Abstract:Objective::To compare the accuracy of total keratometry (TK) and conventional keratometry (K) for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation based on the new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry.Methods::This was a prospective self controlled study, 29 patients (58 eyes) with binocular age-related cataract were enrolled for the phacoemulsification combined with diffractive trifocal IOL implantation during May 2021 and November 2021 in Peking University People's Hospital. Eyes were assessed using a swept-source optical biometer (IOLMaster 700). Axial length, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, lens thickness, posterior keratometry, TK, and white-to-white corneal diameter were recorded. Emmetropic IOL power was calculated using K and TK in the current standard formulas (SRK/T, Haigis, Holladay2, and Barrett Universal II) and a new formula developed for TK (Barrett TK Universal II). Selected IOL power and predicted refractive outcomes were recorded. Corrected distance visual acuity and postoperative manifest refraction were measured 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. The absolute prediction error, mean absolute error, median absolute error (MedAE), and the percentages of eyes within prediction errors of ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated for all IOL formulas. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and McNemar's tests were used to analyze the difference.Results::There was strong agreement between K and TK (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.996), with a mean difference of 0.007 D. A relatively lower MedAE values were observed for Haigis and Barrett Universal Ⅱ for TK when compared with K. MedAE from TK was a trend toward larger than that from K in SRK/T and Holladay2 formulas. A relatively greater proportion of eyes fell within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of the predicted postoperative spherical equivalent range in the TK group than in the K group for Barrett Universal Ⅱformula. Proportion of eyes within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of predicted refraction were slightly higher in the K group for SRK/T, Haigis and Holladay2. However, differences in MedAEs, and percentages of eyes within the above prediction errors were not statistically significant.Conclusions::Conventional K and TK for IOL calculation showed strong agreement for refractive prediction for IOL power calculation based on IOLMaster 700, and with a trend toward better refractive outcomes using TK for Barrett Universal Ⅱformula.

Impact of quality indicators on variability of keratometry measurements using a swept-source OCT based optical biometer

Repeatability of total Keratometry and standard Keratometry by the IOLMaster 700 and comparison to total corneal astigmatism by Scheimpflug imaging

Short-term variability in ocular biometry and the impact of preoperative dry eye

Comparison of ocular biometric parameters between two swept-source optical coherence tomography devices and Scheimpflug tomography in patients with cataract

Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery

Comparing Standard Keratometry and Total Keratometry Before and After Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery With a Swept-Source OCT Biometer

Comparison of toric intraocular lens calculation with the integrated K method and three single biometric devices

Characteristics of surgically induced astigmatism after standardized microincisional cataract surgery with a superior limbal incision

Repeatability of biometric measures from the IOLMaster 700 in a cataractous population

Evaluating keratometry and corneal astigmatism data from biometers and anterior segment tomographers and mapping to reconstructed corneal astigmatism

Comparative analysis of a novel spectral-domain OCT biometer versus swept-source OCT or OLCR biometer in healthy pediatric ocular biometry

Comparison and evaluation of four different techniques of keratometric measurements

Accuracy of swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometry for intraocular lens power calculation: a retrospective cross–sectional study

Longitudinal Evaluation of Biomechanical Indices in Fellow Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus Classified as Having Very Asymmetric Ectasia With Normal Topography

Total keratometry for toric intraocular lens calculation: comparison from two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers

Precision (Repeatability and Reproducibility) and Agreement of Corneal Power Measurements Obtained by Topcon KR-1W and iTrace

Higher-order aberrations and visual quality after incision lenticule extraction surgery with intraoperative angle kappa adjustments between small and large kappa patients: A 2-year follow-up

Comparison of the Accuracy of Total Keratometry and Conventional Keratometry for IOL Power Calculation Based on the New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry

Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos® and IOLMaster 700®: Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers

Evaluation of the Repeatability of the Lenstar and Comparison with Two Other Non-Contact Biometric Devices in Myopes.

The Significance of Dry Eye Signs on Preoperative Keratometry Measurements in Patients Scheduled for Cataract Surgery