FactFinders for patient safety: Motor stimulation testing in lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy and radiofrequency neurotomy in patients with posterior hardware

Mathew Saffarian,George Christolias,Vivek Babaria,Jaymin Patel,Minh C Nguyen,Clark C Smith,David C Miller,Zachary L McCormick,Spine Intervention Society's Patient Safety Committee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100170
2023-03-28
Abstract:This series of FactFinders presents a brief summary of the evidence and outlines recommendations regarding the use of motor stimulation testing in lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy and performance of radiofrequency neurotomy in patients with posterior spinal hardware. The evidence in support of the following facts is presented: (1) Motor stimulation does not inherently protect against unwanted damage to the spinal nerve, exiting spinal nerve root or its ventral ramus due to a lack of sensitivity of this test for identification of electrode contact or close proximity to sensorimotor nerves. Even when motor stimulation is performed, verification of correct electrode placement with multiplanar imaging including a minimum of true anterior-posterior and lateral fluoroscopic views is a recommended safeguard. (2) The existence of posterior spinal hardware is not an absolute contraindication to radiofrequency neurotomy, but direct contact with hardware should be avoided.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?