, taken from various angles and distances. Despite this, our data reveal a noticeable deviation from these practices. We propose that possible contributory factors leading to poor-quality images include time constraints during GP consultations, lack of awareness regarding guidance, and the use of devices with suboptimal image resolution. Notably, there are no local specific guidelines for community photos in our area. Based on our findings, we have created a local guideline, emphasizing the need for clear, focused images where the lesion is centrally framed, utilizing natural sunlight ideally at an angle to highlight skin texture. Additionally, an enlarged photo is recommended, balancing size with the maintenance of focus on the area of interest. Teledermatology provides broader access to expert advice, facilitates timely consultations, improves efficiency, and encourages global collaboration. However, the heterogeneity in photos can lead to misdiagnosis, inappropriate triage, and inefficient resource allocation. The implementation of guidance for referral photos can optimize resource use, enhance patient satisfaction, and streamline workflow.

dermatology
The integration of dermatology experts into primary care to assess and treat patients with skin lesions is cost‐effective: A quasi‐experimental study

Maria Lovén,Laura Huilaja,Markus Paananen,Paulus Torkki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20451

2024-12-03

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract:The integration of dermatologist into primary care settings is cost‐effective and streamlines the management of patients with skin conditions. The cost for each additional pre‐malignancy or malignancy treated is €853 lower, and for any additional skin finding treated, €381 lower than that of the standard care pathway. Background The management of patients with skin changes can be challenging in primary healthcare; general practitioners (GPs) often lack the expertise to make accurate assessments and treatment decisions. The standard care pathway for skin changes can result in extended treatment times and costs. Objectives This study was designed to evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of integrating a dermatologist into the primary care setting to assess and treat patients with skin disorders. The primary outcome was the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each malignant or pre‐malignant skin disease found and treated. The secondary outcomes included ICER for any treated skin finding, number needed to excise to find malignant or pre‐malignant skin disease, number of hospital referrals required and changes in quality of life (QoL) in the presence and absence of the integration. Methods This was a quasi‐experimental cohort study conducted at three primary healthcare centres in Finland. In the two intervention centres, patients with skin findings visited a dermatologist; in the control centre they visited a GP. Cost‐effectiveness was assessed using the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER). QoL was assessed with the PROMIS v1.2, calculative EQ‐5D‐3L and PROMIS Anxiety 4a instruments. Results In total, 186 integration and 176 control patients were included. For an additional patient treated for a (pre‐)malignant skin disease, the ICER was €852 lower and with any skin disease €381 lower in the integration group than with standard care. Fewer biopsies were required for each malignant or pre‐malignant skin disease in the integration group compared to the control group (2.1 and 6.5 per patient; p

dermatology
P029 Targeted skin examinations: a reasonable compromise?

Aswatha Rabindranathnambi,Modupe Ojelabi,Georgina Elston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.056

IF: 11.113

2024-06-28

British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract:Abstract There has been a significant increase in referrals for suspected skin cancer since March 2021, resulting in busy urgent skin cancer clinics across the country. Gold-standard care would include a full-skin examination for all patients referred via this route to ensure other incidental lesions are not missed, but full-skin examinations are time-consuming and decrease the total number of patients who can be seen in clinic. There is only limited evidence regarding the benefits of full-skin examinations. We conducted a service evaluation: a retrospective review of all ‘new’ patients referred to a 2-week-wait skin cancer clinic in a district general hospital over a 12-month period (January to December 2022). All 205 patients were offered a full-skin examination, of whom 175 accepted full- or partial-skin examination. Overall, 21% (37 of 175) had incidental lesions identified that either warranted treatment or were concerning enough to need photography and further monitoring. Forty-four incidental lesions were picked up in total. The majority were actinic keratoses (n = 7) and basal cell cancers (n = 12). The other incidental lesions were atypical naevi (n = 8), intraepidermal carcinoma (n = 4), lentigo maligna (n = 1), vulval melanosis (n = 1) and malignant melanoma (n = 1). Importantly, most of the incidental lesions were seen in those > 50 years of age (92%) and were on the head and neck or upper body (89%). The majority of these patients (89% of those who had it documented) were found to have Fitzpatrick skin phototypes I or II. Our results suggest that examining the upper body in those > 50 years of age with skin type I and II has the highest yield of picking up further skin lesions that are either cancerous or could be precancerous. This upper-body, targeted skin examination has the potential to avoid further referrals, thus saving time and resources in the long run, for patients and primary and secondary care. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact on ‘hard’ outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rates, as well as potential cost benefits.

dermatology

CACN-1 is required in the Caenorhabditis elegans somatic gonad for proper oocyte development.

The skinny on skin: The role of skin-aware professionals in skin cancer surveillance

Melanoma Detection by Non-Specialists: An Untapped Potential for Triage?

Skin Cancer Referrals by Non-Medical Practitioners: A Prospective Observational Study

Analysis of early diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Slovenia

The effect of a dermoscopy training program on the diagnostic accuracy and management decisions regarding pigmented skin lesions: A comparison between dermal clinicians and general practitioners

The Role of Digital Dermoscopy and Follow-Up in the Detection of Amelanotic/Hypomelanotic Melanoma in a Group of High-Risk Patients—Is It Useful?

Fixing TIM : Identifying Functional Mutations in Protein Families through the Interactive Exploration of Sequence and Structural Data

Exploring the feasibility of an artificial intelligence based clinical decision support system for cutaneous melanoma detection in primary care – a mixed method study

Educational Interventions to Support Primary Care Provider Performance of Diagnostic Skin Cancer Examinations: A Systematic Literature Review

The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment.

P023 Real-world melanoma miss rate in an NHS hospital dermatology service

P024 Skin cancer referrals by nonmedical practitioners: a prospective observational study

[Recognition and initial management of melanoma by general practitioners: A survey in a rural French area with low medical density]

Invasive Scalp Melanoma: Role for Enhanced Detection Through Professional Training

Is an online skin cancer toolkit an effective way to educate primary care physicians about skin cancer diagnosis and referral?

Comparison of visual diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists practicing in Germany in patients with light skin and skin of color

Artificial Intelligence Support for Skin Lesion Triage in Primary Care and Dermatology (Preprint)

BT39 Teledermatology assessment of community skin lesion referrals: insights, challenges and recommendations

The integration of dermatology experts into primary care to assess and treat patients with skin lesions is cost‐effective: A quasi‐experimental study

P029 Targeted skin examinations: a reasonable compromise?