Abstract:Although previous studies point to qualitative similarities between working memory (WM) and attention, the degree to which these two constructs rely on shared neural mechanisms remains unknown. Focusing on one such potentially shared mechanism, we tested the hypothesis that selecting an item within WM utilizes similar neural mechanisms as selecting a visible item via a shift of attention. We used fMRI and machine learning to decode both the selection among items visually available and the selection among items stored in WM in human subjects (both sexes). Patterns of activity in visual, parietal, and to a lesser extent frontal cortex predicted the locations of the selected items. Critically, these patterns were strikingly interchangeable; classifiers trained on data during attentional selection predicted selection from WM, and classifiers trained on data during selection from memory predicted attentional selection. Using models of voxel receptive fields, we visualized topographic population activity that revealed gain enhancements at the locations of the externally and internally selected items. Our results suggest that selecting among perceived items and selecting among items in WM share a common mechanism. This common mechanism, analogous to a shift of spatial attention, controls the relative gains of neural populations that encode behaviorally relevant information. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT How we allocate our attention to external stimuli that we see and to internal representations of stimuli stored in memory might rely on a common mechanism. Supporting this hypothesis, we demonstrated that not only could patterns of human brain activity predict which items were selected during perception and memory, but that these patterns were interchangeable during external and internal selection. Additionally, this generalized selection mechanism operates by changes in the gains of the neural populations both encoding attended sensory representations and storing relevant memory representations.

Recognition memory fluctuates with sustained attention regardless of task relevance

Accessing without remembering: memory consolidation of information at the focus of awareness is optional

Attention with or Without Working Memory: Mnemonic Reselection of Attended Information.

Attribute Amnesia: Failure to report attended, task-relevant attributes of a highly visible object.

Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory

The Attentional Blink Between Two Color Processing Tasks

Prolonged Focal Attention Without Binding: Tracking A Ball for Half A Minute Without Remembering Its Color

Not all attention orienting is created equal: Recognition memory is enhanced when attention orienting involves distractor suppression

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

The role of attentional fluctuation during study in recollecting episodic changes at test

Objective Markers of Sustained Attention Fluctuate Independently of Mind-Wandering Reports

Attention focused on memory: The episodic flanker effect with letters, words, colors, and pictures

Memory augmentation with an adaptive cognitive interface

Memory-driven capture during focused visual attention

Effects of task switching and emotional stimuli on memory selectivity

Retaining Gestalt integration in working memory requires domain-specific attention

Manipulating attentional priority creates a trade-off between memory and sensory representations in human visual cortex

Re-focusing visual working memory during expected and unexpected memory tests

Goal-directed attention transforms both working and long-term memory representations in the human parietal cortex

Selective attention effects on recognition: the roles of list context and perceptual difficulty

Selective attention to stimulus representations in perception and memory: commonalities and differences