Trend of prevalence and characteristics of preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm): Nationwide population-based survey between 2010 and 2019

Hyunji Choi,Chul-Ho Oak,Mann-Hong Jung,Tae-Won Jang,Sung-Jin Nam,Taemin Yoon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307302
IF: 3.7
2024-07-23
PLoS ONE
Abstract:Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, trends, and factors of preserved ratio with impaired spirometry (PRISm) by using a nationally representative sample. Patients and methods: The datasets of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-2019 were used: of total 32,949 participants aged ≥40 and no missing data on spirometry, 24,523 with normal, 4,623 with obstructive, and 3,803 with PRISm were identified. PRISm was defined as FEV1/FVC ≥70% and FEV1% of the predicted value (%pred) <80. PRISm-lower limit of normal (LLN) was defined when FEV1/FVC ≥LLN and FEV1 <LLN. The prevalence and trend of PRISm were estimated using the Joinpoint regression method. The trend was calculated for the periods 2010-2015 and 2017-2019, due to a change in spirometry device in June, 2016. A complex sample multivariable-adjusted regression model was used to identify factors associating PRISm. Results: Estimated average prevalence of PRISm was 10.4% (PRISm-LLN 11.1%). Joinpoint regression analyses found a relatively stable trend of PRISm for both fixed ratio and LLN. The multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model showed female sex, BMI ≥25 kg/m2, metabolic syndrome, hypertriglyceridemia, abdominal obesity, low HDL-choleterol, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with the increased probability of PRISm. Conclusion: Whenever a PRISm pattern is identified in a clinical context, it may be necessary to measure absolute lung volumes to investigate underlying physiological abnormalities and to identify factors that is modifiable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?