Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models and polygenic scores

Gilbert Jabbour,Alexis Nolin-Lapalme,Olivier Tastet,Denis Corbin,Paloma Jordà,Achille Sowa,Jacques Delfrate,David Busseuil,Julie Hussin,Marie-Pierre Dubé,Jean-Claude Tardif,Léna Rivard,Laurent Macle,Julia Cadrin-Tourigny,Paul Khairy,Robert Avram,Rafik Tadros
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae595
2024-09-01
Abstract:Background and aims: Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical and AF polygenic scores (PGS). Methods: ECG in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with preexisting AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping datasets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. Performance of ECG-AI, clinical models and PGS was assessed in the test dataset. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital dataset. Results: A total of 669,782 ECGs from 145,323 patients were included. Mean age was 61±15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2,301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC=0.62) and PGS (AUC=0.59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness-of-fit (likelihood ratio test p<0.001), with minimal changes to the AUC (0.76-0.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59±18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year) ECG-AI model performance= remained consistent (AUC=0.77). Conclusions: ECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and polygenic scores.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?