Abstract:Landscape transformations largely due to human activities can alter structure and functioning of ecosystems worldwide. As such, the anthropogenically modified landscapes adjacent to protected areas create a sudden transition between human dominated landscape and the protected area. Consequently, due to such sudden transitions in landscape structure, hard boundaries or edges emerge which could influence local biotic interactions and animal behaviour. Here, we show that migratory species respond to anthropogenic activities/transformations occurring in landscapes adjacent to protected areas by moving towards the core of the park. As such, human footprint in landscapes adjacent to protected areas can jeopardise biodiversity integrity especially for narrow protected areas or wildlife corridors. Human activities are transforming landscapes and altering the structure and functioning of ecosystems worldwide and often result in sharp contrasts between human‐dominated landscapes and adjacent natural habitats that lead to the creation of hard edges and artificial boundaries. The configuration of these boundaries could influence local biotic interactions and animal behaviours. Here, we investigate whether boundaries of different degrees of 'hardness' affect space utilization by migratory species in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. We deployed camera traps along transects perpendicular to the national park boundary at three different locales. The transects were located in areas that consisted of two types of human–wildlife interface: a sudden transition from the national park into agro‐pastoral land use (termed a 'hard' boundary) and a more gradual transition mediated by a shared usage area (termed a 'soft' boundary). Camera traps were placed at 2 km intervals along each 10 km transect from the edge towards the core of the park and were programmed to collect images hourly between dawn and dusk between June 2016 and March 2019. We used a deep neural network to detect the presence of wildlife within images and then used a Bayesian model with diffuse priors to estimate parameters of a generalized linear model with a Bernoulli likelihood. We explored the binomial probability of either wildebeest or zebra presence as a function of distance to the boundary, the rate of grass greening or drying (dNDVI) and the concentration of grass protein. There was a strong negative effect of distance to boundary on the probability of detecting wildebeest or zebra; however, this was only observed where the transition from human‐dominated landscape to protected areas was sudden. Conversely, soft boundaries had little to no effect on the probability of detecting wildebeest or zebra. The results suggest that boundary type affects migratory species occurrence. The implications of these findings suggest that hard boundaries reduce the effective size of conservation areas; for many species, the area used by wildlife is likely less than the gazetted area under protection. The impacts may be severe especially for narrow protected areas or dispersal corridors.

Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour

Behavioural ecology at the spatial–social interface

Expanding theory, methodology and empirical systems at the spatial-social interface

The influence of social and spatial processes on the epidemiology of environmentally transmitted pathogens in wildlife: implications for management

Scale at the interface of spatial and social ecology

The Role of Animal Cognition in Human-Wildlife Interactions

The role of habitat configuration in shaping social structure: a gap in studies of animal social complexity

Population and community consequences of perceived risk from humans in wildlife

Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies

Mapping human‐carnivore coexistence: approaches to integrating anthropogenic influences on carnivore distribution and connectivity modelling

Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps

Carnivore community response to anthropogenic landscape change: species-specificity foils generalizations

Disturbance‐mediated changes to boreal mammal spatial networks in industrializing landscapes

Anthropogenic activities influence spatiotemporal patterns of predator-prey interactions

Predator in proximity: how does a large carnivore respond to anthropogenic pressures at fine-scales? Implications for interface area management

Response to sudden surge in human movement by an urban-adapted animal

Spatial-social familiarity complements the spatial-social interface: evidence from Yellowstone bison

Non‐local effects of human activity on the spatial distribution of migratory wildlife in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania

Linking human impacts to community processes in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems

Impact of joint interactions with humans and social interactions with conspecifics on the risk of zooanthroponotic outbreaks among wildlife populations

A vision for incorporating human mobility in the study of human-wildlife interactions