Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10, October 2024. Background:Given the growing concerns regarding objective measures of clinical outcomes, attention has recently been devoted to the establishment of clinically significant outcome (CSO) thresholds for patient-reported functional scores after rotator cuff surgery.Purpose:To retrospectively compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) and radiographic data between patients who underwent arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with and without long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) augmentation.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 43 patients receiving arthroscopic SCR between 2016 and 2020 were enrolled, including a biceps augmentation group (n = 27) and a nonaugmentation group (n = 16). Patients were asked an anchor question regarding their satisfaction and perception of improvements. PROMs of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores and radiographic data including magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiographs were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Anchor questions in CSO analysis for deriving the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and maximal outcome improvement (MOI) values were applied ≥2 years postoperatively.Results:Based on satisfaction responses, 17 patients were classified as satisfied, 16 as unsatisfied, and 10 as fair. Additionally, 13 patients felt they were improved, 14 changed, and 16 unchanged. Intergroup comparison based on patients' satisfaction and perception of change or improvement exhibited significant differences in all 4 functional scores in favor of the satisfied and improved patients. However, there was no significant difference in the ΔVAS scores between the groups. CSO analyses showed no significant difference in percentage of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds for the ΔASES, ΔConstant, and ΔSANE scores between patients undergoing arthroscopic SCR with or without LHBT augmentation. A significant difference was found in the percentage of patients achieving the MOI for ΔASES score with 70.4% in the augmented group and 37.5% in the nonaugmented group, respectively. The mean acromiohumeral distance (AHD) differed significantly between augmentation (8.1 ± 2.2 mm) and nonaugmentation (7 ± 1.9 mm) groups. The graft tear rate did not differ significantly.Conclusion:There was no significant difference in PROs and percentage of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS between isolated and augmented SCR groups. A higher percentage of patients achieving MOI and slightly greater AHD were found in the augmented group. Further evaluation is required to determine if there is any long-term benefit to LHBT augmentation of SCR.

Comparable Pain Levels and Functional Outcomes With and Without the Use of Dermal Allograft Augmentation in Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair

Outcomes of Isolated Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair Compared With Concomitant Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair and Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Editorial Commentary: Long-Term Follow-up After Endoscopic Gluteal Repair Plus Hip Arthroscopy Shows Durable Results Using Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Scores That Largely Exceed the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Ultrasound and patient-reported outcomes of rotator cuff repair with new acellular human allograft at 6 months and 1 year post surgery

A Comparative Study on Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft With and Without Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Augmentation: Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis

Parachute Technique for Dermal Allograft Augmentation in Open Gluteal Abductor Repair

Dermal Allograft Augmentation for Large and Massive Rotator Cuff Tears and Revisions: A Case Series

Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Patients with Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Undergoing Primary Repair Vs. Augmented Repair with a Gastrocnemius Turn-Down Flap

Double Row Hip Abductor Reconstruction with Fasciae Latae Transfer for Severe Trendelenburg after Hip Arthroplasty

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Reveals Superior Gluteus Medius Muscle Vitality After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Minimally Invasive Anterolateral Versus Lateral Surgical Approach

Bioaugmentation demonstrates similar outcomes and failure rates for arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair compared to revision without bioaugmentation

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Root Reconstruction With Gracilis Autograft Is Safe and Improves 2-Year Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes

No Clinically Significant Differences in Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction When Comparing Quadriceps, Bone Patellar Tendon Bone, and Hamstring Autografts of 9mm or Greater

Patients With Graft Tears Leaving the Tuberosity Covered Have Similar Functional Outcomes to Those With an Intact Graft After Superior Capsular Reconstruction

A preliminary study on the effects of acellular tissue graft augmentation in acute Achilles tendon ruptures

Functional Outcome of Single-Bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Peroneus Longus Graft and Hamstring Graft: An Open-Label, Randomized, Comparative Study

Gluteal Augmentation with Polymethyl Methacrylate: A 10-year Cohort Study

One Step Double Augmentation with Human Dermis Allograft and Homologous PRP in Misdiagnosed and or Chronic Achilles Tendon Ruptures

Determining the Safety and Efficacy of Gluteal Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications

Revision and Primary Meniscal Allograft Transplantations Provide Clinical Benefit at Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Matched-Cohort Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Reoperations, and Failures

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Arthroscopically Assisted Gracilis Autograft With Suture Reinforcement Technique and Transtibial Pull-out Technique in Treating Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears