Abstract:Minors (subjects under the legal age, established at this study at 18 years) benefit from a series of legal rights created to protect them and guarantee their welfare. However, throughout the world there are many minors who have no way to prove they are underaged, leading to a great interest in predicting legal age with the highest possible accuracy. Current methods, mainly involving X-ray analysis, are highly invasive, so new methods to predict legal age are being studied, such as DNA methylation. To further such studies, we created two age prediction models based on five epigenetic markers: cg21572722 (ELOVL2), cg02228185 (ASPA), cg06639320 (FHL2), cg19283806 (CCDC102B) and cg07082267 (no associated gene), that were analysed in blood samples to determine possible limitations regarding DNA methylation as an effective tool for legal age estimation. A wide age range prediction model was created using a broad set of samples (14-94 years) yielding a mean absolute error (MAE) of ±4.32 years. A second model, the constrained age prediction model, was created using a reduced range of samples (14-25 years) yielding an MAE of ±1.54 years. Both models, in addition to Horvath's Skin & Blood epigenetic clock, were evaluated using a test set comprising 732 pairs of 18-year-old twins (N=426 monozygotic (MZ) and N=306 dizygotic (DZ) pairs), representing a relevant age of study. Through analysis of the two former age prediction models, we found that constraining the age of the samples forming the training set around the desired age of study significantly reduced the prediction error (from MAE: ±4.07 and ±4.27 years for MZ and DZ twins, respectively; to ±1.31 and ±1.3 years). However, despite low prediction errors, DNA methylation models are still prone to classify same-aged individuals in different categories (minors or adults), despite each sample belonging to the same twin pair. Additional evaluation of Horvath's Skin & Blood model (391 CpGs) led to similar results in terms of age prediction errors than if using only five epigenetic markers (MAE: ±1.87 and ±1.99 years for MZ and DZ twins, respectively).

Exploring legal age estimation using DNA methylation

A Path to Age Estimation through DNA Methylation

Assessment of DNA methylation from a single genomic region of ELOV2 is sufficient to predict chronological age

Forensic Age Estimation through a DNA Methylation-Based Age Prediction Model in the Italian Population: A Pilot Study

Chronological Age Prediction: Developmental Evaluation of DNA Methylation-Based Machine Learning Models

A novel strategy for forensic age prediction by DNA methylation and support vector regression model

Age Prediction of Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 Years: an Epigenome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation

Epigenetic Predictor of Age

Evaluation of DNA Methylation-Based Age-Prediction Models from Saliva and Buccal Swab Samples Using Pyrosequencing Data

Progress in Age Estimation Based on DNA Methylation

Age Prediction based on Blood DNA Methylation

Estimation of Human Chronological Age from Buccal Swab Samples through a DNA Methylation Analysis Approach of a Five-Locus Multiple Regression Model

Human Age Prediction Based on DNA Methylation of Non-Blood Tissues

Epigenetic‐based age prediction in blood samples: Model development

Age-related DNA methylation analysis for forensic age estimation using post-mortem blood samples from Japanese individuals

Age Prediction Using DNA Methylation Heterogeneity Metrics

Human Age Prediction Based on DNA Methylation Using a Gradient Boosting Regressor.

Predicting human age by detecting DNA methylation status in hair

Prediction of chronological age and its applications in forensic casework: methods, current practices, and future perspectives

Age Prediction of Human Based on DNA Methylation by Blood Tissues

Longitudinal prediction of DNA methylation to forecast epigenetic outcomes