Evaluating the quality of radiomics-based studies for endometrial cancer using RQS and METRICS tools
Luca Russo,Silvia Bottazzi,Burak Kocak,Konstantinos Zormpas-Petridis,Benedetta Gui,Arnaldo Stanzione,Massimo Imbriaco,Evis Sala,Renato Cuocolo,Andrea Ponsiglione
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10947-6
IF: 7.034
2024-07-16
European Radiology
Abstract:Abstract Objective To assess the methodological quality of radiomics-based models in endometrial cancer using the radiomics quality score (RQS) and METhodological radiomICs score (METRICS). Methods We systematically reviewed studies published by October 30th, 2023. Inclusion criteria were original radiomics studies on endometrial cancer using CT, MRI, PET, or ultrasound. Articles underwent a quality assessment by novice and expert radiologists using RQS and METRICS. The inter-rater reliability for RQS and METRICS among radiologists with varying expertise was determined. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess whether scores varied according to study topic, imaging technique, publication year, and journal quartile. Results Sixty-eight studies were analysed, with a median RQS of 11 (IQR, 9–14) and METRICS score of 67.6% (IQR, 58.8–76.0); two different articles reached maximum RQS of 19 and METRICS of 90.7%, respectively. Most studies utilised MRI (82.3%) and machine learning methods (88.2%). Characterisation and recurrence risk stratification were the most explored outcomes, featured in 35.3% and 19.1% of articles, respectively. High inter-rater reliability was observed for both RQS (ICC: 0.897; 95% CI: 0.821, 0.946) and METRICS (ICC: 0.959; 95% CI: 0.928, 0.979). Methodological limitations such as lack of external validation suggest areas for improvement. At subgroup analyses, no statistically significant difference was noted. Conclusions Whilst using RQS, the quality of endometrial cancer radiomics research was apparently unsatisfactory, METRICS depicts a good overall quality. Our study highlights the need for strict compliance with quality metrics. Adhering to these quality measures can increase the consistency of radiomics towards clinical application in the pre-operative management of endometrial cancer. Clinical relevance statement Both the RQS and METRICS can function as instrumental tools for identifying different methodological deficiencies in endometrial cancer radiomics research. However, METRICS also reflected a focus on the practical applicability and clarity of documentation. Key Points The topic of radiomics currently lacks standardisation, limiting clinical implementation . METRICS scores were generally higher than the RQS, reflecting differences in the development process and methodological content . A positive trend in METRICS score may suggest growing attention to methodological aspects in radiomics research .
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging