Abstract:The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), a cortical response time-locked to each heartbeat, is suggested as an implicit electrophysiological marker reflecting the cortical processing of heartbeats, and more broadly interoceptive processing. An increasing number of studies suggest that HEP may be a meaningful clinical measure. However, on the scalp, HEP are low amplitude signals that are mixed with direct cardiac field artefacts. Therefore, signal processing pipelines that separate the cortical HEP from cardiac field artefacts are required. With a view to establishing optimal and standardised HEP pipelines, this review aims to evaluate the current approaches to this analysis used within the literature, address gaps and inconsistencies in HEP pipelines, and highlight the impact of crucial parameter choices. To do this, a scoping review investigated current HEP processing methods and parameters used in EEG and MEG studies. Testing these processing methods on Temple University's normal scalp EEG data (Obeid and Picone, 2016), the effect of different methods/parameters (e.g. HEP window, electrodes, filters, independent component analysis (ICA) and artefact subspace reconstruction (ASR)) on HEP extraction was explored. EEG studies (N=101) demonstrated greater parameter variability and heterogeneity than MEG studies (N=10), although significantly more studies used EEG. ICA without cardiac field artefact and ASR at threshold 20 exhibit similar results for artefact removal. Statistical analysis revealed that the RR interval, the start and end of the HEP window and the start of the baseline correction window significantly affect HEP values in pre-frontal, frontal and centrotemporal electrodes. Publications should report critical values for reliable HEP extraction, emphasising the need for standardised methods to enhance study comparison and reproducibility and establish a gold standard in the field.

EEG might be better left alone, but ERPs must be attended to: Optimizing the late positive potential preprocessing pipeline

EEG is better when cleaning effectively targets artifacts

[Research of the Late Positive Potential of Emotional Cognitive Reappraisal Electroencephalogram Signal Based on OVR-CSP].

The more, the better? Evaluating the role of EEG preprocessing for deep learning applications

How EEG preprocessing shapes decoding performance

How do the resting EEG preprocessing states affect the outcomes of postprocessing?

Evaluating the effectiveness of artifact correction and rejection in event‐related potential research

Temporal dynamics of emotional processing: Parsing trial-wise variance of the late positive potential using Generalizability Theory

Interactions Between Pre-Processing and Classification Methods for Event-Related-Potential Classification

The HAPPE plus Event-Related (HAPPE+ER) Software: A Standardized Processing Pipeline for Event-Related Potential Analyses

Deep learning-based EEG analysis: investigating P3 ERP components

Analysis of EEG Signals During Visual Processing: an ERP Study

Improved data quality and statistical power of trial-level event-related potentials with Bayesian random-shift Gaussian processes

Variations in ERP data quality across paradigms, participants, and scoring procedures

The HAPPE plus Event-Related (HAPPE+ER) software: A standardized preprocessing pipeline for event-related potential analyses

Methodological approaches to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: past practices and future recommendations

SHAP value-based ERP analysis (SHERPA): Increasing the sensitivity of EEG signals with explainable AI methods

Stylized faces enhance ERP features used for the detection of emotional responses

Preprocessing Choices for P3 Analyses with Mobile EEG: A Systematic Literature Review and Interactive Exploration

RELAX part 2: A fully automated EEG data cleaning algorithm that is applicable to Event-Related-Potentials

Early ERP functions are indexed by lateralized effects to peripherally presented emotional faces and scrambles.