Abstract:How children seek knowledge and evaluate claims may depend on their understanding of the source of knowledge. What shifts in their understandings about why scientists might disagree and how claims about the state of the world are justified? Until about the age of 41/2, knowledge is seen as self-evident. Children believe that knowledge of reality comes directly through our senses and what others tell us. They appeal to these external sources in order to know. The attainment of Theory of Mind (ToM) at this age is commonly seen as the significant shift in development in understanding disagreements in knowledge claims. Children attaining ToM understand that someone exposed to incorrect or incomplete information might have false beliefs. Disagreement, then, is still attributed to objective sources of knowledge. The current study examines the later developing Interpretive Theory of Mind (iToM) as the basis for children's understanding of how people with access to the same information might disagree and what this means for how to provide justification for a knowledge claim. Fourteen 2nd graders with the most iToM responses to four tasks and 14 with the fewest iToM responses were selected from a larger sample of 91. In analyses of interviews about a story in which two experts make different claims about a scientific phenomenon, those in the high iToM group noted subjective perspective and processes as the source of disagreement and suggested the need for investigation as the means to knowing. In contrast, those in the low iToM group mostly could not explain the source of disagreement and held that knowledge is acquired from external sources. A comparison of the interviews regarding the science story 2 years later allows for a qualitative description of the development. Those in the low iToM group showed more general recognition of subjective and constructive processes in knowing whereas those in the high iToM group identified interpretive processes and the relativity of perspectives with implications for how observations were conducted and interpreted. Only those in the high iToM group referred to the importance of evidence as a basis for knowledge claims at either point in the study.

Turkish- and English-speaking 3-year-old children are sensitive to the evidential strength of claims when revising their beliefs

What’s the Evidence Say? The Relation Between Evidential-Trust and Theory of Mind

Linguistic Cues Facilitate Children’s Understanding of Belief-Reporting Sentences

Children's On-Line Processing of Epistemic Modals.

When children can explain why they believe a claim, they suggest a better empirical test for that claim

Selective social belief revision in young children

Checking out the unexplained: With age, children become increasingly skeptical of surprising claims.

Says who? Children consider informants' sources when deciding whom to believe.

Religious polarization and justification of belief in invisible scientific versus religious entities

Evaluations of epistemic and practical reasons for belief in a predominantly White U.S. sample of preschoolers

Influence of causal language on causal understanding: A comparison between Swiss German and Turkish

Children’s Spontaneous Correction of False Beliefs in a Conversation Partner

Testimony and observation of statistical evidence interact in adults' and children's category-based induction

Exposure to detectable inaccuracies makes children more diligent fact-checkers of novel claims

More than true: Developmental changes in use of the inductive strength for selective trust

Toddlers' social evaluations of agents who act on false beliefs

Children's reasoning about continuous causal processes: The role of verbal and non-verbal ability

The relationship between parental mental-state language and 2.5-year-olds' performance on a nontraditional false-belief task

Young Schoolchildren's Epistemic Development: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study

Children Infer Intentions by Assessing Epistemic Attitudes in Interpersonal Interactions

The perception of foreign languages and culture for early childhood