ANTIBIOTIC FEED ADDITIVES : POLITICS AND SCIENCE

H. Cervantes,H. Cervantes
Abstract:The debate regarding the use of antibiotic feed additives in food-producing animals has intensified in recent years fueled by activist groups opposed to conventional animal agriculture that use this issue, as well as those of food safety, animal welfare and environmental pollution to further their cause, scare the public and ultimately impose their views on society. In the author’s opinion, the goal of some of the most extreme activist groups is to convert the entire society to vegetarianism. The media in general and some politicians have seized the opportunity to gain higher ratings and more votes by sensationalized reporting and legislative proposals to restrict their use in the USA (HR962; S-549). In spite of more than 50 years of use and an endless search for a “smoking gun”, to the author’s knowledge, to this date, not a single human fatality has been linked directly and unequivocally to the use of antibiotic feed additives in food animal production. Contrary to public perception, the continued use of antibiotic feed additives is beneficial for both, animal and human health. As detailed in this article, there are numerous scientifically documented benefits derived directly from their use such as the prevention and control of enteric diseases, enhanced food safety, improved animal welfare, preservation and less contamination of the environment, improved efficiency of production and lower cost of production resulting in lower prices for the consumers who can continue to enjoy an abundant supply of safe and nutritious food products of animal origin at an affordable price.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?