Abstract:Background: Although in hospitals focussing on minimal invasive surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is widely practiced as method of choice in patients with acute appendicitis, the decision for the laparoscopic or the conventional technique (OA) is usually ensued by individual viewpoints. Aim of this prospective observation study was to analyse the decision algorithm for both procedures in patients with the presumptive diagnosis "appendicitis". Patients and methods: Between January 1996 and July 2001 512 patients with the presumptive diagnosis "acute appendicitis" underwent surgery and, assigned by intention-to-treat, were subdivided in a laparoscopic (I) and a conventional group (II). The choice of surgical procedure was analysed with regard to patient characteristics (age, gender, comorbidity), severity of appendicitis (clinical manifestation, preoperative inflammation signs), surgeon (clinical experience) and daytime (during the day, in the evening, at night). Furthermore, the outcome of either method was related to postoperative diagnosis, perioperative morbidity, analgesia, length of hospital stay and cosmetic results. Results: In group I 265 patients and in group II 247 patients underwent surgery. Conversion from LA to OA was necessary in 6.4 %. Group I consisted of significantly more female (67.9 % vs. 45.7 %) and younger patients (21 yrs. vs. 30 yrs.) with less medical history as well as minor severity of tissue inflammation and significantly lower preoperative serum inflammation parameters (leukocytes (1000/ml): 10.6 +/- 4.3 vs. 13.5 +/- 4.9; CRP (mg/l): 2.3 +/- 3.3 vs. 5.6 +/- 7.5, I vs. II: p < 0.001). In group I more patients underwent surgery during day-time as well as by more laparoscopic-experienced surgeons. In the postoperative histopathologic evaluation there were significantly fewer cases with complicated appendicitis (33.2 % vs. 52.2 %, p < 0.001). Additionally, patients after LA revealed a lower postoperative complication rate (9.3 % vs. 18.3 %), length of hospital stay (median 3 vs. 4 days) and duration of analgesia (2.1 +/- 1.8 vs. 4.1 +/- 7.1 days). Conclusions: Important factors for decision algorithm between a laparoscopic or an open appendectomy include severity of appendicitis, gender, day-time as well as the surgeon's individual laparoscopic experience. With appropriate indication for each technique, both procedures are of equal value in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Furthermore the positive patient selection for laparoscopic appendectomy contributed to a better postoperative outcome in this study.

Clinical Health Service Research on the Surgical Therapy of Acute Appendicitis: Comparison of Outcomes Based on 3 German Multicenter Quality Assurance Studies Over 21 Years

[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?]

The outcome of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in childhood

Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Safe: Influence of Appendectomy Technique on Surgical-site Infections and Intra-abdominal Abscesses

A Clinical Comparison of Laparoscopic versus Open Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis

Laparoscopic versus Conventional Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis

Acute Appendicitis Treatment Strategies and Mortality Based on Critical Illness on Admission: An Observational Study

Clinical analysis on the treatment of acute appendicitis with laparoscopic operation and open appendectomy

Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in China: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: a Pilot Study.

Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approaches in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess diagnosed by radiologic investigation

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy:a report of 238 cases

The implementation of the acute care surgery model in the management of patients with acute appendicitis - A 5-year single-center, retrospective experience: An observational study

The clinical curative effect of laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendix

Open Versus Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Comparison of Outcome in a Teaching Hospital, Northeast Nigeria

Is Endoscopic Retrograde Appendicitis Therapy a Better Modality for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Through Different Lenses: A Retrospective Analysis of the Agreement Between Laparoscopic and Histopathological Evaluations of the Appendix

Laparoscopic appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis—a systematic review

A clinical comparative study on laparoscopic appendectomy vs open appendectomy

Meta-analysis of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess

Efficacy Discussion of LA and Open appendectomy in Treating Acute appendicitis