Abstract:Open access (OA) has emerged as a metamorphic force that is breaking down the walls of restriction to provide unimpeded access to scholarly research online to people around the globe at no cost. It not only disseminates knowledge to a much wider audience but also boosts visibility, transparency, citations, and quality assurance as its unrestricted access opens it to be critically assessed by a wider public1. Evidence-based learning and care are particularly critical in the field of neurosurgery, and neurosurgical research has paved the way for enhanced patient care2. Scientific and multidisciplinary research plays a crucial role in global neurosurgical services by characterizing the local liability imposed by neurosurgical diseases and formulating strategies to assess and tackle this burden3. Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) are already burdened with a lack of funding and resources for carrying out viable research, which creates many difficulties for aspiring researchers and authors to be able to materialize their research1. LMIC researchers who overcome the initial challenges of inadequate research resources within their institutions encounter subsequent financial hurdles in OA publishing in the form of high article processing charges (APC), compelling them to turn to traditional journals with limited access. Unfortunately, these traditional journals then become unavailable to the same researchers, creating constraints on academic information sharing1. As a result of limited access, more than a million scientific articles are pirated annually, with 69% of download requests coming LMICs4. APC imposed by the publishers serve as the biggest obstacle for aspiring researchers in LMIC. The expenses associated with APC are so exorbitant that most authors are unable to afford them personally, while their institutions lack the resources to provide sufficient funding5. The median fee for neurosurgical articles can be as high as $33006. On the contrary, some other journals that claim to support authors by removing APC for publishing covertly impose substantial charges posed as editing service charges5. These charges may seem trivial to larger institutions, but they pose a significant burden on smaller institutions present in LMICs, thus depriving neurosurgical students and neurosurgeons within the LMICs and around the globe of valuable research, which could have been able to supplement the knowledge of neurosurgery and aid in providing an overall improved neurosurgical service globally5. As a result, high-income countries (HIC) contribute a significant proportion to the neurosurgical literature3. Despite a recent bibliometric analysis indicating a hike in authorship from LMICs in global health-related publications, there persists a sizeable discrepancy between researchers in LMICs and HICs6–12. It was deduced in a study that in the past 5 years, LMICs have contributed merely 8% of the overall OA publications across 18 neurosurgical journals1. This is not fair; normally, an OA journal should reduce inequity and avoid problems and inequalities between LMICs and HICs where a lot of funding is available for research7. However, OA cannot solve methodological or ethical problems in completed research or publications. That is why in LMICs it will be crucial to conduct a good quality of research as well as improvements in quantity, which will allow the authors from LMICs to be competitive for international fund raises to support their research and publish it in an OA journal8. Therefore, the need for strengthening the capacity to produce relevant research work should be focused on LMICs. Unfortunately, authors from LMICs faced some challenges, such as implementation, funding, training, the development of adequate research methods, and being able to publish in an indexed OA journal and sometimes ends by publishing in predatory journal9,13,14. However, it will be possible to overcome these challenges and increase the authorship rate from LMICs by providing training on research courses (from basics to experts), from student to physician, with adequate mentorship4,10,15–18. There has been worthwhile efforts made by the WHO to facilitate free access of significant numbers of journals in LMICs. As part of the Research4Life initiative, WHO introduced the Health Inter Network Access to Research Initiative (HINARI) program that grants free electronic access to more than 3000 journals to institutions in LMICs19. Similarly the international development organization INASPis consistently advocates for access to published research by helping institutions in developing countries negotiate for free or discounted access to journals, hosting local OA journals, and supporting researchers in improving their skills20. Furthermore, in LMICs, authors should improve the implementation of research from a single academic center to a multicenter, getting funding for research that will answer a relevant question or novelty. Also, they should promote local and regional OA journals to be indexed and establish collaboration between HICs and LMIC editorial staff for expertise. Ethical approval Ethical approval do not required for this manuscript editorial. Consent Not applicable. Sources of funding Not applicable. Author contribution All authors have contributed equally in formation of all forms of manuscript. Conflicts of interest disclosure All authors have contributed equally in formation of all forms of manuscript. Research registration unique identifying number (UIN) http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx - for all human studies – free. Guarantor Bipin Chaurasia. Data availability statement Not applicable. Provenance and peer review Not invite.

The Current State of International Academic Partnerships in Orthopaedic Surgery Between High-Income and Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

The landscape of international oral and maxillofacial surgery collaborations from 1996 to 2020: a scoping review of the published literature

Evaluation of Low- and Middle-Income Country Authorship in the Global Orthopaedic Literature

Critical elements of international academic partnerships in orthopaedic surgery: a modified Delphi approach

Global Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Care: Perspectives Beyond the US

Opportunities for International Orthopaedic Volunteerism: An Exploration of United States and Canada-Based Nonprofit Organizations

Collaborative Initiatives in Neurosurgery Research and Publications Between High-Income and Low/Middle-Income Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis

Exploring the Evolution of Research Connectivity and Funding in Global Neurosurgical Publications

International publication activity in orthopaedic surgery over a ten-year interval

Systematic review of low-income and middle-income country perceptions of visiting surgical teams from high-income countries

Scholarly trends in global orthopedics research published through the journal of orthopaedics: A bibliometric analysis from 2013 to 2024

The Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries' Perspective on Global Neurosurgery Collaborations

Neurosurgical Challenges of Open Access Publishing in LMICs

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Field of Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery during 2002–2021

International Orthopaedics journal: A bibliometric analysis during 1977-2022

Motivations and impact of international rotations in low- and middle-income countries for orthopaedic surgery residents: Are we on the same page?

A Framework and Blueprint for Building Capacity in Global Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach

The current landscape of Neurosurgical Oncology in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC): Strategies for the Path forward

Partnering with Foundations, Philanthropy, and Universities with Programs Supported by Local Physicians and Eventually Local Physicians Taking Ownership

Peer review practices in academic medicine: how the example of orthopaedic surgery may help shift the paradigm?

Gender Trends in Authorship in 6 Major Orthopaedic Journals