Abstract:The Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser has been the gold-standard for laser lithotripsy over the last 20 years. However, recent reports about a new prototype thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripter have revealed impressive levels of performance. We therefore decided to systematically review the reality and expectations for this new TFL technology. This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42019128695). A PubMed search was performed for papers including specific terms relevant to this systematic review published between the years 2015 and 2019, including already accepted but not yet published papers. Additionally, the medical sections of ScienceDirect, Wiley, SpringerLink, Mary Ann Liebert publishers, and Google Scholar were also searched for peer-reviewed abstract presentations. All relevant studies and data identified in the bibliographic search were selected, categorized, and summarized. The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines for this review. The TFL emits laser radiation at a wavelength of 1,940 nm, and has an optical penetration depth in water about four-times shorter than the Ho:YAG laser. This results in four-times lower stone ablation thresholds, as well as lower tissue ablation thresholds. As the TFL uses electronically-modulated laser diodes, it offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters, with pulse frequencies up to 2,200 Hz, very low to very high pulse energies (0.005-6 J), short to very long-pulse durations (200 µs up to 12 ms), and a total power level up to 55 W. The stone ablation efficiency is up to four-times that of the Ho:YAG laser for similar laser parameters, with associated implications for speed and operating time. When using dusting settings, the TFL outperforms the Ho:YAG laser in dust quantity and quality, producing much finer particles. Retropulsion is also significantly reduced and sometimes even absent with the TFL. The TFL can use small laser fibers (as small as 50 µm core), with resulting advantages in irrigation, scope deflection, retropulsion reduction, and (in)direct effects on accessibility, visibility, efficiency, and surgical time, as well as offering future miniaturization possibilities. Similar to the Ho:YAG laser, the TFL can also be used for soft tissue applications such as prostate enucleation (ThuFLEP). The TFL machine itself is seven times smaller and eight times lighter than a high-power Ho:YAG laser system, and consumes nine times less energy. Maintenance is expected to be very low due to the durability of its components. The safety profile is also better in many aspects, i.e., for patients, instruments, and surgeons. The advantages of the TFL over the Ho:YAG laser are simply too extensive to be ignored. The TFL appears to be a real alternative to the Ho:YAG laser and become a true game-changer in laser lithotripsy. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of the TFL, and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations.

In Vitro Comparison of Pulsed-Thulium:YAG, Holmium:YAG, and Thulium Fiber Laser

Ablation Efficiency of a Novel Thulium Fiber Laser: an in Vitro Study on Laser Setting and Fiber Usage.

What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications

Safety of a Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Lithotripsy: an in Vitro Study on the Thermal Effect and Its Impact Factor.

Comparison of holmium:yttrium‐aluminium‐garnet (YAG), thulium fiber laser, and pulsed thulium:YAG lasers on soft tissue: an ex vivo study

Comparison of Holmium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers on the Risk of Laser Fiber Fracture

Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super‐pulse thulium fibre lasers

Assessment of Holmium:YAG, Pulsed-Thulium:YAG and Thulium Fiber Lasers for Urinary Stone Ablation. In Vitro Study

In vitro investigation of stone ablation efficiency, char formation, spark generation, and damage mechanism produced by thulium fiber laser

Comparison of the effects of Ho: YAG laser virtual BasketTM pulse modulation and Thulium fiber laser on kidney tissue – an ex vivo experimental study

Thermal Injury And Laser Efficiency With Holmium: Yag And Thulium Fiber Laser. An In Vitro Study.

The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser—a systematic review

Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy

High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies

In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An In Vitro Assessment

Getting hot in here! Comparison of Holmium vs. thulium laser in an anatomic hydrogel kidney model

How much energy do we need to ablate 1 cubic millimeter of stone during Thulium Fiber Laser lithotripsy? An in vitro study

In Vitro Comparison of Holmium Lasers: Evidence for Shorter Fragmentation Time and Decreased Retropulsion Using a Modern Variable-pulse Laser

[Experimental verification of thulium lithotripsy]

Comparative Analysis of Vaporization and Coagulation Properties of a Hybrid Laser (Combination of a Thulium and Blue Diode Laser) Vs Thulium and Ho:YAG Lasers: Potential Applications in Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate

Temperature changes during laser lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser and novel Tm-fiber laser: a comparative in-vitro study