Abstract:Targeted bisulfite sequencing using single‐base extension (SBE) can be used to measure DNA methylation via capillary electrophoresis on genetic analyzers in forensic labs. Several accurate age prediction models have been reported using this method. However, using different genetic analyzers with different software settings can generate different methylation values, leading to significant errors in age prediction. To address this issue, the study proposes and compares four methods as follows: (1) adjusting methylation values using numerous actual body fluid DNA samples, (2) adjusting methylation values using control DNAs with varying methylation ratios, (3) constructing new age prediction models for each genetic analyzer type, and (4) constructing new age prediction models that could be applied to all types of genetic analyzers. To test the methods for adjusting values using actual body fluid DNA samples, previously reported adjusting equations were used for blood/saliva DNA age prediction markers (ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, MIR29B2CHG/C1orf132, and TRIM59). New equations were generated for semen DNA age prediction markers (TTC7B, LOC401324/cg12837463, and LOC729960/NOX4) by drawing polynomial regression lines between the results of the three types of genetic analyzers (3130, 3500, and SeqStudio). The same method was applied to obtain adjustment equations using 11 control DNA samples. To develop new age prediction models for each genetic analyzer type, linear regression analysis was conducted using DNA methylation data from 150 blood, 150 saliva, and 62 semen samples. For the genetic analyzer‐independent models, control DNAs were used to formulate equations for calibrating the bias of the data from each genetic analyzer, and linear regression analysis was performed using calibrated body fluid DNA data. In the comparison results, the genetic analyzer‐specific models showed the highest accuracy. However, genetic analyzer‐independent models through bias adjustment also provided accurate age prediction results, suggesting its use as an alternative in situations with multiple constraints.

Age Prediction based on Blood DNA Methylation

A novel strategy for forensic age prediction by DNA methylation and support vector regression model

Age Prediction of Human Based on DNA Methylation by Blood Tissues

Human Age Prediction Based on DNA Methylation of Non-Blood Tissues

Chronological Age Prediction: Developmental Evaluation of DNA Methylation-Based Machine Learning Models

Human Age Prediction Based on DNA Methylation Using a Gradient Boosting Regressor.

DNA methylation‐based age prediction with bloodstains using pyrosequencing and random forest regression

Age Prediction Using DNA Methylation Heterogeneity Metrics

Predicting human age by detecting DNA methylation status in hair

Age-related DNA methylation analysis for forensic age estimation using post-mortem blood samples from Japanese individuals

Assessment of DNA methylation from a single genomic region of ELOV2 is sufficient to predict chronological age

Strategies to deal with genetic analyzer‐specific DNA methylation measurements

Epigenetic‐based age prediction in blood samples: Model development

An age classification model based on DNA methylation biomarkers of aging in human peripheral blood using random forest and artificial neural network

Evaluation of DNA Methylation-Based Age-Prediction Models from Saliva and Buccal Swab Samples Using Pyrosequencing Data

Age estimation using bloodstain miRNAs based on massive parallel sequencing and machine learning: A pilot study

Studies of hTERT DNA methylation assays on the human age prediction

Progress in Age Estimation Based on DNA Methylation

Forensic Age Estimation through a DNA Methylation-Based Age Prediction Model in the Italian Population: A Pilot Study

Exploring the correlation between DNA methylation and biological age using an interpretable machine learning framework

Predicting age from blood by droplet digital PCR using a set of three DNA methylation markers