Abstract:It is well known that people will exert effort on a task if sufficiently motivated, but how they distribute these efforts across different strategies (e.g., efficiency vs. caution) remains uncertain. Past work has shown that people invest effort differently for potential positive outcomes (rewards) versus potential negative outcomes (penalties). However, this research failed to account for differences in the context in which negative outcomes motivate someone - either as punishment or reinforcement. It is therefore unclear whether effort profiles differ as a function of outcome valence, motivational context, or both. Using computational modeling and our novel Multi-Incentive Control Task, we show that the influence of aversive outcomes on one's effort profile is entirely determined by their motivational context. Participants (N:91) favored increased caution in response to larger penalties for incorrect responses, and favored increased efficiency in response to larger reinforcement for correct responses, whether positively or negatively incentivized. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: People have to constantly decide how to allocate their mental effort, and in doing so can be motivated by both the positive outcomes that effort accrues and the negative outcomes that effort avoids. For example, someone might persist on a project for work in the hopes of being promoted or to avoid being reprimanded or even fired. Understanding how people weigh these different types of incentives is critical for understanding variability in human achievement as well as sources of motivational impairments (e.g., in major depression). We show that people not only consider both potential positive and negative outcomes when allocating mental effort, but that the profile of effort they engage under negative incentives differs depending on whether that outcome is contingent on sustaining good performance (negative reinforcement) or avoiding bad performance (punishment). Clarifying the motivational factors that determine effort exertion is an important step for understanding motivational impairments in psychopathology.

Challenging the law of least effort

An experimental manipulation of the value of effort

Too hard, too easy, or just right? The effects of context on effort and boredom aversion

Do humans prefer cognitive effort over doing nothing?

Need for cognition moderates cognitive effort aversion

Taking the path of least resistance now, but not later: Pushing cognitive effort into the future reduces effort discounting

Need for cognition moderates the relief of avoiding cognitive effort

The controllosphere: The neural origin of cognitive effort.

Decomposing the Motivation to Exert Mental Effort

Effort Expenditure Increases Risk-Taking for Improbable Rewards

When is Learning "Effortful"? Scrutinizing the Concept of Mental Effort in Cognitively Oriented Research from a Motivational Perspective

The cognitive cost of going the extra mile: How striving for improvement relates to cognitive performance.

Is "real" effort more real?

Overcoming Emotional and Attentional Obstacles: A Dynamic Multi-Level Model of Goal Maintenance for Job Seekers

A Motivational Perspective on (Anticipated) Mental Effort Investment: The Biopsychosocial Model of Challenge and Threat

Proximity to rewards modulates parameters of effortful control exertion.

The role of cognitive effort in subjective reward devaluation and risky decision-making

Motivational context determines the impact of aversive outcomes on mental effort allocation

Been There, Done That: the Impact of Effort Investment on Goal Value and Consumer Motivation

Dispositional cognitive effort investment and behavioral demand avoidance: Are they related?

Does effort increase or decrease reward valuation? Considerations from cognitive dissonance theory