Introduction and Validation of Low-Cost Ocular Biometry in Healthy and Cataractous Eyes Using a Thermally-Tunable Swept-Source Laser

Milana Kendrisic,Stefan Georgiev,Hemma Resch,Stefan Steiner,Matthias Salas,Tilman Schmoll,Wolfgang Drexler,Oliver Findl,Clemens Vass,Rainer A Leitgeb
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.026
2024-08-30
Abstract:Purpose: To introduce and validate a novel substantially lower-priced and rapid swept-source investigational optical biometer in healthy and cataractous eyes, employing a thermally tuned laser diode used extensively in cell-phones and data communication as an alternative swept-source. Design: Prospective accuracy, validity, and reliability analysis. Methods: Sixty eyes of 59 subjects (twenty-nine eyes of 29 healthy subjects and thirty-one eyes of 30 cataract patients) were enrolled in a prospective comparative study at the Vienna General Hospital between August 2021 and April 2023. Averaged intraocular distances were acquired in 2.5 seconds from datasets consisting of 5000 consecutive A-scans at a single position by a low-cost swept-source optical biometry (SSOB) system. Instrument repeatability was assessed via standard deviations (SDs) and coefficients of variation (COVs) of parameters such as axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and central corneal thickness (CCT). Healthy subjects and cataract patients were subsequently measured on the same day with the SSOB and a referential partial coherence interferometry (PCI) biometer (IOL Master 500, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) to establish AL inter-device correlation (r) for instrument calibration. AL and ACD as shared parameters between both biometers were evaluated for their limits of agreements (LoA) using Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Repeated measurements of AL, ACD, LT, and CCT revealed SDs of 18 µm, 12 µm, 12 µm, and 10 µm, respectively. All parameters except for CCT had a COV < 1%. Except for 1 eye with white cataract, 59 eyes of 59 study participants with various degrees and types of cataract could be measured with both devices. AL inter-device correlation was excellent (r=>0.99). The 95 % LoAs between both biometers were -0.14 to 0.13 mm for AL and -0.28 to 0.25 mm for ACD. Conclusions: Optical biometry using a thermally-tunable VCSEL swept source light source has the potential to provide clinically relevant biometric parameters at an unprecedented 100-fold lower price point than currently employed state of the art optical biometers, paving the way for compact devices in remote care settings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?