Assessment of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF- MS) for Accurate Bacterial Identification in Clinical Labs

M Abdel-Rahman,M S Azab,M Meibed,A El-Kholy,A W Elmetwalli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa161.313
2020-10-01
American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Abstract:Abstract Introduction/Objective On behalf of the diagnostic Medical Laboratory rapid, and accurate identification of bacteria with their one-to-one anti-microbial susceptibility outlines is of ultimate importance for the management of infected patients. Contemporary microbial identification methods employed in routine clinical diagnostic laboratories relies on the use of conventional phenotypic methods. Phenotypic methods are time consuming with minimum turn-around times of at least 24 hrs and in many occurrences of 48hrs. With the intention of accelerate laboratory processes the MALDI-TOF MS was familiarized. MALDI-TOF MS is established on proteomic profiling and permits for rapid identification of bacteria. This technology has not been widely used in Egypt, but has been regularly used in Europe for the past few years. Methods Two hundred forty three positive non duplicate blood cultures were accrued over a period of six months. Experimental aliquots were taken from excess sample material that was collected as part of routine clinical care. 105 were positive for Gram negative bacilli, 123 were positive for Gram positive cocci, 3 positive for Gram positive bacilli, and 7 were positive for yeast. MALDI-TOF identification was compared to conventional identification. Conventional identification consisted of a combination of MALDI-TOF identification of a subcultures colony by direct smear, biochemical reactions, Vitek 2, and molecular identification. Results Ninety seven of the one hundred and five blood cultures positive for Gram negative bacilli were monomicrobial. The majority of these were identified as Escherichia coli by conventional methods, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty-four of these monomicrobial cultures were identified by MALDI-TOF to the species level. Eighty-one of the eighty-four were concordant with the conventional identification (96.4%). Conclusion The MALDI-TOF proved to be useful for the rapid and reliable identification of g-ve bacteria from the clinical specimens. The difference in turnaround time for bacterial identification was significant between MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK 2 with minimal preparation for the blood cultures.
pathology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?