Abstract:Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Ahead of Print. Introduction:Endoleaks represent one of the main complications after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and can lead to increased re-intervention rates and secondary rupture. Serial lifelong surveillance is required and traditionally involves cross-sectional imaging with manual axial measurements. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging analysis has been developed and may provide a more precise and faster assessment. This study aims to evaluate the ability of an AI-based software to assess post-EVAR morphological changes over time, detect endoleaks, and associate them with EVAR-related adverse events.Methods:Patients who underwent EVAR at a tertiary hospital from January 2017 to March 2020 with at least 2 follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) were analyzed using PRAEVAorta 2 (Nurea). The software was compared to the ground truth provided by human experts using Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and Positive Predictive Value (PPV). Endovascular aortic repair–related adverse events were defined as aneurysm-related death, rupture, endoleak, limb occlusion, and EVAR-related re-interventions.Results:Fifty-six patients were included with a median imaging follow-up of 27 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 20-40). There were no significant differences overtime in the evolution of maximum aneurysm diameters (55.62 mm [IQR: 52.33-59.25] vs 54.34 mm [IQR: 46.13-59.47]; p=0.2162) or volumes (130.4 cm3 [IQR: 113.8-171.7] vs 125.4 cm3 [IQR: 96.3-169.1]; p=0.1131) despite a −13.47% decrease in the volume of thrombus (p=0.0216). PRAEVAorta achieved a Se of 89.47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.58 to 94.57), a Sp of 91.25% (95% CI: 83.02 to 95.70), a PPV of 90.67% (95% CI: 81.97 to 95.41), and an NPV of 90.12% (95% CI: 81.70 to 94.91) in detecting endoleaks. Endovascular aortic repair–related adverse events were associated with global volume modifications with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7806 vs 0.7277 for maximum diameter. The same trend was observed for endoleaks (AUC of 0.7086 vs 0.6711).Conclusions:The AI-based software PRAEVAorta enabled a detailed anatomic characterization of aortic remodeling post-EVAR and showed its potential interest for automatic detection of endoleaks during follow-up. The association of aortic aneurysmal volume with EVAR-related adverse events and endoleaks was more robust compared with maximum diameter.Clinical ImpactThe integration of PRAEVAorta AI software into clinical practice promises a transformative shift in post-EVAR surveillance. By offering precise and rapid detection of endoleaks and comprehensive anatomic assessments, clinicians can expect enhanced diagnostic accuracy and streamlined patient management. This innovation reduces reliance on manual measurements, potentially reducing interpretation errors and shortening evaluation times. Ultimately, PRAEVAorta's capabilities hold the potential to optimize patient care, leading to more timely interventions and improved outcomes in endovascular aortic repair.

Diagnostic accuracy of microvascular flow imaging ultrasound for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meta-analysis of the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the detection of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair

Is contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) superior to computed tomography angiography (CTA) in detection of endoleaks in post-EVAR patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Color duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison to MS-CT in the detection of endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair

Feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and classification of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

Dynamic Radial MR Imaging for Endoleak Surveillance after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Inconclusive CT Angiography: A Prospective Study

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in post-endovascular aneurysm repair endoleak detection using dual-energy computed tomography angiography

Detection of Endoleaks after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Value of Unenhanced and Delayed Helical CT Acquisitions

Ultrasound Coded-Excitation Imaging for Endoleak Detection After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

Evaluating the feasibility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detecting after preemptive coiling endoleaks in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: A pilot study

Dynamic Volumetric Computed Tomography Angiography is a Preferred Method for Unclassified Endoleaks by Conventional Computed Tomography Angiography after Endovascular Aortic Repair

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravascular Ultrasound versus Angiography in Abdominal and Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BMI-Adapted Double Low-Dose Dual-Source Aortic CT for Endoleak Detection after Endovascular Repair: A Prospective Intra-Individual Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Efficacy of ultrasound scan contrast agents in the noninvasive follow-up of aortic stent grafts

Type 2 endoleak embolization and utilization of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NCE-MRA) as a non-invasive imaging follow-up method.

Treatment strategies for endoleak after endovascular repair of the abdominal aortic aneurysm: A single center retrospective study

The Association between Plasma Proinflammatory Cytokine Concentrations and Endoleak after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Strategies for endoleak treatment after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A single center retrospective study

Implantable Pressure-Sensing Devices for Monitoring Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Use of Artificial Intelligence With Deep Learning Approaches for the Follow-up of Infrarenal Endovascular Aortic Repair