Abstract:Large wildfires (>50,000 ha) are becoming increasingly common in semiarid landscapes of the western United States. Although fuel reduction treatments are used to mitigate potential wildfire effects, they can be overwhelmed in wind-driven wildfire events with extreme fire behavior. We evaluated drivers of fire severity and fuel treatment effectiveness in the 2014 Carlton Complex, a record-setting complex of wildfires in north-central Washington State. Across varied topography, vegetation, and distinct fire progressions, we used a combination of simultaneous autoregression (SAR) and random forest (RF) approaches to model drivers of fire severity and evaluated how fuel treatments mitigated fire severity. Predictor variables included fuel treatment type, time since treatment, topographic indices, vegetation and fuels, and weather summarized by progression interval. We found that the two spatial regression methods are generally complementary and are instructive as a combined approach for landscape analyses of fire severity. Simultaneous autoregression improves upon traditional linear models by incorporating information about neighboring pixel burn severity, which avoids type I errors in coefficient estimates and incorrect inferences. Random forest modeling provides a flexible modeling environment capable of capturing complex interactions and nonlinearities while still accounting for spatial autocorrelation through the use of spatially explicit predictor variables. All treatment areas burned with higher proportions of moderate and high-severity fire during early fire progressions, but thin and underburn, underburn only, and past wildfires were more effective than thin-only and thin and pile burn treatments. Treatment units had much greater percentages of unburned and low severity area in later progressions that burned under milder fire weather conditions, and differences between treatments were less pronounced. Our results provide evidence that strategic placement of fuels reduction treatments can effectively reduce localized fire spread and severity even under severe fire weather. During wind-driven fire spread progressions, fuel treatments that were located on leeward slopes tended to have lower fire severity than treatments located on windward slopes. As fire and fuels managers evaluate options for increasing landscape resilience to future climate change and wildfires, strategic placement of fuel treatments may be guided by retrospective studies of past large wildfire events.

Studies of Anomalous Ionization ∗

An optimisation approach for fuel treatment planning to break the connectivity of high-risk regions

Fuel treatment planning: fragmenting high fuel load areas while maintaining availability and connectivity of faunal habitat

Multi-objective Optimization for Exploring the Effectiveness of Building Mitigation Towards Reducing Urban Conflagrations

Fuel treatment effectiveness in the context of landform, vegetation, and large, wind-driven wildfires

Detecting critical nodes in forest landscape networks to reduce wildfire spread

Wildfire exposure and fuel management on western US national forests

The role of fuel treatments in mitigating wildfire risk

Designing a conceptual framework for strategic selection of Bushfire mitigation approaches

Comparing fuel reduction treatments for reducing wildfire size and intensity in a boreal forest landscape of northeastern China.

Balancing wildlife protection and wildfire threat mitigation using a network optimization approach

Fractional cover mapping of wildland-urban interface fuels using Landsat, Sentinel 1 and PALSAR imagery

Wildfire Risk Assessment for Strategic Forest Management in the Southern United States: A Bayesian Network Modeling Approach

Do Vegetation Fuel Reduction Treatments Alter Forest Fire Severity and Carbon Stability in California Forests?

Combined Estimation of Fire Perimeters and Fuel Adjustment Factors in FARSITE for Forecasting Wildland Fire Propagation

Learning from wildfires: A scalable framework to evaluate treatment effects on burn severity

Analysis Of The Uncertainty Of Fuel Model Parameters In Wildland Fire Modelling Of A Boreal Forest In North-East China

Balancing Wildfire Risk and Power Outages through Optimized Power Shut-Offs

Wildland Fire Mid-story: A generative modeling approach for representative fuels

Fast Optimization of Wildfire Suppression Policies with SMAC

Simulating spatial complexity in dry conifer forest restoration: implications for conservation prioritization and scenario evaluation