Abstract:Background: Although in hospitals focussing on minimal invasive surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is widely practiced as method of choice in patients with acute appendicitis, the decision for the laparoscopic or the conventional technique (OA) is usually ensued by individual viewpoints. Aim of this prospective observation study was to analyse the decision algorithm for both procedures in patients with the presumptive diagnosis "appendicitis". Patients and methods: Between January 1996 and July 2001 512 patients with the presumptive diagnosis "acute appendicitis" underwent surgery and, assigned by intention-to-treat, were subdivided in a laparoscopic (I) and a conventional group (II). The choice of surgical procedure was analysed with regard to patient characteristics (age, gender, comorbidity), severity of appendicitis (clinical manifestation, preoperative inflammation signs), surgeon (clinical experience) and daytime (during the day, in the evening, at night). Furthermore, the outcome of either method was related to postoperative diagnosis, perioperative morbidity, analgesia, length of hospital stay and cosmetic results. Results: In group I 265 patients and in group II 247 patients underwent surgery. Conversion from LA to OA was necessary in 6.4 %. Group I consisted of significantly more female (67.9 % vs. 45.7 %) and younger patients (21 yrs. vs. 30 yrs.) with less medical history as well as minor severity of tissue inflammation and significantly lower preoperative serum inflammation parameters (leukocytes (1000/ml): 10.6 +/- 4.3 vs. 13.5 +/- 4.9; CRP (mg/l): 2.3 +/- 3.3 vs. 5.6 +/- 7.5, I vs. II: p < 0.001). In group I more patients underwent surgery during day-time as well as by more laparoscopic-experienced surgeons. In the postoperative histopathologic evaluation there were significantly fewer cases with complicated appendicitis (33.2 % vs. 52.2 %, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients after LA revealed a lower postoperative complication rate (9.3 % vs. 18.3 %), length of hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days) and duration of analgesia (2.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 4.1 +/- 7.1 days). Conclusions: Important factors for decision algorithm between a laparoscopic or an open appendectomy include severity of appendicitis, gender, day-time as well as the surgeon's individual laparoscopic experience. With appropriate indication for each technique, both procedures are of equal value in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Furthermore the positive patient selection for laparoscopic appendectomy contributed to a better postoperative outcome in this study.

Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Comparison of Outcome in a Teaching Hospital, Northeast Nigeria

Comparision of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery and Traditional Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis

[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?]

Clinical Health Service Research on the Surgical Therapy of Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Outcomes Based on 3 German Multicenter Quality Assurance Studies Over 21 Years

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy performed by adult general surgeons in pre-teenage years children: a single-centre experience

Effectiveness of different appendiceal stump closure methods in laparoscopic appendectomy a network meta-analysis

A Contrastive Analysis of Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Safe: Influence of Appendectomy Technique on Surgical-site Infections and Intra-abdominal Abscesses

The outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in childhood

Acute Appendicitis Treatment Strategies and Mortality Based on Critical Illness on Admission: An Observational Study

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis versus chronic appendicitis.

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute and chronic appendicitis

Through Different Lenses: A Retrospective Analysis of the Agreement Between Laparoscopic and Histopathological Evaluations of the Appendix

Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using new surgical procedure versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess

Laparoscopic versus open management of duodenal perforation: a comparative study at a District General Hospital

Laparoscopy or Not

The prevention and treatment of the complications of laparoscopic appendectomy:with a report of 26 cases

New Strategy During Complicated Open Appendectomy: Convert Open Operation to Laparoscopy

Comparative Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Review

Laparoscopy or Not: A Meta-analysis of the Surgical Effects of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy