Abstract:Objective To evaluate the early outcomes and risk factors of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods A retrospective study was performed on RA patients who had undergone RSA between January 2016 and January 2018. Preoperative glenohumeral joint damage was evaluated according to two radiographic classification systems. The severity of joint damage was estimated using Larsen's method, while the Levigne‐Franceschi method was used to assess the type of destruction. Further, we recorded intra‐ and postoperative complications. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of shoulder pain while shoulder function was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Shoulder Score. In addition, patients' subjective outcome and range of shoulder motion were recorded. Radiographs were taken and examined during the follow‐up period. Paired t‐test was used to determine the difference in measurement data between preoperative and the last follow‐up. VAS was analyzed using the Wilcoxon matched‐pairs signed‐rank test. Results A total of 14 patients with 14 shoulders were included. All the patients were female with an average age of 60.29 years (range, 49–71 years) at the time of surgery and an average RA disease duration of 24.57 years (range, 5–40 years). Seven of the 14 patients had a history of joint surgery related to RA. Meanwhile, 11 of the 14 shoulders showed glenoid bone defect, and eccentric reaming was performed intraoperatively to avoid base plate malposition. The mean follow‐up period for the 14 patients was 2.76 years (range, 2–4 years). The mean VAS decreased from a value of 5.71 ± 1.10 preoperatively to 1.36 ± 0.61 postoperatively (P < 0.001). On the contrary, the ASES score showed an increase from 33.93 ± 6.89 to 76.67 ± 5.23 (P < 0.001). An increase in active forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation with the arm in 90° of abduction from 85.71° ± 17.61°, 77.14° ± 19.43°, and 17.14° ± 10.97° to 126.43° ± 5.23°, 106.42° ± 11.72°, and 38.57° ± 14.57°, respectively, was observed (P < 0.001). Subjective outcome assessment showed that 13 of the 14 patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the operation, while one patient was uncertain due to co‐existing ipsilateral elbow lesion. Notably, one patient acquired a humeral periprosthetic fracture during the operation. In this study, no major complications such as periprosthetic joint infection and dislocation or implant loosening were observed. Further, no patients underwent revision for any reason at the end of the follow‐up. Conclusions RSA could achieve good early outcomes without high complication rates in patients with RA. Glenoid bone defects and adjacent joints involvement were common in this patient group, which might increase the risk of surgery and affect postoperative satisfaction.

Pediatric Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (PQ-LES-Q): reliability and validity.

Stress shielding: short-term radiological results of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty with an anatomic proximal coated stem in proximal humeral fractures

The risk of postoperative scapular spine fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increased with an onlay humeral stem

Stress shielding following radial head arthroplasty: the impact of preoperative bone quality

Stemless reverse arthroplasty: Does the stemless compare to a conventional stemmed implant? Clinical and radiographic evaluation 2 years minimum follow up

The American College of Radiology's mammography lexicon: barking up the only tree.

[Studies on linoleic acid requirements in premature- and newborn infants under the conditions of parenteral feeding].

Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8mm of Glenoid-Sided Lateralization Does Not Increase the Risk of Acromial or Scapular Spine Stress Fracture Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With a 135° Inlay Humeral Component

Finite element analysis part 2 of 2: Glenohumeral bone stress distribution depends on implant configuration for anatomic and reverse stemless shoulder implants

Manganese-catalyzed cleavage of a carbon-carbon single bond between carbonyl carbon and α-carbon atoms of ketones.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Humeral position after reverse shoulder arthroplasty as measured by lateralization and distalization angles and association with acromial stress fracture; a case-control study

Migration inhibitory action of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on progenitor cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage growing in culture in the presence of colony‐stimulating factor (CSF‐1)

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Early Outcomes, Pitfalls, and Challenges

[Our experience with the measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension for evaluation of blood circulation in peripheral arteries in patients with critical ischemic disease of lower limbs].

Central neural counterparts of penile potency and libido in humans and subhuman mammals.

Cementless Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Implantation With Humeral Matchstick Autograft Augmentation: Early Radiographic Outcomes

Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results

Inadvertent, intraoperative, non- to minimally displaced periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures in RTSA do not affect the clinical and radiographic short-term outcome

Inverted-bearing reverse shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, complications, clinical, and radiological outcomes

Clinical Results and CT Analysis of ISA Stemless at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years