[The effect of ultrasonic waves on ion permeation of biologic tissue; a contribution on the mechanism of ultrasonic therapy].

J. Lehmann,G. Becker,W. Jaenicke

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Clock Test Deficits Are Associated With Semantic Memory Impairment in Alzheimer Disease

T. Leyhe,Ralf Saur,G. Eschweiler,M. Milian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988709335798

2009-05-11

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Abstract:Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that Clock Test deficits in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) are associated primarily with the impairment of semantic memory regarding the appearance and functionality of a clock. To scrutinize this hypothesis, we developed a Clock Questionnaire that examined the semantic knowledge of the concept of a ‘‘Clock’’ and correlated scores from the questionnaire with performance in Clock Drawing, Clock Setting, and Clock Reading by healthy control participants and patients with mild cognitive impairment, early AD, and progressed AD. The Rey-Osterrieth-Complex-Figure is known to measure both visuospatial abilities and executive functions, and was chosen as a control variable. We found that deteriorated semantic memory best predicted Clock Test performance. In progressed AD, degraded knowledge regarding the appearance of a clock can explain the reduced ability to draw a clock face, while in early AD, impaired access to semantic knowledge about the minute hand might explain observed difficulties in drawing, setting, and reading the minute hand.
Robotic endoscopic resection: the next revolution in therapeutic endoscopy is already here!

Jérémie Jacques

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2450-9928

2024-11-13

Endoscopy

Abstract:En bloc resection of large superficial colorectal lesions offers significant advantages. Beyond enabling the treatment of early submucosal cancers with a low risk of lymph node metastasis, it also helps prevent recurrence, reducing the need for regular, costly, and stressful colonoscopy follow-ups for patients [1]. Additionally, this approach simplifies the optical diagnostic phase, eliminating the need to identify subtle mucosal and vascular pattern irregularities. Instead, it focuses on detecting amorphous areas, for which endoscopic resection may be contraindicated owing to a high probability of deep cancer infiltration. Furthermore, considering the environmental impact of transporting patients for their colonoscopy follow-ups [2], the strategy of en bloc resection as a one-time procedure appears more ecologically sustainable. Such follow-up colonoscopies also impair significantly work productivity [3]. So, despite these clear advantages for en bloc resection, why does piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) remain the most widely used technique in many countries? "Robotics has the potential to revolutionize therapeutic endoscopy by simplifying existing procedures and enabling the development of new ones that were previously difficult to perform without triangulation." The highly technical nature of en bloc resection, its steep learning curve, and the associated procedural risks explain its limited global adoption [4]. Performing resections via endoscopy presents intrinsic challenges, as the endoscopist is limited by the lack of triangulation, effectively functioning as a "one-armed operator." This limitation adds considerable difficulty to the execution of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) explaining why ESD has not become widespread. Although numerous traction devices have been developed to simplify, speed, and secure the procedure, none have yet achieved perfection. In this context, robotic endoscopy represents one of the most eagerly awaited advancements in therapeutic endoscopy. In the paper by Professor Chiu and his team published in this edition of Endoscopy , we are introduced to the first clinical results from a phase II study of robotic ESD [5] – a project that has been in development for over a decade. The EndoMaster EASE system comprises a Surgeon Console Unit (SCU), a Patient Side Cart (PSC), an endoscope, and flexible robotic instruments. The system features two remotely controlled arms: the right arm for cutting and the left arm for traction, allowing optimal exposure of the dissection plane. Notably, the robotic endoscope retains a working channel for standard endoscopic accessories. The study involved 45 lesions resected using the robotic system with the patients under general anesthesia. The technical success rate (defined as completion solely with robotic assistance) was 86.0%, with an R0 resection rate of 83.8% in patients who achieved technical success. The median dissection speed was 20.6 mm 2 /minute for lesions with a median size of 34.5 mm. The video accompanying the publication demonstrates the efficacy of the two-arm robotic system. While these early clinical results (phase II study) are not superior to recent data on the pocket creation methods [6] or traction devices [7] [8], the video provides an impressive showcase of the technology's potential. Similarly to advancements in surgical robotics, robotic ESD may not immediately surpass the expertise of the most skilled practitioners, who achieve R0 resection rates above 90% and dissection speeds exceeding 40 mm 2 /minute; however, robotic systems are likely to accelerate the learning curve for less experienced endoscopists and facilitate broader adoption of these complex procedures. More importantly, robotic endoscopy has the potential to enable the performance of novel procedures that were previously infeasible without triangulation, as well as the development of endoluminal suturing techniques that can close transmural defects in the digestive tract. Several limitations must however be considered, especially in light of the financial strain on healthcare systems worldwide. The cost of robotic ESD will undoubtedly be higher than that of traction-assisted ESD, raising concerns about whether the benefits of the robotic system will outweigh its financial burden. Additionally, the shortage of anesthesiologists and nurses is a critical factor, as the procedure has not yet been evaluated in patients not under general anesthesia and currently requires the presence of two nurses to assist. The inability to perform real-time optical diagnosis with the robotic system could also lead to inappropriate indications, as the endoscopist is required to make diagnostic decisions concurrently with the resection. Moreover, more than 80% of the cases in this study were located in the rectum or sigmoid colon, so the ability of the dev -Abstract Truncated-

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a detachable assistant robot: a comparative in vivo feasibility study (with video)

Sang Hyun Kim,Byung Gon Kim,Hyuk Soon Choi,Daehie Hong,Se Hyun Jang,Kihun Hong,Jin Woo Choi,Seung Han Kim,Jae Min Lee,Eun Sun Kim,Bora Keum,Yoon Tae Jeen,Hong Sik Lee,Hoon Jai Chun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08510-1

Abstract:Background: Appropriate tissue tension and clear visibility of the dissection area using traction are essential for effective and safe endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We developed a robotic assistive traction device for flexible endoscopy and compared its safety and efficiency in ESD between experienced and novice endoscopists. Methods: Robotic ESD was performed by experienced and novice endoscopist groups (n = 2, each). The outcomes included time to complete each ESD step, total procedure time, size of the dissected mucosa, rate of en bloc resection, and major adverse events. Furthermore, incision and dissection speeds were compared between groups. Results: Sixteen gastric lesions were resected from nine live pigs. The submucosal incision speed was significantly faster in the expert group than in the novice group (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the submucosal dissection speed between the groups (P = 0.365). No complications were reported in either group. Conclusions: When the robot was assisting in the ESD procedure, the dissection speed improved significantly, especially in the novice surgeons. Our robotic device can provide simple, effective, and safe multidirectional traction during ESD.
Hybrid versus Conventional Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SHORT-ESD)

Dennis Yang,Muhammad K. Hasan,Salmaan Jawaid,Gurdeep Singh,Yasi Xiao,Mai Khalaf,Yutaka Tomizawa,Neil S. Sharma,Peter V. Draganov,Mohamed O. Othman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002897

2024-06-25

The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract:Background: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD) which utilizes ESD knife along with snare-based resection, has been developed to overcome the technical complexity of conventional ESD (C-ESD). This study aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of H-ESD vs. C-ESD for non-pedunculated colorectal lesions ≥20 mm in size. Methods: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare H-ESD and C-ESD (Short-ESD trial). Patients with colorectal lesions between 20-50 mm in size were randomly assigned (1:1) to H-ESD or C-ESD. Primary outcome was procedure time/speed. Secondary outcomes were en-bloc and complete (R0) resection rates and adverse event rates. Results: A total of 89 patients (median age 63 years; 49.3% women) with median polyp size 30 mm underwent H-ESD (n=40) and C-ESD (n=49). The mean procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (41.1±16.3 vs. 54.3±28.2 minutes; p=0.007). The en-bloc and R0 resection rates trended lower in the H-ESD vs C-ESD groups (77.5% vs. 87.8%; p=0.26 and 72.5% vs. 79.6%; p=0.46) without reaching statistical significance. Adverse event rate was similar between H-ESD and C-ESD (10% vs 8.2%; p=1.00). Conclusion: Both H-ESD and C-ESD were safe and effective for resection of large colorectal lesions. H-ESD was associated with a shorter procedure time. H-ESD may represent a viable alternative to C-ESD, with the main advantage being easy applicability of a snare-based technique for colorectal lesions. Future studies are needed to further define the most suitable lesions for H-ESD, as to optimize efficiency and safety without compromising resection outcomes. ClinicaTrials.gov NCT NCT05347446.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Kinetics of water vapor sorption in porcine stratum corneum.

Z. Liron,H. Clewell,J. Mcdougal

Journal of Pharmacy and Science

Abstract:The kinetics of water vapor absorption-desorption was studied in the porcine stratum corneum (sc) at 25 degrees C. Dry sc samples were exposed to several relative humidities followed by exposure to dry air, and the change in weight was monitored over time by use of a thermal gravimetric analysis technique. Diffusion coefficients were estimated by simulation and data fit optimization to modifications of the non-steady-state solution of Fick's law. Very good fits of experimental data to theoretical equations were obtained. The stratum corneum-water absorption isotherm was characterized by a linear increase from the origin, extending to about 55% relative humidity (10% water gain), followed by an upward curve where water gain increased further by increasing relative humidity. Water absorption and water desorption in the porcine sc were asymmetrical processes, desorption being the slower one. Water diffusivity for the absorption process was related to sc water content in two phases. In the first (water gain < 9%) diffusion coefficients increased as water concentration increased. In the second (water gain > 9%) diffusion coefficients were independent of water concentration, equal to 1.17 x 10(-10) cm2/s. Water diffusivity in the desorption phase was shown to decrease linearly as sc water content decreased. Analysis of the absorption isotherm and of the derived diffusion coefficients suggested at least two forms of water associated with the sc. The first, termed "firmly bound water" and characterized by low diffusion coefficients, was most apparent with dry sc and with a sc water gain of up to 10%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
A131 ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF COLORECTAL ADENOMAS AND EARLY ADENOCARCINOMAS: OUTCOMES FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA

B Zhao,H J Kim,R Trasolini,D Chahal,E Lam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac036.131

2023-03-01

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

Abstract:Abstract Background Endoscopic resection is the standard of care for the management of colorectal polyps. Larger and more complex polyps require endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). While complications have been low, EMR is often piecemeal, resulting in indeterminant margins and often a higher recurrence rate. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic resection technique with a higher rate of en bloc resection. While more data exist for the resection of gastric lesions with ESD, ESD is becoming more widely used in western countries for the resection of colorectal lesions. Purpose The purpose of this study is to report on the outcomes and rates of complications for colorectal ESD completed in a tertiary centre in British Columbia. Method All colorectal ESD was completed by a senior therapeutic endoscopist who has previously received training in Japan. Retrospective data were collected on all colorectal ESD procedures done in St. Paul’s Hospital from July 11th, 2016, when the procedure first became available, to Aug 30th, 2022. Inclusion criteria were all adults who have undergone ESD for resection of a colorectal lesion. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18. Data collected included demographic variables, polyp characteristics, procedural outcomes, and complications. Result(s) A total of 39 ESD procedures were completed. The mean size of the resected lesion was 30.4 mm (range: 5 – 60 mm). Technical success, defined as successful resection of all polypoid tissue, was achieved in 35/39 procedures (89.7%). En-bloc resection was achieved in 27/35 (77.1%) of the completed ESD. The rate of R0 resection was 22/35 (62.9%). Curative resection, defined as technically successful ESD with R0 margin and no lymphovascular invasion, was achieved in 23/39 (59.0%) of the cases and the majority of the patients with non-curative resection that underwent endoscopic surveillance had no recurrence on follow-up. In our cohort, 3/39 (7.7%) patients had adenocarcinoma. None of the ESD resulted in any intra-procedural or delayed perforation. 3/39 (7.7%) patients had clinically significant post-endoscopic resection bleeding. Out of 24 patients that completed follow-up, 4 (16.7%) had recurrence at the resection site that was managed endoscopically. 4/39 (10.3%) of patients required surgery post-ESD. Conclusion(s) In our cohort, ESD is an effective endoscopic resection modality for the management of colorectal adenomas and early adenocarcinoma with a high rate of technical success and low rates of complications. Although the rate of curative resection was low, most were the result of R1 or Rx resection and a majority of the follow-ups in this subgroup demonstrated no further recurrence. The rate of en bloc resection is high, especially given the average size of adenomas in this cohort. Although ESD requires high technical proficiency, its favorable outcomes and low complication rates make ESD highly feasible for the resection of colorectal lesions. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Technical Feasibility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Lower Rectal Tumors

Wei Gong,Xiaowei Tang,Yutang Ren,Silin Huang,Bo Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201510001-01496

2015-01-01

Abstract:Introduction: Large (>2cm) rectal adenomas are usually treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery or endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection (EPMR). Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has demonstrated to be effective for the en bloc resection of colorectal lesions. We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of ESD for lower rectal tumors. Methods: Between June 2009 and August 2014, 39 patients with lower rectal tumors (≥2 cm) were treated by ESD at our department. Data were examined and analyzed retrospectively according to database and histopathological reports, with respect to histopathological diagnosis, procedure time, en bloc resection rate and complications. Results: The mean adenoma size was 45.6 ± 24.4 mm and the mean distance from the anal verge was 33.5 ± 16.2mm. Among all the lesions, 26 (66.6%) were laterally spreading tumors (granular type), including 2 homogeneous type (5.1%) and 24 nodular mixed type (61.5%) lesions, and the most frequent histological type was tubulovillous adenoma (17/34, 50.0%) (Table 1). The mean procedure time was 100.1 ± 64.3 minutes. En bloc resection and en bloc R0 resection were achieved in 92.3% (36/39) and 87.1% (34/39) of patients, respectively. Perforation occurred in 2 patient (5.1%), which was treated by endoclip. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 2 patients (5.1%) and was managed conservatively (Figure 1, Table 2).Figure 1Table 1: Clinical features of lower rectal lesions (n=39)Table 2: Clinical outcomes and complicationsConclusion: ESD is safe and feasible for the treatment of non-invasive lower rectal tumors, with a low complication rate. To prove its long-term efficacy, a multicenter prospective study with large volume should be conducted in future.Figure 2
Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Implemented Perioperatively in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Junliang Li,Guolan Kang,Tianxiang Liu,Zongshu Liu,Tiankang Guo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2022.0269

Abstract:Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) has advantages over traditional radical gastrectomy. We investigated whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are appropriate in the ESD perioperative period. Materials and Methods: We screened 129 consecutive patients, and 12 were excluded. All study patients underwent ESD for EGC. Of the 117 included patients, 57 received traditional perioperative care between January 2017 and December 2018, and 60 patients received perioperative care according to ERAS protocols between January 2019 and September 2020. The primary study endpoint was ESD-related complications. Secondary endpoints included the following postoperative parameters: anal exhaust time, incidence of nausea or vomiting, length of hospitalization, fever rate, abdominal pain on the visual analog scale (VAS), and reported perioperative satisfaction. Results: Complications were comparable between the 2 groups. In the ERAS group, no patients experienced delayed bleeding or perforation. One traditional group patient bled, and one perforated. Postoperative anal exhaust time, nausea or vomiting incidence, hospitalization, fever rate, and VAS pain scores were significantly lower, and perioperative satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the ERAS group. Conclusions: ERAS protocols are both feasible and safe for patients undergoing ESD. ERAS protocols enhance the advantages of ESD for EGC without increasing complications.
A Novel Endoscopic Hand-Suturing Technique for Defect Closure after Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Pilot Study

Seiichiro Abe,Yutaka Saito,Yusaku Tanaka,Mai Ego,Fumito Yanagisawa,Kazumasa Kawashima,Hiroyuki Takamaru,Masau Sekiguchi,Masayoshi Yamada,Taku Sakamoto,Takahisa Matsuda,Osamu Goto,Naohisa Yahagi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1120-8533

2020-01-01

Endoscopy

Abstract:Background This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) and attainability of sustained closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods EHS was defined as uninterrupted endoscopic suturing of the mucosal defect after colorectal ESD using an absorbable barbed suture and a through-the-scope needle holder. Following individual EHS training using an ex vivo porcine colonic model, two experienced endoscopists performed EHS.Repeat colonoscopy was performed on the third or fourth day after ESD to examine the EHS site. The primary end point was the complete EHS closure rate, and secondary end points were sustained closure and post-ESD bleeding rates. Results 11 lesions were included. Median size of the mucosal defect was 38mm (range 25-55mm) and the lesion characteristics were as follows: lower rectum/upper rectum/ascending colon/cecum=3/3/2/3, and 0-IIa/0-Is+IIa/others=5/4/2. EHS was not attempted in two patients owing to difficulty in colonoscope reinsertion after ESD and intraoperative perforation, respectively. EHS was performed for nine lesions, and the complete EHS closure rate was 73%. Median procedure time for suturing was 56 minutes (range 30-120 minutes) and median number of stitches was 8 (range 6-12). Sustained closure and post-ESD bleeding rates were 64% and 9%, respectively. Conclusions EHS achieved complete and sustained closure in the colorectum. However, EHS is not currently clinically applicable given the long procedure time. Further modifications of the technique and devices are desirable.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Clip Traction Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colonic Neoplasms: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Xiaotan Dou,Danndan Zhu,Chunrong Wang,Min Chen,Xiaoqi Zhang,Lei Wang,Chenggong Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3441

Abstract:Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colonic neoplasms is a technically intricate procedure. Internal traction using a single clip has emerged as a promising supportive technique for colonic ESD. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of ESD with and without the aid of single-clip traction. Methods: This retrospective study encompassed 36 patients who underwent single clip traction-assisted colonic ESD and 66 who underwent the traditional method of colonic ESD at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University. We employed the propensity score-matching method to mitigate disparities in resected specimen size and tumor location. Post-matching, we comprehensively assessed treatment outcomes and incidence of adverse events between the two treatment groups (single clip traction-assisted ESD (scESD) and conventional ESD (cESD)). Results: After propensity score matching, we observed 34 matched pairs. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups regarding the en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, and curative rate. However, the procedure duration was significantly shorter in the single clip traction-assisted ESD group compared to the conventional ESD group (20.00 [Interquatile Range (IQR)] (16.00-32.50) minutes vs 31.50 [IQR] (17.00-54.00) minutes, p = 0.0474). Furthermore, there was a significant increase in dissection speed in the single clip traction-assisted ESD group compared to the conventional ESD group (0.29 [IQR] (0.20-0.45) mm2/min vs 0.19 [IQR] (0.11-0.35) mm2/min, p = 0.0015). All lesions were resected in a single piece. Among the propensity-score-matched patients, only those treated with single clip traction-assisted ESD exhibited faster dissection speeds (p = 0.015). Furthermore, there were no substantial differences in adverse events such as intraoperative perforation, delayed perforation, or delayed bleeding. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that single clip traction-assisted colonic ESD is preferable to traditional colonic ESD, owing to its shorter procedure duration and faster dissection speed.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection-assistance robot: a miniature surgical manipulator for endoscopic submucosal dissection

Yaxian Kuai,Jie Peng,Jing Jin,Aijiu Wu,Derun Kong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2234-4160

2024-01-25

Endoscopy

Abstract:One-handed operation and gravity-induced blind dissection are technical difficulties in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures [1]. In order to reduce the difficulty of the procedure and minimize the risk of perforation and bleeding, we have developed a microsurgical manipulator, the ESD-assistance robot, which provides a "second hand" with auxiliary traction, clamping, and fixation functions during procedures. The ESD-assistance robot is composed of four main components: an end cap sheath tube, manipulator, servo driver, and command controller ([Fig. 1]). When in use, the end cap sheath tube is fitted at the front end of the endoscope, and the endoscope is extended to extend the sheath tube. When performing dissection, the micromanipulator is voice controlled to move in forward/backward and clockwise/counterclockwise rotational directions, to bend forward/backward, and to open/close the mouth of the clamp ([Fig. 2]); auxiliary traction is applied to the pathologic tissue, maintaining the surgical field of view, thereby improving the dissection speed and reducing the difficulty of the procedure. A 60-year-old man was admitted to hospital with gastric cardia mucosal lesions and underwent diagnostic excision by ESD. During the procedure, traction from the ESD-assistance robot was used to obtain a clear submucosal field of vision, and to facilitate dissection, hemostasis, and submucosal injection ([Fig. 3]), which together improved surgical efficiency ([Video 1]). Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AC E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/). This section has its own submission website athttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos. Article published online: 23 January 2024 © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study.

Salmaan Jawaid,I. Grimm,Y. Perbtani,A. Siegel,Andrew Y. Wang,M. Karasik,Dennis Yang,A. Aadam,B. Elmunzer,Roxana M. Coman,S. Ngamruengphong,Donevan R. Westerveld,A. Rostom,Mohamed O. Othman,A. Schlachterman,P. Draganov,N. Sharma,H. Aihara,B. Hoffman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.036

IF: 29.4

2021-02-18

Gastroenterology

Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Asia has been shown to be superior to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and surgery for the management of selected early gastrointestinal cancers. We aimed to evaluate technical outcomes of ESD in North America. METHODS Multicenter prospective study on ESD across 10 centers in the United States and Canada between April 2016 to April 2020. End points included: rates of en-bloc resection, R0 resection, curative resection, adverse events, factors associated with failed resection, and recurrence post-R0 resection. RESULTS 692 patients (median age 66, 57.8% men) underwent ESD (median lesion size 40 mm, IQR: 25-52 mm) for lesions in the esophagus (n=181), stomach (n=101), duodenum (n=11), colon (n=211) and rectum (n=188). En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 91.5%, 84.2%, and 78.3%, respectively. Bleeding and perforation were reported in 2.3% and 2.9% of the cases, respectively. Only 1 patient (0.14%) required surgery for adverse events. On multivariable analysis, severe submucosal fibrosis was associated with failed en-bloc, R0, and curative resection and higher risk for adverse events. Overall recurrence was 5.8% (31/532) at a mean follow-up of 13.3 months (range 1-60 months). CONCLUSION In this large multicenter prospective North American experience, we demonstrate that ESD can be performed safely, effectively, and is associated with a low recurrence rate. The technical resection outcomes achieved in this study are in line with the current established consensus quality parameters and further support the implementation of ESD for the treatment of select gastrointestinal neoplasms; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02989818.

Medicine
Surgical Robot for Intraluminal Access: An Ex Vivo Feasibility Study

Ryu Nakadate,Tsutomu Iwasa,Shinya Onogi,Jumpei Arata,Susumu Oguri,Yasuharu Okamoto,Tomohiko Akahoshi,Masatoshi Eto,Makoto Hashizume

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/8378025

2020-12-05

Cyborg and Bionic Systems

Abstract:Early-stage gastrointestinal cancer is often treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using a flexible endoscope. Compared with conventional percutaneous surgery, ESD is much less invasive and provides a high quality of life for the patient because it does not require a skin incision, and the organ is preserved. However, the operator must be highly skilled because ESD requires using a flexible endoscope with energy devices, which have limited degrees of freedom. To facilitate easier manipulation of these flexible devices, we developed a surgical robot comprising a flexible endoscope and two articulating instruments. The robotic system is based on a conventional flexible endoscope, and an extrapolated motor unit moves the endoscope in all its degrees of freedom. The instruments are thin enough to allow insertion of two instruments into the endoscope channel, and each instrument has a bending section that allows for up–down, right–left, and forward–backward motion. In this study, we performed an ex vivo feasibility evaluation using the proposed robotic system for ESD in a porcine stomach. The procedure was successfully performed by five novice operators without complications. Our findings demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed robotic system and, furthermore, suggest that even operators with limited experience can use this system to perform ESD.
A129 OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF SUPERFICIAL GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT NEOPLASTIC LESIONS FROM A TERTIARY-CARE ACADEMIC CENTRE

S Gupta,F Dang,Y Fujiyoshi,S Li,K Khalaf,G May,J Mosko,C Teshima

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.129

2024-02-14

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

Abstract:Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced luminal resection technique for dysplastic and early cancerous gastrointestinal (GI) tract neoplasms. By removing lesions en bloc, this method provides more accurate histopathologic evaluation of resection margins in comparison to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Superior curative resection and lower recurrence rates over EMR have been shown in addition to the benefit of reduced morbidity and mortality compared to surgery. While ESD has become well-established in Asia and Europe, its adoption in North America – and in particular Canada – has been slowed by multiple technical and economic factors including a scarcity of infrastructure, institutional support, and standardized training. Additionally, reproduced Canadian data corroborating its known global efficacy is currently lacking. Aims Our aim was to evaluate clinical and technical outcomes in patients who underwent ESD of superficial GI tract neoplasms at a tertiary-care academic centre. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study at The Centre for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy & Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Consecutive adults (age ampersand:003E 18) who underwent ESD of any superficial GI tract neoplasm from October 2017 to December 2022 were included in the study. Primary outcomes were rates of en bloc, complete (R0), and curative resections. Secondary outcomes were rates of recurrence and adverse events. Data was collected through electronic chart review. Results ESD was performed in a total of 308 lesions with a mean size of 2.5 cm (range, 1-7 cm). Gastric ESD was the most common (n=130), followed by esophageal (n=91), rectal (n=62), and colonic (n=22). Three patients underwent duodenal ESD. En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 89.2%, 84.7%, and 71.8%, respectively. 64.3% of lesions were cancerous on pathology (n=198), of which 48 had at least submucosal invasion. Rates of delayed bleeding and deep mural injury (DMI) requiring surgical intervention were 3.9% and 1.3%, respectively. Overall recurrence at the first surveillance endoscopy (SE1) was 3.6%. Conclusions En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates reported from this largest single-centre Canadian ESD cohort are comparable to existing North American data. Low rates of early recurrence and an adequate safety profile have been demonstrated with this emerging oncologic method of resection. Additional investigation is warranted to optimize lesion selection and determine long-term clinical outcomes to further establish this technique in the management of superficial GI tract neoplasms. Table I. Procedural characteristics, outcomes, and adverse events for patients who underwent ESD of superficial GI tract neoplasms. Funding Agencies None
Sa1585 Long-Term Clinical Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms

Jingjing Lian,Shiyao Chen,Lili Ma,Liqing Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.03.636

IF: 10.396

2013-01-01

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract:Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed to overcome the problem caused by incomplete resection by conventional EMR for early gastric cancer. ESD allows precise histologic assessment of the resected specimens, and it may prevent residual diseases and local recurrence. Although utilization of ESD in the treatment of early gastric neoplasms is very popular in Japan and Korea, clinical experience and preliminary results of the ESD have been rarely reports outside these countries. Here,we reported 66 patients with early gastric cancer or high grade intraepithelial neoplasm that were treated by ESD in our center.
Endoscopic hand suturing using a modified through‐the‐scope needle holder for mucosal closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Prospective multicenter study (with video)

Takeshi Uozumi,Seiichiro Abe,Yasuhiko Mizuguchi,Masau Sekiguchi,Naoya Toyoshima,Hiroyuki Takamaru,Masayoshi Yamada,Nozomu Kobayashi,Ryo Sadachi,Sayo Ito,Kazunori Takada,Yoshihiro Kishida,Kenichiro Imai,Kinichi Hotta,Hiroyuki Ono,Yutaka Saito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14808

2024-05-24

Digestive Endoscopy

Abstract:Objectives Endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) is a novel technique for closing a mucosal defect after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We investigated the technical feasibility of colorectal EHS using a modified flexible through‐the‐scope needle holder. Methods This was a prospective multicenter study conducted at two referral centers between June 2022 and April 2023. This study included colorectal neoplasms 20–50 mm in size located in the sigmoid colon or rectum. A modified flexible through‐the‐scope needle holder, with an increased jaw width to facilitate needle grasping, was used for colorectal EHS. The primary end‐points were sustained closure rate on second‐look endoscopy (SLE) performed on postoperative days 3–4 and suturing time for colorectal EHS. Secondary end‐points included complete closure rate and delayed adverse events. Results We enrolled 20 colorectal neoplasms in 20 patients, including four patients receiving antithrombotic agents. The tumor location was as follows: lower rectum (n = 8), upper rectum (n = 2), rectosigmoid colon (n = 4), and sigmoid colon (n = 6), and the median mucosal defect size was 37 mm (range, 21–65 mm). The complete closure rate was 90% (18/20 [95% confidence interval (CI) 68.3–98.8%]), and the median suturing time was 49 min (range, 23–92 min [95% CI 35–68 min]). Sustained closure rate on SLE was 85% (17/20 [95% CI 62.1–96.8%]). No delayed adverse events were observed. Conclusion EHS demonstrated a high sustained closure rate. Given the long suturing time and technical difficulty, EHS should be reserved for cases with a high risk of delayed adverse events.

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
ESD CYCLOPS: A New Robotic Surgical System for GI Surgery

Timo J.C. Oude Vrielink,Ming Zhao,Ara Darzi,George P. Mylonas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2018.8462698

2018-05-01

Abstract:Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for 1.5 million deaths worldwide. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic endoscopy technique with superior clinical outcome due to the minimally invasive and en bloc removal of tumours. In the western world, ESD is seldom carried out, due to its complex and challenging nature. Various surgical systems are being developed to make this therapy accessible, however, these solutions have shown limited operational workspace, dexterity, or low force exertion capabilities. The current paper shows the ESD CYCLOPS system, a bimanual surgical robotic attachment that can be mounted at the end of any flexible endoscope. The system is able to achieve forces of up to 46N, and showed a mean error of 0.217mm during an elliptical tracing task. The workspace and instrument dexterity is shown by pre-clinical ex vivo trials, in which ESD is succesfully performed by a GI surgeon. The system is currently undergoing pre-clinical in vivo validation.
Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms

Keiko Niimi,Mitsuhiro Fujishiro,Shinya Kodashima,Osamu Goto,Satoshi Ono,Kosuke Hirano,Chihiro Minatsuki,Nobutake Yamamichi,Kazuhiko Koike

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255675

IF: 10.396

2010-01-01

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) provides a high en bloc resection rate with less invasiveness than surgical resection for large or scarring gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, detailed outcomes in colorectal ESD are still lacking. The aim of our study was to elucidate short- and long-term outcomes of colorectal ESD.PATIENTS AND METHODS:310 consecutive colorectal epithelial neoplasms (146 adenomas, 164 carcinomas), in 290 patients, which fulfilled our indication criteria and were treated with ESD between July 2000 and December 2008 were studied. ESD was done by three skilled endoscopists. As short-term outcomes, rates of en bloc resection, en bloc plus R0 resection, and major complications were analyzed. As long-term outcomes, disease-free and overall survival were assessed in 224 patients.RESULTS:Rates of en bloc resection and en bloc plus R0 resection were 90.3 % and 74.5 %, respectively. Eight patients underwent additional colectomy due to histopathologically proven possible node-positive cancer. Intraoperative perforations occurred with 14 lesions (4.5 %), which were treated successfully only by endoscopic clipping. Emergent surgery was needed for one case of postoperative perforation. Blood transfusion due to intraoperative massive bleeding was required in 1 case (0.3 %). Postoperative bleeding occurred with four lesions (1.3 %), and was endoscopically managed without blood transfusion. Local recurrence was detected in 4 lesions (4/202 patients, 2.0 %); resection had been piecemeal in all 4. During a median follow-up of 38.7 months (range 12.8 - 104.2), the 3- and 5-year overall/disease-specific survivals were 97.1/100 % and 95.3/100 %, respectively.CONCLUSIONS:Colorectal ESD showed favorable long-term outcomes. It may largely replace colectomy for node-negative colorectal epithelial neoplasia.
Simplified robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal and gastric lesions: a randomized controlled porcine study (with videos)

Rui Ji,Jia-Lin Yang,Xiao-Xiao Yang,Shi-Chen Fu,Li-Xiang Li,Yan-Qing Li,Xiu-Li Zuo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.01.004

IF: 10.396

2022-01-01

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Effective countertraction is a main challenging issue in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Several countertraction methods have been developed to address this issue. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ESD using a novel simplified robot, the flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot (FASTER), with a traditional technique.METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized animal study. Forty-eight ESDs in 6 pigs were carried out at 8 different locations (gastric antrum, gastric body, lower esophagus, and middle esophagus) by the conventional method (n = 24) and by the FASTER-assisted method (n = 24). The primary outcomes were total procedure time, dissection time, and rate of direct-vision dissection. Secondary endpoints were completeness of en-bloc resection and adverse event rate.RESULTS: The total procedure time was significantly shorter in FASTER-assisted ESD than in conventional ESD (18.8 vs 32.8 minutes; P < .001). In contrast to the median direct-vision dissection rate of 73% with conventional ESD, the FASTER-assisted group had a significantly higher rate of 96% (P < .001). The number of sites of muscular damage was significantly lower using the FASTER-assisted method than the conventional method (6 vs 21, respectively; P = .018). This improvement was more apparent in esophageal lesions compared with gastric lesions.CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that using a simplified robot during ESD is technically feasible and enables the endoscopist to dynamically use countertraction. This device could significantly reduce procedure time compared with conventional ESD techniques.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions

MA Li-li,CHEN Shi-yao,ZHOU Ping-hong,XU Mei-dong,ZHONG Yun-shi,ZHANG Yi-qun,CHEN Wei-feng,HU Jian-wei,YAO Li-qing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2008.10.007

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of the technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in upper gastrointestinal lesions. Methods The patients with mucosal or submucosal lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract detected by gastroscopy were enrolled. Endoscopic ultrasonography and/ or biopsy were applied to confirm the size, location, and nature of the lesions. The procedure of ESD, involving the use of hook knife, insulation-tipped diathermic knife ( IT knife), and high-frequency electric coagulation, was as follows : first, identified the lesions by gastroscopy or mucosal staining and marked it with needle knife or argon plasma coagulation (APC) ; second, raised the submucosa through submucosal injection of indigo carmine and diluted epinephrine. Then, pre-cut the circumferential mucosa of the target lesion; finally, completely dissected along the submucosal layer. Acid-suppressing and mucosal protection agents were administered postoperatively. Follow-up endoscopy was taken at 1, 2, 6 months after ESD to evaluate the progression of the lesions. Results A total of 153 cases were enrolled from August 2006 to January 2008, of which 85 were mucosal lesions and 68 were submucosal ones. The mucosal lesions included 2 cases of ulcerating type, 48 of protruding type, and 35 of erosive type, with the diameter ranging from 0. 4 to 5. 0 cm (mean 2. 0 era). All the mucosal lesions were dissected through endoscopy, with the operation time ranging from 15 to 210 minutes (mean 55 minutes). One patient received emergency endoscopic hemostaais becauseof delayed hemorrhage, seven others were treated conservatively because of perforation. All the wound surfaces healed during the follow-up, including 4 cases of recurrence, of which 3 received second ESD, and 1 was referred to surgery. Among the submucosal lesions, 52 cases underwent endoscopic ultrasonography before ESD, and the others were diagnosed by postoperative histology. The diameter of the lesion ranged from 0. 4 to 4. 0 cm ( mean 1.2 cm). All the submucosal lesions were removed completely in 10 to 182 minutes(mean 41 min), except one patient was treated by endoscopic nylon ligation. Eleven patients were treated conservatively because of perforation, and one received surgery because of the uncontrolled bleeding. Conclusion As a minimally invasive method, ESD may present a novel and promising procedure in treating mucosal or submucosal lesions of upper gastrointestinal tract, with the advantage of achieving large en-bloc resections, low recurrence rate, and few complications.

[The effect of ultrasonic waves on ion permeation of biologic tissue; a contribution on the mechanism of ultrasonic therapy].

Clock Test Deficits Are Associated With Semantic Memory Impairment in Alzheimer Disease

Robotic endoscopic resection: the next revolution in therapeutic endoscopy is already here!

Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a detachable assistant robot: a comparative in vivo feasibility study (with video)

Hybrid versus Conventional Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial (SHORT-ESD)

Kinetics of water vapor sorption in porcine stratum corneum.

A131 ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF COLORECTAL ADENOMAS AND EARLY ADENOCARCINOMAS: OUTCOMES FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA

Technical Feasibility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Lower Rectal Tumors

Feasibility of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Implemented Perioperatively in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

A Novel Endoscopic Hand-Suturing Technique for Defect Closure after Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Pilot Study

Efficacy and Safety of Single Clip Traction Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colonic Neoplasms: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Endoscopic submucosal dissection-assistance robot: a miniature surgical manipulator for endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) in North America: A Large Prospective Multicenter Study.

Surgical Robot for Intraluminal Access: An Ex Vivo Feasibility Study

A129 OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF SUPERFICIAL GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT NEOPLASTIC LESIONS FROM A TERTIARY-CARE ACADEMIC CENTRE

Sa1585 Long-Term Clinical Evaluation of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms

Endoscopic hand suturing using a modified through‐the‐scope needle holder for mucosal closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Prospective multicenter study (with video)

ESD CYCLOPS: A New Robotic Surgical System for GI Surgery

Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms

Simplified robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal and gastric lesions: a randomized controlled porcine study (with videos)

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Upper Gastrointestinal Lesions