Abstract:Background: Meniscus root tears lead to de-tensioning of the meniscus, increased contact forces, and cartilage damage. Management of older patients with root tears is controversial and the efficacy of different treatment options is unclear. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis who underwent an all-inside meniscus root repair technique versus nonoperative management for either medial or lateral meniscus root tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with a diagnosed posterior meniscus root tear who underwent arthroscopic repair (AR: 30 knees) or nonoperative treatment with observation (O: 18 knees) were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean follow-up, 4.4 years). The arthroscopic repair included all-inside sutures to reduce the root back to its remnant (reduction sutures), thereby re-tensioning the meniscus, and 1 mattress suture to strengthen the repair by reapproximating the construct to the posterior capsule. The data collected included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, Tegner, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Results: Medial meniscus root tears comprised 80.0% of the AR group and 77.8% of the O group. The average Kellgren-Lawrence grade was 2 in both groups. The baseline scores for the KOOS Symptoms subscale were lower for AR (50.2 ± 19.3) than for O (66.5 ± 16.1) ( P = .003), as were the KOOS Knee-Related Quality of Life scores (AR, 26.7 ± 16.1; O, 39.6 ± 22.1) ( P = .046). No differences were found between groups for the absolute values at follow-up except that follow-up Tegner scores were lower in the O group than in the AR group ( P = .004). Significant improvements were seen in the AR group from baseline to ultimate follow-up in average KOOS subscale scores ( P < .001), Lysholm scores ( P < .001), Tegner scores ( P = .0002), and VR-12 PCS scores ( P < .001), whereas the O group had a significant improvement only in average KOOS Pain ( P = .003), KOOS Function in Daily Living ( P = .006), and VR-12 PCS ( P = .038) scores. Compared with the O group, the AR group had a significantly larger improvement from baseline to follow-up in average KOOS Pain ( P = .009), KOOS Symptoms ( P = .029), and Lysholm scores ( P = .016). During follow-up, 3.3% of the AR group underwent a TKA compared with 33.3% of the O group ( P = .008). The hazard ratio of TKA conversion was 93.2% lower for the AR group compared with the O group ( P = .013). Conclusion: All-inside medial or lateral meniscus root repair showed improved functional outcomes and decreased TKA conversion rates compared with nonoperative treatment and may be considered as a treatment option for the management of meniscus root tears in older patients with moderate osteoarthritis.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Arthroscopically Assisted Gracilis Autograft With Suture Reinforcement Technique and Transtibial Pull-out Technique in Treating Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears

Medial meniscus posterior root tear reconstructed with gracilis autograft improve healing rate and patient reported outcome measures

An Improved Transosseous Pullout Suture Technique for Arthroscopic Repair of a Meniscus Root Tear

Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Root Reconstruction With Gracilis Autograft Is Safe and Improves 2-Year Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A matched cohort comparison of non-operative management, partial meniscectomy and repair

Functional, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Second-Look Arthroscopic Outcomes After Pullout Repair for Avulsion Tears of the Posterior Lateral Meniscus Root

Medial Meniscus Root Reconstruction using Gracillis Tendon Autograft in Managing Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Preliminary Case Series

Clinical, Radiographic, and MRI Evaluation of All-Inside Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Repair via Suture Fixation to the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Versus Partial Meniscectomy: Results at 3-Year Follow-up

Biomechanical Comparison Between Suture Anchor and Transtibial Pull-out Repair for Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears

Risk factors of incomplete healing following medial meniscus posterior root tear repair with gracilis tendon

Comparative Efficacy of Root Repair versus Partial Meniscectomy and Observation for Patients with Meniscus Root Tears

Meniscus Graft Augmentation for a Midsubstance Tear of the Medial Collateral Ligament During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear Treatment: A Matched Cohort Comparison of Nonoperative Management, Partial Meniscectomy, and Repair

Clinical evaluation of suture materials for transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear

Biomechanical Comparison of an All-Inside Meniscal Repair Device Construct Versus Pullout Sutures for Arthroscopic Transtibial Repair of Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tears: A Matched-Pair Cadaveric Study

Inside-Out Repair of the Meniscus in Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures

Transtibial Pullout for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Reconstruction With Split-Gracilis Autograft

Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Versus Observation in Older Patients With Meniscus Root Tears

The modified cross-suture technique for unilateral pulled-out anchor during all-inside meniscal repair

Suture configuration techniques have no effect on mid-term clinical outcomes of arthroscopic meniscus root repairs

Medial meniscus posterior root repairs: A comparison among three surgical techniques in short-term clinical outcomes and arthroscopic meniscal healing scores