Abstract:Background: Simulations have historically aided training programs by providing a realistic and holistic replication of professional scenarios and procedures. Simulations have developed over the past 40 years to include varying fidelities and modalities of simulation. Learning in a simulation-centered environment has benefits, ranging from improved patient care to specific skills acquisition while catering to students’ numerous and varied learning approaches. Simulation is a multifaceted field that benefits all parties, the teachers, the learners, and the patients. The application of simulation to medical education and its amalgamation with other modes and substitutes allows for a more integrated learning and testing curriculum that advances the current trajectory of medical education. Such developments, however, are limited to resource rich areas, leaving behind low-middle income countries to use traditional, less evolved methodologies and practices. This review aimed to explore different aspects of simulation and focus specifically on low-cost task trainers and their accessibility. Method: The purpose of the study was to assess the accessibility of low-cost task trainers in terms of cost-effectiveness, distribution, validation, and frequency within specific specialties. To do so, 84 PubMed publications have been screened, and 39 filtered research studies have collected the necessary data. After analyzing the papers, we classified the following information – process, specialization, validation (y/n), costs, development location, and year of publication. Results: After carefully analyzing the accumulated data from the selected 39 publications, we found that most studies (i.e., 6 out of 39) were published in 2020. Emergency Medicine was the most common specialty for which low-cost trainers were developed (9 out of 39 procedural simulators); Otolaryngology followed this with 8 out of 39 trainers and general surgery with 7/39 of the task-trainers. The price ranges fluctuated and fell within the price bracket of USD 0 to USD 400 collectively. Our review also uncovered the concentration of development of such innovations solely in high income countries (HICs). Conclusion: Simulation is an invaluable tool applicable to a diverse range of phases of medical education. Future conjunction of simulation with low-cost substitutes along with increased encouragement and enthusiasm towards developing cost effective simulation-based learning environments (SBLEs) with the reserves and requirements of these areas in mind may prove to be a reliable option for low and middle resource settings

Medical Simulation: The Missing Link in Achieving Safer, More Cost-Effective Care

Use of Simulation for Improving Quality and Patient Safety

Medical Simulation: The New Tool for Training and Skill Assessment

The role of medical simulation: an overview

Simulation technology in training students, residents and faculty

Simulation exercises as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review

Educational and Patient Care Impacts of In Situ Simulation in Healthcare

The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review

Simulators and the simulation environment: Getting the balance right in simulation-based surgical education

Simulation's Use Across the Clinical Landscape

Improving Patient Safety through Simulation Training in Anesthesiology: Where Are We?

Promoting Simulation-Based Learning through Low-Cost Simulators: Development, Skills Targeted and Implementation

Incorporation of Simulation in Graduate Medical Education: Historical Perspectives, Current Status, and Future Directions

Simulation and Quality Improvement in Anesthesiology

The Future of Simulation in Healthcare Safety and System Improvement

How Simulation-Based Medical Education Can Be Started In Low Resource Settings.

Trends and Innovations of Simulation for Twenty First Century Medical Education

Implementing Simple and Effective Simulation Experiences

Call to Action: Quality and Simulation Professionals Should Collaborate

Medical Simulation-Based Education Improves Medicos’ Clinical Skills

Performance of technology-driven simulators for medical students--a systematic review