Prognostic efficacy of non-invasive ventilation in patients with overlap syndrome: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and obstructive sleep apnea

Yang Gao,Zhengyang Fan,Hehe Zhang,Yuanni Jiao,Naima Covassin,Fei Li,Jiang Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-390
2024-08-31
Abstract:Background: Limited evidence exists regarding the effects of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on the prognosis of patients with concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), also known as overlap syndrome (OS). This study aimed to assess whether NIV alongside standard care could improve the prognosis of this cohort. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 229 patients with severe OS treated in Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2020, with follow-up until December 1, 2023. All patients were recommended usual care and NIV and were subsequently divided into non-NIV (usual care only) and NIV groups (usual care plus NIV) per their willingness and adherence to NIV. Endpoints included all-cause and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD)-associated death and re-hospitalization. Multivariate analyses were used to determine the relationship of NIV with prognosis. Results: The follow-up lasted for a median of 760 days (interquartile range, 245-1,374 days). Patients in the NIV group showed lower rates of all-cause (37.5% vs. 65.1%, P<0.001) and AECOPD-associated (31.7% vs. 58.7%, P<0.001) death compared with patients in the non-NIV group. Compared with usual care only, NIV treatment was associated with significant reduction in all-cause death [relative risks (RR) =0.459, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.315-0.668, P<0.001], AECOPD-associated mortality (RR =0.424, 95% CI: 0.283-0.635, P<0.001), and re-hospitalization for all causes (RR =0.455, 95% CI: 0.342-0.605, P<0.001) and for AECOPD (RR =0.421, 95% CI: 0.308-0.575, P<0.001) in Cox hazards models, with significance persisting after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: NIV may improve outcomes and survival in patients with severe OS of comorbid COPD and OSA. Confirmatory studies are needed to prove benefits.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?