Survey of Diagnostic Criteria for Fetal Distress in Latin American and African Countries: Over Diagnosis or Under Diagnosis?

Maria Paula Cateriano-Alberdi,Cecilia D Palacios-Revilla,Eddy R. Segura
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/27374.10034
2017-06-01
Abstract:Ajah LO et al., paper titled “Evaluation of Clinical Diagnosis of Fetal Distress and Perinatal Outcome in a Low Resource Nigerian Setting”, recently published in the journal, was carefully read by us [1]. This retrospective study (2008-2014) aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria for Fetal Distress (FD) by examining 3761 medical records of women who underwent cesarean section. Out of these, a subset of 326 (8.9%) were indicated due to FD, however only 29.1% (99/326) of newborns exhibited a first minute Apgar score of <7. Those results highlight the potentially high number of over diagnosis of FD resulting in unnecessary and risky medical procedures [1]. Since FD is a topic not widely and deeply investigated worldwide, its epidemiological data are limited and great potential for misclassification (over diagnosis or under diagnosis) exists. In our country (Peru), the prevalence of FD among pregnant teenagers has been estimated to be as high as 22% [2], which contrasts with the overall 8.3% reported in this article [1]. Because of this, we aimed to review the different diagnostic criteria reported in studies from Latin America and Africa in order to compare them.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?