A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association of high sensitivity troponin levels with outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Rupak Desai,Nanush Damarlapally,Srijan Bareja,Vaishnavi Arote,Srivatsa Surya Vasudevan,Kamya Mehta,Mariam Ashfaque,Yadeshini Jayachandran,Shrikanth Sampath,Alaknanda Behera,Archit Srivatsava,Shariq Nawab,Sriharsha Dadana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2401632
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: High-sensitivity cardiac troponins (Hs-cTns) are reliable indicators of myocardial injury, but their relationship with cardiovascular outcomes remains less understood. This study explored the association between adverse cardiac events and Hs-cTnT levels exceeding 14ng/L in patients with stable CAD. Methods: Thirteen pertinent studies were identified using specific keywords from a pool of 208 articles retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, spanning 2013 to 2023. The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality (ACM), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death (CVD), rehospitalization due to decompensated heart failure (RDHF), need for revascularization, and stroke. Comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) was employed to analyze the data for odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and both qualitative assessment (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) and quantitative analysis (Egger's and Beggs test, funnel plots) were conducted. Results: The analysis included 29,115 participants (74.72% male) with a mean age of 68.34 years. It revealed a significantly elevated risk of ACM among stable CAD patients with Hs-cTnT levels > 14ng/L compared to those with levels <14ng/L (11.2% vs. 3.3%; OR 5.46; 95% CI: [1.53, 19.54]; p = 0.009). Similarly, higher risks were observed for MI (10.9% vs 3.6%; OR 3.12;, 95% CI: [0.98, 9.95], p = 0.053, CVD (8.1% vs. 2.1%; OR 3.37; 95% CI: [1.74, 6.50]; p < 0.0001), and RDHF (6.62% vs. 0.92%; OR 9.46; 95% CI: [4.65, 19.24]; p < 0.0001). Notably, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) exhibited a stronger association with Hs-cTnT levels (18.2% vs 7.81%; OR of 1.89; 95% CI: [0.80, 4.43]; I2 = 97%; p = 0.14) compared to Hs-cTnI levels (20.1% vs 21.1%; OR 1.30; 95% CI: [1.03, 1.64]; I2 = <0.0001%; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Elevated levels of Hs-cTnT (>14ng/L) are significantly associated with increased risks of RDHF and ACM in patients with stable CAD. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to refine risk assessment strategies and mitigate cardiovascular mortality in this population.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?