(020) Comparing Postoperative Outcomes and Risk Factors for Patients Undergoing Partial vs Total Penectomy for Penile Carcinoma
A Liu,S Kalidoss,C Yeaman,D Bryk,J Fustok,T Shelton,H Alhameedi,N Payakachat,M Khalil,O Raheem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae001.018
2024-02-01
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Introduction The American Cancer Society estimates that 2,200 men develop penile cancer annually and 440 men will die from the disease. Partial penectomies (PP) and total penectomies (TP) are both performed for penile cancer in the United States. Compared to TP, PP is performed more frequently to preserve functional urinary outcomes. Objective To date TP and PP outcomes have not been compared, in this study we compared clinical characteristics and post-operative outcomes between TP and PP conducted between 2006-2016. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of penile cancer patients from National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the years 2010-2016 using international classification of diseases clinical modification (ICD-CM) ninth revision codes. A total of 260 patients, 67 TP and 193 PP patients, were included. Results Partial penectomy patients were less likely to be transferred patients (7.3% vs 20.9%, p=0.002), less likely to be suffering from diabetes (25.9% vs 40.3%, p=0.026), and were more likely to have preoperative laboratory values within normal limits. TP was associated with increased preoperative white blood cell count x109, preoperative white blood cell count > 7.5x109 (p<0.001), preoperative hematocrit (p<0.001). PP patients were, in contrast, shown to have higher pre-operative creatinine levels (p=.037) and lower platelet levels than TP patients (p=.045). PP patients had shorter operation times (78.8 vs 145.5 min, p<0.001). PP patients also had decreased levels of inpatient stay length (1.67 vs 4.31, p<0.001), any 30-day post-surgery complication (7% vs 31%, p<0.001), deep incisional surgical site infection (0.5% vs 6% p=0.017), wound disruption (0.5% vs 6.0%p=0.017), intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (1.6% vs 7.5%, p=0.029), and sepsis (0.5% vs 7.5%, p=0.005), when compared to patients who underwent TP. TP patients displayed a significantly greater number of concurrent surgical procedures (p<0.001), when compared to PP patients. There was no information on urinary, sexual, and erectile outcomes in the database. Conclusions PP is associated with fewer post-operative complications, shorter surgeries, shorter hospital stays, and fewer concurrent surgical procedures. Total penectomy is associated with a greater proportion of patients suffering from comorbid conditions, suggesting that TP patients are at higher risk for post-surgical complications and longer hospital stays. There is a gap in reported data pertaining to post-operative sexual function and erectile outcomes for PP at a national level. Disclosure No.
urology & nephrology