Abstract:Background: Advances in implant material and design have allowed for improvements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes. A cruciate retaining (CR) TKA provides the least constraint of TKA designs by preserving the native posterior cruciate ligament. Limited research exists that has examined clinical outcomes or patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a large cohort of patients undergoing a CR TKA utilizing a kinematically designed implant. It was hypothesized that the studied CR Knee System would demonstrate favorable outcomes and a clinically significant improvement in pain and functional scores. Aim: To assess both short-term and mid-term clinical outcomes and PROMs of a novel CR TKA design. Methods: A retrospective, multi-surgeon study identified 255 knees undergoing a TKA utilizing a kinematically designed CR Knee System (JOURNEY™ II CR; Smith and Nephew, Inc., Memphis, TN) at an urban, academic medical institution between March 2015 and July 2021 with a minimum of two-years of clinical follow-up with an orthopedic surgeon. Patient demographics, surgical information, clinical outcomes, and PROMs data were collected via query of electronic medical records. The PROMs collected in the present study included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) scores. The significance of improvements in mean PROM scores from preoperative scores to scores collected at six months and two-years postoperatively was analyzed using Independent Samples t-tests. Results: Of the 255 patients, 65.5% were female, 43.8% were White, and patients had an average age of 60.6 years. Primary osteoarthritis (96.9%) was the most common primary diagnosis. The mean surgical time was 105.3 minutes and mean length of stay was 2.1 d with most patients discharged home (92.5%). There were 18 emergency department (ED) visits within 90 d of surgery resulting in a 90 d ED visit rate of 7.1%, including a 2.4% orthopedic-related ED visit rate and a 4.7% non-orthopedic-related ED visit rate. There were three (1.2%) hospital readmissions within 90 d postoperatively. With a mean time to latest follow-up of 3.3 years, four patients (1.6%) required revision, two for arthrofibrosis, one for aseptic femoral loosening, and one for peri-prosthetic joint infection. There were significant improvements in KOOS JR, PROMIS Pain Intensity, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Mobility, and PROMIS Physical Health from preoperative scores to six month and two-year postoperative scores. Conclusion: The evaluated implant is an effective, novel design offering excellent outcomes and low complication rates. At a mean follow up of 3.3 years, four patients required revisions, three aseptic and one septic, resulting in an overall implant survival rate of 98.4% and an aseptic survival rate of 98.8%. The results of our study demonstrate the utility of this kinematically designed implant in the setting of primary TKA.

Early Improvement in Postoperative Clinical Outcomes without Patellar Resurfacing in Patella-Friendly Design of Medial Pivot TKA

Patellar resurfacing in contemporary total knee arthroplasty: Frequency of complications in a matched cohort

Patellar Resurfacing Versus Nonresurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: an Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Outcomes and Survivorships of Total Knee Arthroplasty Comparing Resurfaced and Unresurfaced Patellae

No difference in 1-year improvement of patient-reported physical functioning and pain between resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae: analysis of 17,224 primary total knee arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

Mid-term outcomes of a kinematically designed cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

Bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. A prospective single surgeon series with a minimum follow-up of 7 years

Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Never-Ending Controversy; Case Report and Literature Review

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Mid-Term Results

Patellar tilt does not affect patient reported outcomes after modern total knee arthroplasty

Long-term follow-up and survivorship of single-radius, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA

Factors associated with a clinically significant improvement in health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty

Influence of Femoral Implant Design Modification on Anterior Knee Pain and Patellar Crepitus in Patients Who Underwent Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patella Resurfacing.

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

Postoperative Complications of Patellar Resurfacing In Total Knee Replacement

Patelloplasty Versus Traditional Patellar Retention in TKA

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

[Management of extension apparatus in total knee arthroplasty of osteoarthritis].

Patella Reshaping Versus Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Study

Leaving the Patella Unresurfaced Does Not Increase the Risk of Short-Term Revision Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis from the American Joint Replacement Registry