Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT)-based radiomics in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment

Mahayu Ismail,Mohd Ariff Mohamed Hanifa,Eznal Izwadi Mohd Mahidin,Hanani Abdul Manan,Noorazrul Yahya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-334
2024-09-01
Abstract:Background: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT)-based images demonstrate measurable radiomics features that are potentially prognostic. This study aims to systematically synthesize the current research applying radiomics in head and neck cancers for outcome prediction and to assess the radiomics quality score (RQS) of the studies. Methods: A systematic search was performed to identify available studies on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Studies related to radiomics in oncology/radiotherapy fields and based on predefined Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) criteria were included. The methodological quality of the included study was evaluated independently by two reviewers according to the RQS. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed according to subgroups. The P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 reporting guidelines were adhered to. Results: From a total of 743 identified studies, six original studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review (median =97 patients). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-reviewer on total RQS was excellent with 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.946< ICC <0.999]. There were no significant differences in the analyses between each RQS domain and subgroup components (P always >0.05). Numerically higher RQS domains score for publication year ≤2022 than 2023 and number of patients > median than ≤ median but not statistically significant. Conclusions: The number of radiomics studies involving CBCT and MVCT is still very limited. Self-reported RQS assessments should be encouraged for all radiomics studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?