Abstract:Background: AF risk estimation is feasible using clinical factors, inherited predisposition, and artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis. Objective: To test whether integrating these distinct risk signals improves AF risk estimation. Methods: In the UK Biobank prospective cohort study, we estimated AF risk using three models derived from external populations: the well-validated Cohorts for Aging in Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology AF (CHARGE-AF) clinical score, a 1,113,667-variant AF polygenic risk score (PRS), and a published AI-enabled ECG-based AF risk model (ECG-AI). We estimated discrimination of 5-year incident AF using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and average precision (AP). Results: Among 49,293 individuals (mean age 65+-8 years, 52% women), 825 (2.4%) developed AF within 5 years. Using single models, discrimination of 5-year incident AF was higher using ECG-AI (AUROC 0.705 [95%CI 0.686-0.724]; AP 0.085 [0.071-0.11]) and CHARGE-AF (AUROC 0.785 [0.769-0.801]; AP 0.053 [0.048-0.061]) versus the PRS (AUROC 0.618, [0.598-0.639]; AP 0.038 [0.028-0.045]). The inclusion of all components ('Predict-AF3') was the best performing model (AUROC 0.817 [0.802-0.832]; AP 0.11 [0.091-0.15], p<0.01 vs CHARGE-AF+ECG-AI), followed by the two component model of CHARGE-AF+ECG-AI (AUROC 0.802 [0.786-0.818]; AP 0.098 [0.081-0.13]). Using Predict-AF3, individuals at high AF risk (i.e., 5-year predicted AF risk >2.5%) had a 5-year cumulative incidence of AF of 5.83% (5.33-6.32). At the same threshold, the 5-year cumulative incidence of AF was progressively higher according to the number of models predicting high risk (zero: 0.67% [0.51-0.84], one: 1.48% [1.28-1.69], two: 4.48% [3.99-4.98]; three: 11.06% [9.48-12.61]), and Predict-AF3 achieved favorable net reclassification improvement compared to both CHARGE-AF+ECG-AI (0.039 [0.015-0.066]) and CHARGE-AF+PRS (0.033 [0.0082-0.059]). Conclusions: Integration of clinical, genetic, and AI-derived risk signals improves discrimination of 5-year AF risk over individual components. Models such as Predict-AF3 have substantial potential to improve prioritization of individuals for AF screening and preventive interventions.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve how to more accurately estimate the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) by integrating clinical factors, genetic information and artificial intelligence (AI) - analyzed electrocardiograms (ECGs). Specifically, the researchers hope to test the following hypothesis: whether combining these different risk signals can improve the prediction accuracy of AF risk. ### Background Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia, which is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure and death. Early diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and preventive treatment (such as anticoagulant treatment) can reduce related complications. However, the existing screening methods have limited effectiveness in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and have not significantly improved hard - end - point indicators such as stroke or mortality. ### Research Objectives The main objective of the study is to evaluate whether integrating three different types of atrial fibrillation risk signals, namely clinical factors, genetic information and AI - analyzed electrocardiograms, can improve the prediction accuracy of the risk of atrial fibrillation occurring within 5 years. ### Methods The study used data from the UK Biobank, which is a prospective cohort study of nearly 50,000 participants. The researchers adopted the following three models: 1. **CHARGE - AF**: An atrial fibrillation prediction score based on clinical risk factors. 2. **Polygenic Risk Score (PRS)**: An atrial fibrillation risk score based on common genetic variants. 3. **ECG - AI**: An atrial fibrillation risk model based on artificial intelligence - analyzed electrocardiograms. The researchers evaluated the prediction performance of each model when used alone, and further constructed combined models, including two - component models (CHARGE - AF + PRS, CHARGE - AF + ECG - AI, ECG - AI + PRS) and a three - component model (Predict - AF3, that is, CHARGE - AF + PRS + ECG - AI). ### Results - **Single models**: - ECG - AI has the highest prediction performance (AUROC 0.705, AP 0.085). - CHARGE - AF is second (AUROC 0.785, AP 0.053). - PRS is the lowest (AUROC 0.618, AP 0.038). - **Combined models**: - **Predict - AF3** is the best - performing model (AUROC 0.817, AP 0.11), significantly superior to other combined models. - Among the two - component models, CHARGE - AF + ECG - AI performs best (AUROC 0.802, AP 0.098). ### Conclusions The research results show that integrating three different types of risk signals, namely clinical, genetic and AI - analyzed electrocardiograms, can significantly improve the prediction accuracy of the risk of atrial fibrillation within 5 years. In particular, the Predict - AF3 model has the highest prediction performance and has important clinical application potential, and can better prioritize high - risk individuals for atrial fibrillation screening and preventive interventions. ### Keywords Atrial fibrillation, Genetics, Precision medicine, Risk prediction, Stroke, Screening

Integrating Clinical, Genetic, and Electrocardiogram-Based Artificial Intelligence to Estimate Risk of Incident Atrial Fibrillation

Genetic Susceptibility to Atrial Fibrillation Identified via Deep Learning of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms

Single-lead electrocardiogram Artificial Intelligence model with risk factors detects atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm

Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models and polygenic scores

Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography predicts 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Artificial Intelligence Enabled Prediction of Heart Failure Risk from Single-lead Electrocardiograms

Artificial intelligence–derived electrocardiographic aging and risk of atrial fibrillation: a multi-national study

Deep learning based prediction of atrial fibrillation incidence from 1-lead ECGs: a model development and validation study

Innovative approaches to atrial fibrillation prediction: Should polygenic scores and machine learning be implemented in clinical practice?

Predicting patient-level new-onset atrial fibrillation from population-based nationwide electronic health records: protocol of FIND-AF for developing a precision medicine prediction model using artificial intelligence

Abstract 16426: A Risk Model to Predict Atrial Fibrillation in Diabetes Using Machine Learning: The ACCORD Study

AI-enabled left atrial volumetry in coronary artery calcium scans (AI-CACTM) predicts atrial fibrillation as early as one year, improves CHARGE-AF, and outperforms NT-proBNP: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis

Improving cardiovascular risk stratification with ECG-predicted risk factors in primary prevention

Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram for mortality and cardiovascular risk estimation: a model development and validation study

Atrial fibrillation risk prediction from the 12-lead electrocardiogram using digital biomarkers and deep representation learning

Improving dynamic stroke risk prediction in non-anticoagulated patients with and without atrial fibrillation: comparing common clinical risk scores and machine learning algorithms

Left atrial function for predicting atrial fibrillation: a machine learning approach

Artificial intelligence predicts undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source using sinus rhythm electrocardiograms

Electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence to identify prevalent coronary artery disease

Prediction of atrial fibrillation and stroke using machine learning models in UK Biobank

Clinical and Genetic Atrial Fibrillation Risk and Discrimination of Cardioembolic From Noncardioembolic Stroke