Risk factors, morbidity and mortality in association with Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) and Restrictive Spirometric Pattern (RSP)

Lucia Cestelli,Ane Johannessen,Amund Gulsvik,Knut Stavem,Rune Nielsen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.08.026
IF: 9.6
2024-08-27
Chest
Abstract:Background: Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) and Restrictive Spirometric Pattern (RSP) are often considered interchangeable in identifying restrictive impairment in spirometry. Research question: Do PRISm and RSP have different individual associations with risk factors, morbidity, and mortality? Study design and methods: In a cross-sectional and longitudinal study, including 26,091 30-46-year-old Norwegian general population men, we explored the association of PRISm and RSP with smoking habits, BMI, education, respiratory symptoms, self-reported cardiopulmonary disease, and mortality after 26 years of follow-up. PRISm was defined as FEV1/FVC ≥ lower limit of normal (LLN) & FEV1<LLN, RSP as FEV1/FVC≥LLN & FVC<LLN. We compared the associations of PRISm and RSP to airflow obstruction and normal spirometry, both as mutually (PRISm-alone, RSP-alone) and non-mutually exclusive (PRISm, RSP) categories, adjusting for age, BMI, smoking, education. We also conducted sensitivity analyses using GOLD criteria to define spirometric abnormalities. Results: The prevalence of the mutually exclusive spirometric patterns was: normal 82.4%, obstruction 11.0%, PRISm-alone 1.4%, RSP-alone 1.7%, PRISm+RSP 3.5%. PRISm-alone subjects were frequently obese (11.2%), current or former smokers, commonly reporting cough, phlegm, wheeze, asthma, and bronchitis. RSP-alone subjects were both obese (14.6%) and underweight (2.9%), with increased breathlessness, but similar smoking habits to subjects with normal spirometry. The prevalence of heart disease was 4.6% in PRISm-alone, 2.7% in RSP-alone and 1.6% in obstruction. With normal spirometry as a reference, RSP-alone had increased all-cause (HR 1.57 (1.21-2.04 95%CI), cardiovascular (1.48 (0.88-2.48)), diabetes (6.43 (1.88-21.97)), and cancer (excl. lung) mortality (1.51 (0.95-2.42)). PRISm-alone had increased respiratory disease mortality (HR 4.00 (1.22-13.16 95%CI)). Subjects with PRISm+RSP had intermediate characteristics and the worst prognosis. Findings were overall confirmed with non-mutually exclusive categories and GOLD criteria. Interpretation: PRISm and RSP are spirometric patterns with distinct risk factors, morbidity and mortality, which should be differentiated in future studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?