Abstract:Background The capacity of forest fuel treatments to moderate the behavior and severity of subsequent wildfires depends on weather and fuel conditions at the time of burning. However, in-depth evaluations of how treatments perform are limited because encounters between wildfires and areas with extensive pre-fire data are rare. Here, we took advantage of a 1200-ha randomized and replicated experiment that burned almost entirely in a subsequent wildfire under a wide range of weather conditions. We compared the impacts of four fuel treatments on fire severity, including two thin-only, a thin-burn, a burn-only, and an untreated control. We evaluated four fire severity metrics—tree mortality, average bole char height, percent crown volume consumed (PCVC), and percent crown volume affected (PCVA)—and leveraged data from pre-fire surface and canopy fuels to better understand the mechanisms driving differences in wildfire severity among treatments and how they changed with fire weather. Results We found strong mitigating effects of treatments on fire behavior and tree mortality, despite 20 years having elapsed since mechanical thinning and 10 years since the second entry of prescribed fire. The thin-burn treatment resulted in the lowest fire severity across all four metrics and the untreated control the highest. All four fire severity metrics were positively associated with pre-fire canopy and surface fuel loads, with the exception that PCVC (a fire severity metric related to crown fire behavior) was not associated with surface fuel load. The fire weather conditions under which fuel treatment was most effective varied among fire severity metrics. Fuel treatment benefit was maximized at intermediate burning index values for tree mortality, intermediate to high burning index values for PCVA, and high burning index for bole char height and PCVC. Conclusions We conclude that reducing canopy bulk density via mechanical thinning treatments can help to limit crown fire behavior for 20 years or more. However, reducing surface fuels is necessary to limit scorching and the total crown impacts associated with tree mortality. Further, while fuel treatment effectiveness may decline under the most severe fire weather conditions for fire severity metrics associated with tree mortality, it is maximized under severe fire weather conditions for fire severity metrics associated with crown fire behavior (bole charring and torching). Our results provide strong evidence for the use of fuel treatments to mitigate fire behavior and resulting fire severity even under extreme fire weather conditions.

Learning from wildfires: A scalable framework to evaluate treatment effects on burn severity

Fuel treatment effectiveness in the context of landform, vegetation, and large, wind-driven wildfires

Forest thinning and prescribed burning treatments reduce wildfire severity and buffer the impacts of severe fire weather

Few large or many small fires: Using spatial scaling of severe fire to quantify effects of fire‐size distribution shifts

Do Vegetation Fuel Reduction Treatments Alter Forest Fire Severity and Carbon Stability in California Forests?

Modelling wildland fire burn severity in California using a spatial Super Learner approach

Prescribed fire placement matters more than increasing frequency and extent in a simulated Pacific Northwest landscape

Long‐term efficacy of fuel reduction and restoration treatments in Northern Rockies dry forests

Examining the Impacts of Pre-Fire Forest Conditions on Burn Severity Using Multiple Remote Sensing Platforms

Modeling wildland fire burn severity in California using a spatial Super Learner approach

Using Sentinel-2 Imagery to Measure Spatiotemporal Changes and Recovery across Three Adjacent Grasslands with Different Fire Histories

Wildfire exposure and fuel management on western US national forests

Thinning and Managed Burning Enhance Forest Resilience in Northeastern California

Quantifying the effects of environmental factors on wildfire burned area in the south central US using integrated machine learning techniques

When do contemporary wildfires restore forest structures in the Sierra Nevada?

Characterizing Fire-Induced Forest Structure and Aboveground Biomass Changes in Boreal Forests Using Multitemporal Lidar and Landsat

An Assessment of Pre- and Post Fire Near Surface Fuel Hazard in an Australian Dry Sclerophyll Forest Using Point Cloud Data Captured Using a Terrestrial Laser Scanner

Detecting critical nodes in forest landscape networks to reduce wildfire spread

Wildfire Risk Assessment for Strategic Forest Management in the Southern United States: A Bayesian Network Modeling Approach

Severity of a megafire reduced by interactions of wildland fire suppression operations and previous burns

Good fire: quantifying the beneficial ecosystem work of western U.S. wildfires (2010-2020)