Follow-up Imaging in Angiography-Negative Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Michael Vogetseder,Verena Rass,Anna Lindner,Philipp Kindl,Mario Kofler,Lukas Lenhart,Lauma Putnina,Raimund Helbok,Alois Schiefecker,Bettina Pfausler,Astrid Grams,Ronny Beer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.158
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of follow-up investigations in aneurysm negative SAH patients. Material and methods: In 109 (25%) of 435 patients with SAH and initial negative DSA, the diagnostic yield of repeat DSA and MRI of the brain and craniocervical junction was reviewed. Results: Of the 109 patients with an initial negative DSA, 51 (47%) had perimesencephalic (PM), 54 (50%) had non-perimesencephalic (NPM) blood distribution, and 4 (3.7%) had CT-negative SAH. A delayed bleeding source was determined in 3 of 82 (3.7%) patients who underwent repeat DSA, and in 1/5 patients who underwent a third DSA. The bleeding patterns of these patients were all NPM (n=4). Repeat DSA did not identify a bleeding source in patients with PM-SAH. MRI of the brain and craniocervical junction after 2 days revealed a bleeding source in 1/105 patients (1%) in a CT-negative SAH. When all diagnostic modalities, including exploratory craniotomy and MRI of the spinal axis were considered, the rate of delayed diagnosis of the bleeding source was 6.4% (7/109). In addition to the bleeding pattern, patients with delayed diagnosis of the bleeding source were characterized by worse disease severity parameters, worse radiological grading scales, and more in-hospital complications than patients without delayed diagnosis of a bleeding source. Conclusion: The results of this study support the use of repeat DSA in patients with NPM-SAH, however, routine repeat DSA may not be indicated in PM-SAH patients. The routine use of MRI remains controversial.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?