Abstract:Animal societies are shaped both by social processes and by the physical environment in which social interactions take place. While many studies take the observed patterns of inter-individual interactions as products and proxies of pure social processes, or as links between resource availability and social structure, the role of the physical configuration of habitat features in shaping the social system of group-living animals remains largely overlooked. We hypothesise that by shaping the decisions about when and where to move, physical features of the environment will impact which individuals more frequently encounter one another and in doing so the overall social structure and social organization of populations. We first discuss how the spatial arrangement of habitat components (i.e. habitat configuration) can shape animal movements using empirical cases in the literature. Then, we draw from the empirical literature to discuss how movement patterns of individuals mediate the patterns of social interactions and social organization and highlight the role of network-based approaches in identifying, evaluating and partitioning the effects of habitat configuration on animal social structure or organization. We illustrate the combination of these mechanisms using a simple simulation. Finally, we discuss the implications of habitat configuration in shaping the ecology and evolution of animal societies and offer a framework for future studies. We highlight future directions for studies in animal societies that are increasingly important in widely human-modified landscapes, in particular the implications of habitat-driven social structure in evolution.Significance statementThere is now clear evidence that simple processes can generate apparent complex patterns of social structure. However, while studies such as those on collective behaviour and social networks have been focused on processes involving individual decision-making, broader patterns of social structure and social organization can also be shaped by factors that have more fundamental impacts on the movements of animals. One set of those factors is related to the amount and spatial arrangement of both biotic and abiotic components of the habitat in which animals live. Examples include the configuration formed by habitat patches connected through corridors, by the presence of hard boundaries between habitat types or by the uneven distribution of resources, mates and competitors across space. In this contribution, we highlight the potential effects of these, which are becoming increasingly important as studies start being able to track populations spanning larger landscapes.

Spatial-social familiarity complements the spatial-social interface: evidence from Yellowstone bison

Scale at the interface of spatial and social ecology

Effects of the social environment on movement-integrated habitat selection

Interspecific Sociality Alters the Colonization and Extinction Rates of Birds on Subtropical Reservoir Islands.

Behavioural ecology at the spatial–social interface

Interactions between neural representations of the social and spatial environment

Expanding theory, methodology and empirical systems at the spatial-social interface

The role of habitat configuration in shaping social structure: a gap in studies of animal social complexity

Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour

Sparse movement data can reveal social influences on individual travel decisions

Intraspecific encounters can lead to reduced range overlap

Friends because of foes: synchronous movement within predator-prey domains

Bison and bighorns: Assessing the potential impacts of reintroducing a large herbivore to a mountainous landscape

Movement decisions driving metapopulation connectivity respond to social resources in a long-lived ungulate, bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis)

Personality homophily drives female friendships in a feral ungulate

Are nonsocial species more social than we think? Seasonal patterns in sociality in a solitary terrestrial carnivore

Spatial-Temporal Dynamics of High-Resolution Animal Social Networks: What Can We Learn from Domestic Animals?

A wrap-around movement path randomization method to distinguish social and spatial drivers of animal interactions

Social Familiarity and Spatially Variable Environments Independently Determine Reproductive Fitness in a Wild Bird

How territoriality and sociality influence the habitat selection and movements of a large carnivore

Active crocodiles are less sociable