Rapid Identification of Microorganisms from Positive Blood Cultures in Pediatric Patients by MALDI-TOF MS: Sepsityper Kit Versus Short-Term Subculture.
Chao Fang,Zheng Zhou,Jianping Li,Xuejun Chen,Mingming Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105894
IF: 2.622
2020-01-01
Journal of Microbiological Methods
Abstract:Background and aim: The rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) often leads to better clinical outcomes. The present study was conducted to compare two rapid protocols (Sepsityper kit and short-term subculture) for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)-based identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures in pediatric patients. Methods: This study was conducted between May 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, at a tertiary children's hospital in eastern China. Only monomicrobial blood cultures included in this study were used to conduct the Sepsityper kit protocol and short-term subculture protocol at the same time. Results: In total, 115 monomicrobial blood cultures were included in this study. For the Sepsityper kit protocol, 85.2% and 64.3% of microorganisms were correctly identified to the genus (score >= 1.700) and species levels (score >= 2.000), respectively. For the short-term subculture protocol, 89.6% and 70.4% of microorganisms were correctly identified to the genus and species levels, respectively. At the genus level (P = .321) or the species level (P = .325), there was no significant difference between the Sepsityper kit protocol and the short-term subculture protocol. Moreover, the short-term subculture protocol exhibited similar performance between Grampositive bacteria (GPB) and Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (the genus level: 93.7% (GPB) versus 87.9% (GNB), P = .518; the species level: 68.4% (GPB) versus 81.8% (GNB), P = .147). In addition, the Sepsityper kit protocol exhibited similar performance between GPB and GNB at the genus level (86.1% (GPB) versus 84.8% (GNB), P = 1.000). However, the Sepsityper kit protocol exhibited better performance in GNB at the species level (58.2% (GPB) versus 81.8% (GNB), P = .017). The rates of yeast-like fungi were correctly identified to the genus level (0.0%) or the species level (0.0%) for short-term subculture protocol were significantly lower than those of other microorganisms (the genus level: 92.0%, P = .001; the species level: 72.3%, P = .024). However, a similar result of identification was not found using the Sepsityper kit protocol (the genus level: P = .384; the species level: P = .599). In addition, the two rapid protocols both exhibited better performance at the genus level when the time to positivity (TTP) of blood cultures < 19 h (the Sepsityper kit protocol: 91.8% (TTP < 19 h) versus 77.8% (TTP >= 19 h), P = .034; the short-term subculture protocol: 95.1% (TTP < 19 h) versus 83.3% (TTP >= 19 h), P = .040). In addition, the two rapid protocols both exhibited better performance at the species level when the TTP of blood cultures was < 19 h (the Sepsityper kit protocol: 78.7% (< 19 h) versus 48.1% (TTP >= 19 h), P = .000; the short-term subculture protocol: 83.6% (TTP < 19 h) versus 55.6% (TTP >= 19 h), P = .001). Conclusion: The Sepsityper kit protocol and short-term subculture protocol are both reliable and rapid methods for the identification of most microorganisms from positive blood cultures in pediatric patients. The performance of these two rapid protocols is associated with the TTP of blood cultures.