Internal jugular vein cannulation: Time required under ultrasonographic guidance with a valsalva maneuver

C. Miyake,T. Arai,K. Mori

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0054010050068

Journal of Anesthesia

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Lack of gallium uptake in primary hepatic amyloidosis.

T. Goergen,A. Taylor,N. Alazraki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.126.6.1246

1976-06-01

Abstract:99mTc-sulfur colloid and 67Ga citrate hepatic scintigrams showed matching defects in a patient with diffuse primary amyloidosis. Amyloidosis should be added to the usual differential diagnosis of such matching lesions which includes cysts, fibrosis, most benign tumors, and occasional metastatic lesions which do not concentrate gallium.
Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Claudio Bianchini Massoni,Stefano Ancetti,Paolo Perini,Paolo Spath,Rita Maria D'Ospina,Enrico Gallitto,Gian Luca Faggioli,Antonio Freyrie,Mauro Gargiulo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2022.06.101

Abstract:Background: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), currently the preferred treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), has been described also for penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) of the infrarenal aorta. However, data on its performance in this particular setting are still sparse in the literature. Aim of this study is to compare patient clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features, and post-operative outcomes between infrarenal PAU and AAA treated by standard EVAR. Methods: In this retrospective observational case-control multicenter study, the patients treated for infrarenal PAU (G1) with EVAR in 2 high-volume European centers from January 2014 to December 2019 were prospectively entered into a dedicated database and retrospectively analyzed. A 4-fold control group (G2) of infrarenal AAA patients, homogeneous for age and gender, was also considered. Preoperative clinical characteristics, aorto-iliac features (rupture, aortic maximum diameter, proximal neck diameter and length, aortic bifurcation diameter, distance between the lowest renal artery and the aortic bifurcation [RA-AoBi], severe aortic calcification), technical success, 30-day (morbidity, reintervention, complications, mortality) and follow-up outcomes (freedom from reintervention [FFR] and survival) were compared in the 2 groups (chi square/Fisher exact test, t-student test, Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis). Results: Seventy-three patients (age 78 ± 7 years; male 84.9%) were included in G1 and 299 (age 78.4 ± 6.6 years; male 89.3%) in G2. At the time of diagnosis, G1 patients were more often symptomatic compared with G2 (odds ratio OR 10.21, 95% confidence interval CI 4.17-24.99, P < 0.001). At preoperative computed tomography angiography, G1 patients had more ruptures (OR 8.11, 95% CI 3.50-18.78, P < 0.001), smaller maximum diameter (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, P < 0.001), longer and narrower proximal neck (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, P = 0.020 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.32-1.64, P < 0.001, respectively) narrower aortic bifurcation (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.24-1.45, P < 0.001), lower RA-AoBi (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07-1.12, P < 0.001), and more severe aortic calcification (OR 57, 95% CI 16-198, P = 0.001). Technical success (G1 98.6% vs G2 95.7% P = 0.320), 30-day morbidity (G1 2.7% vs G2 8.7% P = 0.133), reintervention (G1 2.7% vs G2 2.3% P = 0.691), complications (G1 6.8% vs G2 8% P = 0.737) and mortality (G1 1.4% vs 2% P = 0.720) were comparable in the 2 groups. The mean follow-up was 17.7 ± 16.4 months in G1 and 18.8 ± 15.1 in G2 (P = 0.576). Late FFR and survival were comparable in the 2 groups (1-year FFR: G1 94.8% vs G2 97.5%, P = 0.995; 1-year survival: G1 91.7% vs G2 92.3%, P = 0.960). Conclusions: Infrarenal PAU are more often symptomatic with a higher rupture rate compared to infrarenal AAA. Despite some negative anatomical characteristics (narrower aortic bifurcation, lower RA-AoBi, extensive calcification), the results of EVAR are extremely satisfactory in this setting, suggesting that endovascular exclusion could be considered a valid treatment for infrarenal PAU.
Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

Weixue Huo,Mengwei He,Xianhao Bao,Ye Lu,Wen Tian,Jiaxuan Feng,Zhaoxiang Zeng,Rui Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5592622

2023-09-20

Emergency Medicine International

Abstract:Objective. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular treatment for nondissected diseases of the ascending aorta. Data Sources. PubMed, Embase, and SciELO. Review Methods. In this study, we conducted a search on the PubMed, Embase, and SciELO databases for all cases of ascending aortic endovascular repair included in the literature published between January 2007 and July 2023, excluding type A aortic dissection. We reviewed 56 case reports and 7 observational studies included in this study, assessing the techniques, equipment, procedural steps, and results. We summarized the age, complications, follow-up time, and access route. Results. This study includes 63 articles reporting 105 patients (mean age: 64.96 ± 17.08 years) who received endovascular repair for nondissected ascending aortic disease. The types of disease include aneurysm (N = 16), pseudoaneurysm (N = 71), penetrating aortic ulcer (N = 10), intramural hematoma (N = 2), thrombosis (N = 2), iatrogenic coarctation (N = 1), and rupture of the aorta (N = 3). The success rate of surgery is 99.05% (104/105). Complications include endoleak (10.48%, 11/105), stroke (5.71%, 6/105), postoperative infection (1.91%, 2/105), acute renal failure (0.95%, 1/105), aortic rupture (0.95%, 1/105), thrombosis (0.95%, 1/105), and splenic infarction (0.95%, 1/105). Five patients required conversion to open surgery, two patients underwent endovascular reintervention, and four of these five patients underwent surgery due to endoleak. Early mortality was 2.86% (3/105). Conclusion. While the viability and results of endovascular repair for the treatment of ascending aortic disease are acknowledged in some circumstances, further research is needed to determine the safety and effectiveness of endovascular treatment for ascending aortic disease.

emergency medicine
Over 20 years experience with aortic homograft in aortic valve replacement during acute infective endocarditis

Silvia Solari,Stefano Mastrobuoni,Laurent De Kerchove,Emiliano Navarra,Parla Astarci,Philippe Noirhomme,Alain Poncelet,Ramadan Jashari,Jean Rubay,Gebrine El Khoury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezw175

Abstract:Objectives: Despite the controversy, the aortic homograft is supposedly the best option in acute infective endocarditis (AIE), due to its resistance to reinfection. However, the technical complexity and the risk of structural deterioration over time have limited its utilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of aortic homograft for the treatment of infective endocarditis in our institution with particular attention to predictors of survival and homograft reoperation. Methods: The cohort includes 112 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with an aortic homograft for AIE between January 1990 and December 2014. Results: Fifteen patients (13.4%) died during the first 30 days after the operation. Two patients were lost to follow-up after discharge from the hospital; therefore, 95 patients were available for long-term analysis. The median duration of follow-up was 7.8 years (IQR 4.7-17.6). Five patients (5.3%) suffered a recurrence of infective endocarditis (1 relapse and 4 new episodes). Sixteen patients (16.8%) were reoperated for structural valve degeneration (SVD; n = 14, 87.5%) or for infection recurrence (n = 2, 12.5%). Freedom from homograft reoperation for infective endocarditis or structural homograft degeneration at 10 and 15 years postoperatively was 86.3 ± 5.5 and 47.3 ± 11.0%, respectively. For patients requiring homograft reoperation, the median interval to reintervention was 11.6 years (IQR 8.3-14.5). Long-term survival was 63.6% (95% CI 52.4-72.8%) and 53.8% (95% CI 40.6-65.3%) at 10 and 15 years, respectively. Conclusions: The use of aortic homograft in acute aortic valve endocarditis is associated with a remarkably low risk of relapsing infection and very acceptable long-term survival. The risk of reoperation due to SVD is significant after one decade especially in young patients. The aortic homograft seems to be ideally suited for reconstruction of the aortic valve and cardiac structures damaged by the infective process especially in early surgery.
Endovascular Repair of One-hundred Urgent and Emergent free or Contained Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Ruptures. An International Multi-Center Trans-Atlantic experience

Paolo Spath,Nikolaos Tsilimparis,Enrico Gallitto,Daniel Becker,Andrea Vacirca,Bärbel Berekoven,Giuseppe Panuccio,Angelos Karelis,Andrea Kahlberg,Germano Melissano,Nuno Dias,Tilo Kölbel,Martin Austermann,Gianluca Faggioli,Gustavo Oderich,Mauro Gargiulo,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006231

IF: 13.787

2024-02-07

Annals of Surgery

Abstract:Objective: To analyze the outcomes of urgent/emergent endovascular aortic repair of patients with free/contained ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (rTAAA). Background: Endovascular repair of rTAAA has been scarcely described in emergent setting. Methods: An international multicenter retrospective observational study (ClinicalTrials.govID:NCT05956873) from January-2015 to January-2023 in 6 European and 1 United States Vascular Surgery Centers. Primary end-points were technical success, 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality and follow-up survival. Results: A total of 100 rTAAA patients were included (75 male; mean age 73 y). All patients (86 contained and 14 free ruptures) were symptomatic and treated within 24-hours from diagnosis: multi-branched off-the-shelf devices (Zenith t-branch,Cook Medical Inc.Bjaeverskov,Denmark) in 88 patients, physician-modified endografts in 8, patient-specific device or parallel grafts in two patients each. Primary technical success was achieved in 89 patients and 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality was 24%. Major adverse events (MAEs) occurred in 34% of patients (permanent dialysis and paraplegia in 4 and 8 patients, respectively). No statistical differences were detected in mortality rates between free and contained ruptured patients (43%vs.21%; P =0.075). Multivariate analysis revealed contained rupture favoring technical success (Odd-Ratio10.1;95%Confidence-Interval:3.0-33.6; P =<0.001). MAEs (OR9.4;95%C-I:2.8-30.5; P =<0.001) and pulmonary complications (OR11.3;95%CI:3.0-41.5; P = 80 mm (Hazard-Ratio:2.0;95%CI:1.0-30.5; P =0.037), technical failure (HR:2.6;95%CI:1.1-6.5; P =0.045) and pulmonary complications (HR:3.0;95%CI:1.2-7.9; P =0.021) were independent risk factors for follow-up mortality. Conclusion: Endovascular repair of rTAAA shows high technical success; the presence of free rupture alone appear not to correlate with early mortality. Effective prevention/management of post-operative complications is crucial for survival.

surgery
Impact of Aortic Root Abscess on Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis

Ahmed Elderia,Anna-Maria Wallau,Walid Bennour,Stephen Gerfer,Christopher Gaisendrees,Ihor Krasivskyi,Ilija Djordjevic,Thorsten Wahlers,Carolyn Weber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14010092

2024-01-08

Life

Abstract:Locally destructive infective endocarditis (IE) of the aortic valve complicated by abscess formation in the aortic root may seriously affect patients' outcomes. Surgical repair of such conditions is often challenging. This is a single-center observational analysis of consecutive patients treated surgically for IE between 2009 and 2019. We divided the cohort into two groups considering the presence of an aortic root abscess and compared the characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients accordingly. Moreover, we examined three different procedures performed in abscess patients regarding operative data and postoperative results: an isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), AVR with patch reconstruction of the aortic root (AVR + RR) or the Bentall procedure. The whole cohort comprised 665 patients, including 140 (21.0%) patients with an aortic root abscess and 525 (78.9%) as the control group. The abscess group of patients received either AVR (66.4%), AVR + RR (17.8%), or the Bentall procedure (15.7%). The mean age in the whole cohort was 62.1 ± 14.8. The mean EuroSCORE II was 8.0 ± 3.5 in the abscess group and 8.4 ± 3.7 in the control group (p = 0.259). The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 19.6% vs. 11.3% (p = 0.009) and 40.1% vs. 29.6% (p = 0.016) in the abscess compared to the control group. The multivariable regression analysis did not reveal aortic root abscess as an independent predictor of mortality. Rather, age > 60 correlated with 30-day mortality and infection with Streptococcus spp. correlated with 1-year mortality. In the analysis according to the performed procedures, KM estimates exhibited comparable long-term survival (log-rank p = 0.325). IE recurrence was noticed in 12.3% of patients after AVR, 26.7% after AVR + RR and none after Bentall (p = 0.069). We concluded that patients with an aortic root abscess suffer worse short and long-term outcomes compared to other IE patients. The post-procedural survival among ARA patients did not significantly vary based on the procedures performed.

biology
Outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated-branched endograft repair for acute aortic pathology

Salvatore T Scali,Dan Neal,Vida Sollanek,Tomas Martin,Julie Sablik,Thomas S Huber,Adam W Beck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.133

Abstract:Objective: Open surgical repair for acute aortic pathologies involving the visceral vessels is associated with morbidity and mortality rates of 40% to 70% and 30% to 60%, respectively. Due to these poor outcomes, the application of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) has been expanded in this setting; however, durability remains unknown. The purpose of this analysis was to describe outcomes after F/B-EVAR for acute aortic disease. Methods: A single center retrospective review of all F/B-EVARs for acute aortic disease was completed. Primary end points included mortality and reintervention-free survival. Secondary end points were patency and freedom from endoleak, as well as change in aneurysm diameter and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Life-tables were used to estimate end points, while mixed statistical models were used to determine aneurysm diameter change. Results: Thirty-seven patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 67 ± 10 years; 75% male) underwent F/B-EVAR for acute aortic disease, and median follow-up time was 10.3 months (range, 0.5-31.4 months). Indications included thoracoabdominal aneurysm (65%; n = 24), pararenal aneurysm (17%; n = 6), postsurgical anastomotic pseudoaneurysm (8%; n = 3), dissection (5%; n = 2), and penetrating ulcer (5%; n = 2). Mean preoperative aneurysm diameter was 7.3 ± 1.8 cm. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV or IV-E, and 38% (n = 14) had history of aortic repair. There were 105 visceral vessels revascularized (celiac, 26; superior mesenteric artery, 29; renal, 50) and 24 (65%) patients underwent three- or four-vessel repair. Technical success was 92% (n = 34), with no intraoperative deaths and one conversion (3%). Median length of stay was 6 days (range, 2-60 days), and postoperative morbidity was 41% (n = 15; spinal cord ischemia, 14% [8% permanent]; pulmonary, 14%; renal, 14%; extremity ischemia, 8%; stroke, 5%; cardiac, 3%; bleeding, 3%) with 30-day mortality of 19% (n = 7; in-hospital, 8%; n = 3). Endoleak was detected at some point in follow-up in 27% (n = 10), and a majority were type II (n = 7). Six (16%) patients underwent reintervention, and no late conversions occurred. Postoperative imaging was available in 27 (73%), and one celiac fenestration lost patency at 12 months. One-year branch vessel patency and freedom from reintervention was 98% ± 6% and 70% ± 9%, respectively. Estimated 1- and 4-year survival were 70% ± 8% and 67% ± 8%, respectively. During follow-up, aortic diameter decreased 0.5 cm (95% confidence interval, 1.1-0.2; P = .1) while estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased by 2 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Conclusions: F/B-EVAR can be performed to treat a variety of symptomatic and/or ruptured paravisceral aortic pathologies. Perioperative morbidity and mortality can be significant; however, it is less than literature-based outcomes of open repair. Short-term fenestrated/branched graft patency is excellent, but reintervention is frequent, highlighting the need for diligent follow-up. Patients surviving the initial hospitalization for F/B-EVAR of acute aortic disease can anticipate good long-term survival.
Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Infectious Aortic Aneurysms (a Report of 7 Cases)

ZHOU Too,GUO Da-qao,CHEN Bin,JINAG Jun-hao,FU Wei-guo,WANG Yu-qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6315.2008.11.030

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To summarize the therapeutic effects and feasibility of endovascular repair for infec-tious aortic aneurysms (IAA). Methods The clinical data of seven cases with IAA treated with endovascular repair between May 2006 and July 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. Results Technical success was achieved in all ca-ses. Complete exclusion of the aneurysms was proved by DSA and no endoleaks appeared. No major complications oc-curred. All patients were followed up for 8 to 22 months with no evidence of aneurysms enlargement, stent-grafts mi-gration,endoleak and infection. Conclusion Endovascular repair of infectious aortic aneurysm is a minimally inva-sire, safe and feasible technique and provides good short-term results.
Endovascular repair combined with adjunctive procedures in the treatment of tuberculous infected native aortic aneurysms

Hao He,Junwei Wang,Quanming Li,Xin Li,Ming Li,Tun Wang,Jiehua Li,Lunchang Wang,Chang Shu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.136

IF: 4.86

2022-02-01

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to analyze the experience of a single center and assess the efficacy and durability of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in patients with tuberculous infected native aortic aneurysms (INAAs).METHODS: All patients who underwent EVAR for INAAs between September 2014 and August 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary end points were 30-day and overall mortality rates; the secondary outcomes included major complications, endoleak, recurrence, reintervention rate, and thrombosis of the pseudoaneurysmal sac.RESULTS: A total of 18 patients (average age, 61.3 years; 10 female [55.6%]) were identified. Fifteen patients (83.3%) had adjunctive procedures. Both the in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 0%. The overall cumulative survival rates estimated by Kaplan-Meier were 100% at 1 and 6 months, and 92.3% at 12 and 24 months, and 80.8% at 36 and 48 months. Type Ib and II endoleaks each occurred in 1 patient (5.6%) and resolved without treatment after 1 month. No graft infections, strokes, paraplegia, ischemic abdominal complications, or other major complications occurred. The overall rates of cumulative freedom from recurrence of aneurysm and reintervention were 83.9% and 81.8%, respectively, during the median follow-up period of 28.5 months (range, 1-72 months). The median time of administering antituberculosis drugs was 10.5 months (range, 2-44 months).CONCLUSIONS: EVAR combined with oral antituberculosis medication is effective and may be an appealing treatment option for patients with high-risk INAAs. Adjunctive procedures, including targeted drug delivery to the site of infection, could be a solution to further controlling the infection, but still needs further evaluation.

surgery,peripheral vascular disease
EVAR Solution For Acutely Thrombosed Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in a Patient with COVID-19

Alessandro Robaldo,Dimitri Apostolou,Federica Persi,Enrico Peano,Massimo Maione

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2022.01.006

Abstract:Introduction: Acute thrombosis of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (ATAAA) represents an uncommon but catastrophic pathology, which can lead to life threatening complications. This is a report of the infrequent use of an endovascular solution to successfully treat ATAAA in a patient with COVID-19 viral pneumonia and ischaemia induced lower extremity neurological deficits. Report: An 89 year old white male, with a history of cardiovascular comorbidities was admitted to the emergency room with dyspnoea associated with the sudden onset of abdominal and back pain followed by partial motor and sensory deficits in both legs. The CT scan showed both an 8 cm infrarenal AAA with middle (inferior mesenteric artery patent) and distal thrombotic occlusion of the sac and non-aneurysmal but thrombosed common iliac arteries. An additional finding was imaging features typical of interstitial pneumonia. After the molecular test detected active COVID-19 infection, the patient was treated as an emergency with an aorto-uni-iliac stent graft and femorofemoral crossover graft. The post-operative course was uneventful with AAA exclusion and disappearance of ischaemic symptoms. There were no vascular complications. At three month follow up the patient remained asymptomatic and was looking after himself. Discussion: This case supports the feasibility and safety of a minimally invasive endovascular procedure to treat ATAAA in selected patients with favourable anatomy and high risk of respiratory complications in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
High-Grade Infection after Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patient with Recent COVID-19 Hospitalization

Alireza Mohseni,Alessia Di Girolamo,Rocco Cangiano,Marta Ascione,Luca di Marzo,Wassim Mansour

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14020205

IF: 3.6

2024-01-19

Diagnostics

Abstract:In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the global healthcare landscape has undergone significant transformations, particularly impacting the management of complex medical conditions such as aortic aneurysms. This study focuses on a 76-year-old female patient with a history of extensive cardiovascular surgeries, including aortic valve replacement, Bentall operation, and Frozen Elephant Trunk procedure, who presented with a type II thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm post-COVID-19 recovery. A comprehensive frailty assessment using the Modified Frailty Index and a two-phase endovascular approach for aneurysm treatment, considering the patient's frailty and complex medical history was performed. Upon successful aneurysm management, the patient's postoperative course was complicated by COVID-19 reinfection and Enterococcus faecalis superinfection, highlighting the increased risk of bacterial superinfections and the challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance in COVID-19 patients. The study underscores the necessity of vigilant postoperative surveillance and a multidisciplinary approach in managing such complex cases, highlighting the importance of personalized care strategies, integrating cardiovascular and infectious disease management, and adapting healthcare practices to the unique challenges of the pandemic. This case contributes to the evolution of knowledge on managing aortic aneurysms in the COVID-19 era, advocating for patient-centric treatment approaches and continuous research into long-term patient outcomes.

medicine, general & internal
Endovascular repair for infra-renal aortic aneurysms with supra-renal fixation endoprosthesis: Results and outcomes

Rafael de Athayde Soares,Kaline Amaro,Ana Isabel Nasser,Marcus Vinícius Martins Cury,Edson Takamitsu Nakamura,Keityane de Lima Pedrosa,Roberto Sacilotto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241264381

IF: 1.1

2024-07-20

Vascular

Abstract:Vascular, Ahead of Print. ObjectiveThe main objective of this paper is to evaluate the outcomes regarding endoleaks, reinterventions, and death related to aneurysm complications in patients submitted to endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortoiliac aneurysm (AAA) using Endurant II (Medtronic) and Zenith Flex (Cook) endografts.MethodsThis was a prospective, consecutive cohort study of patients with AAA who underwent EVAR with the use of Endurant II stent graft and Zenith Flex endograft.ResultsA total of 156 patients submitted to EVAR were evaluated. The perioperative mortality was 5.1%, 8 patients. The median clinical follow-up period was 760 ± 80 days. There were 28 patients (17.9%) submitted to urgent repair of the aneurysm (symptomatic expansion or rupture) and 128 patients (82.1%) submitted to elective repair. There were 36 cases (23.1%) of later endoleak and most of them are Type II endoleaks (21 patients, 13.4%). There were 12 cases of Type I endoleak. Moreover, regarding limb graft occlusion (LGO), there were 9 patients (5.8%). The overall survival rate in Kaplan–Meier analysis at 720 days was 84.8% in the total cohort. The freedom from reintervention rate in Kaplan–Meier analysis at 720 days was 92.7% in the total cohort. The linear regression analysis for survival rates showed that chronic kidney disease (p = .03; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.82, CI = 1.07–4.44) was the only factor related to poorer survival rates in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The linear regression analysis showed that the presence of endoleaks (p < .001, HR = 6.69, CI = 2.26–8.48) and limb graft occlusion (p < .001, HR = 8.02, CI = 1.60–9.99) were related to reintervention in both univariate and multivariate analyses.ConclusionIn this present study, supra-renal fixation endograft devices were safe and efficient in treating AAA, with satisfactory results and no renal compromise. The linear regression analysis showed that the presence of endoleaks and limb graft occlusion were related to higher reintervention rates in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

peripheral vascular disease
Aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprosthesis in case of infective endocarditis: a literature review

Antonio Piperata,Alexandre Azmoun,Armand Eker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-024-01736-3

Abstract:Purpose: Recently, the use of rapid deployment (RD) aortic valve prostheses has been introduced for the treatment of aortic valve replacement (AVR), showing excellent hemodynamic performances.According to these data, some groups have proposed new RD valves as an alternative solution in the case of infective aortic endocarditis (IAE) to reduce the use of foreign materials, and the manipulation of the annulus.The aim of this review is to report the results of early clinical experiences with the use of RD bioprostheses in the case of IAE, in order to discuss technical and clinical aspects of this emerging strategy to better elucidate its advantages and limitations as a potential therapeutic solution. Methods: An in-depth search of PubMed from January to March 2023 was performed. English-language articles were selected independently by authors following the criteria in order to consider all available experiences (full papers, case reports, and case series) that have investigated the use of RD in case of IAE. Results: The use of rapid deployment bioprosthesis represents a bailout strategy in case of severe aortic valve endocarditis and should be evaluated with caution in selected cases. This review collects the first, initial, and pioneering experiences of the use of the RD prosthesis in case of infective endocarditis, particularly when the fragility of the annular tissues precludes a secure anchoring of sutured prostheses.The reduced use of foreign materials by minimizing the number of stitches, the reduced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times, and the excellent hemodynamic performances associated with the use of RD bioprosthesis represent the most important advantages that could justify their use in the setting of aortic valve endocarditis. Conclusion: Although there are few anecdotal experiences, surgical aortic valve replacement with the use of RD represents an emerging strategy in case of aortic valve endocarditis. Its advantages, pros, and cons are under debate, and robust clinical trials are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.
Incidental finding of cor triatriatum in an asymptomatic elite athlete.

S. Basavarajaiah,D. Oxborough,Mathew G. Wilson,Sanjay Sharma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECHO.2006.11.029

IF: 7.722

2007-06-01

Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Abstract:
Outcomes Following Different Management of Mycotic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Ren Lin,Hai-Peng He,Yang Zhao,Jun-Bing Lv,Jia-Xin Peng,Heng-Hui Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241253128

2024-05-11

Abstract:Objective: The objective was to present our experience on managing mycotic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (MIAAA) through a retrospective cohort study. Methods: Data of patients with MIAAA managed in our center from July 2016 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnosis of MIAAA was made based on: (1) preoperative clinical signs of infection; (2) elevated serologic infection parameters; (3) para-aneurysmal infection features on enhanced computed tomography; and (4) positive blood or tissue cultures. All the patients received standard antibiotic therapy. Surgical management including endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), initial EVAR followed by open re-operation, and initial open surgical repair (OSR) were conducted according to disease seriosity, physical condition, and patient's will. Infection index and clinical outcome were evaluated during the follow-up time. Results: A total of 23 patients (21 men; averaged=66.3 years, range=49-79 years) were included, with a mean follow-up time of 19.9 months (range=1-75 months). Bacteria culture from blood or tissue specimen was positive in 15 patients (Salmonella, n=8; Escherichia coli, n=3; methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA], n=1; Klebsiella pneumoniae, n=1; Staphylococcus epidermidis, n=1; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, n=1). Seven patients received OSR as the initial surgical intervention, whereas 14 patients chose EVAR instead. The 2 conservatively managed patients (refused surgery) died within 30 days. The 7 patients who received initial OSR survived till now. Among the 14 patients who underwent initial EVAR, infection deteriorated without exception (14/14, 100%). Three of these patients refused re-operation and died within 6 months. Eleven patients received secondary surgical intervention (10 cases of aneurysm and endograft resection, thorough debridement, subclavian to bi-femoral artery bypass, or in situ aorta reconstruction; 1 case of laparoscopic debridement) and 7 survived the follow-up time. The overall mortality rate was 39.1% (9/23). The mortality rates differed greatly following different intervention methods (merely antibiotic management, 100%; initial open operation, 0%; initial EVAR without secondary operation, 100%; initial EVAR plus secondary operation, 36.4%). Conclusions: Open surgical repair is still the first choice for hemodynamically stable and low-risk patients. Merely EVAR is related with disastrous results, which should be reserved as a temporary alternative for patients with ruptured aneurysms, hemodynamic instability or high surgical risk, and followed by timely secondary OSR. Clinical impact: The management of mycotic or primary-infected aortic aneurysm is challenging; treatment remains controversial. Our center has reviewed our experience over the past 6 years and found that open surgical repair is still the first choice for hemodynamically stable and low-risk patients. Merely endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is related with disastrous results, which should be reserved as a temporary alternative for patients with ruptured aneurysms, hemodynamic instability or high surgical risk, and followed by timely secondary open surgical repair.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention during ST elevation myocardial infarction in prosthetic valve endocarditis: a case report

Alfonso Campanile,Guido Tavazzi,Francesco Caprioglio,Fausto Rigo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0750-3

IF: 2.174

2018-02-09

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders

Abstract:BackgroundInfective endocarditis (IE) is still a condition with high mortality and morbidity, especially in the elderly, and in patients with prosthetic valves. The concept of “time-to-therapy” plays a key role for the prompt management of IE and related complications, and the currently available multimodality imaging may play a key role in this setting. Myocardial ischemia due to extrinsic coronary compression from an aortic abscess is an extremely rare condition where the optimal therapeutic strategy has not been defined yet. We present herein the first case of a patient with ST elevation myocardial infarction caused by an aortic root abscess treated with percutaneous stent implantation.Case presentationAn 82-year-old woman with a history of atrial fibrillation, chronic renal failure, anemia and a bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement performed in 2014, was admitted to hospital with profound asthenia and a pyrexia of unknown origin. Because of high clinical suspicion of endocarditis, a trans-esophageal echocardiogram was performed. Empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy was initiated, followed by targeted treatment based on the results of blood cultures (Staphylococcus aureus). The echocardiogram did not show vegetations and the patient was managed conservatively. She suddenly deteriorated, due to an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with anterior ST segment elevation. An urgent angiogram was performed, and extrinsic compression of the left coronary system, due to an aortic root abscess, was suspected. After discussion with the surgical team, percutaneous revascularization was attempted, aiming to restore satisfactory hemodynamics, in order to plan surgery. Unfortunately, the patient rapidly developed cardiogenic shock, with multi organ failure, and died in less than 24 h.ConclusionsPatients with fever, and significant risk factors for endocarditis, who develop ACS, need a prompt diagnostic work up, including trans-esophageal echocardiography. At present, the specific timing of echocardiographic follow-up and surgical intervention is still a matter of debate, and our case aims to highlight the importance of this aspect in the management of endocarditis, in order to avoid severe complications that adversely affect patient prognosis.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems
Endovascular Management of Ascending Aortic Pathology.

Ralf R. Kolvenbach,Ron Karmeli,Lazlo S. Pinter,Yuefeng Zhu,Fan Lin,Sergej Wassiljew,Markus Meyer-Gaessner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.10.133

IF: 4.86

2011-01-01

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract:Background: Endovascular treatment of the ascending aorta is particularly challenging because of the anatomic features of this aortic segment. Only patients without connective tissue disorders, clinically relevant aortic regurgitation or stenosis, or concomitant coronary artery disease can be considered for an endovascular procedure. We report our results in a series of patients with aneurysms or intramural hematoma, penetrating ulcers, or floating thrombus who were scheduled for stent grafting.Methods: Only patients with ascending aortic pathology who were unfit for open surgery were treated with an endograft. When preoperative computed tomography imaging showed severe calcification of the aortic arch or thrombus lining, temporary clamping of the carotid arteries before wire and catheter introduction was performed. An extracorporeal bypass from the right groin to both carotid arteries with a roller pump was established and maintained during the procedure. The endograft was placed across the aortic valve into the left ventricle and deployed in a retrograde fashion. At the end of the procedure, ventriculography and, if necessary, coronary angiography was performed to rule out any damage to the left ventricle or the valve apparatus.Result: Eleven patients were scheduled for stent graft exclusion of ascending aortic pathology. In five cases because of discrepancies in length measurements and sizing, the thoracic endograft was cut to length intraoperatively after partial deployment on the operating table and reloaded to avoid covering of the innominate artery. The mean length of the ascending aorta covered was longer in aneurysm patients than in those with dissection. An 81-year-old patient presented with a type la leak. The distal landing zone in one patient was enlarged by debranching. One patient died after wire perforation of the left ventricle, and one patient sustained a cerebral stroke. Combined morbidity and mortality was 18%, and the technical success rate was 91%.Conclusions: Stem grafting of the ascending aorta is technically feasible but should be reserved for selected high-risk patients only, preferably in centers where vascular specialists cooperate closely with interventional cardiologists. Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is still the gold standard to treat ascending aortic aneurysms. Stent graft exclusion of more advanced and complex ascending aortic pathology should be performed only in centers with the necessary experience in transvalvular cardiac procedures. (J Vase Surg 2011;53:1431-8.)
Inhibiting HIV-1 infection in human T cells by lentiviral-mediated delivery of small interfering RNA against CCR5

X. Qin,D. An,I. Chen,D. Baltimore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232688199

2002-12-23

Abstract:Double-stranded RNAs ≈21 nucleotides long [small interfering RNA (siRNA)] are recognized as powerful reagents to reduce the expression of specific genes. To use them as reagents to protect cells against viral infection, effective methods for introducing siRNAs into primary cells are required. Here, we describe success in constructing a lentivirus-based vector to introduce siRNAs against the HIV-1 coreceptor, CCR5, into human peripheral blood T lymphocytes. With high-titer vector stocks, >40% of the peripheral blood T lymphocytes could be transduced, and the expression of a potent CCR5-siRNA resulted in up to 10-fold inhibition of CCR5 expression on the cell surface over a period of 2 weeks in the absence of selection. In contrast, the expression of another major HIV-1 coreceptor, CXCR4, was not affected. Importantly, blocking CCR5 expression by siRNAs provided a substantial protection for the lymphocyte populations from CCR5-tropic HIV-1 virus infection, dropping infected cells by 3- to 7-fold; only a minimal effect on infection by a CXCR4-tropic virus was observed. Thus, our studies demonstrate the feasibility and potential of lentiviral vector-mediated delivery of siRNAs as a general means of intracellular immunization for the treatment of HIV-1 and other viral diseases.
Emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation in endocarditis-associated cardiogenic shock

Iñigo Anduaga,Laura Sanchis,Marta Hernández-Meneses,Oriol de Diego,Omar Abdul-Jawad,Pedro Cepas-Guillén,Jorge Alcocer,Ander Regueiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2024.07.020

IF: 6.614

2024-07-25

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract:The standard treatment for extensive mobile vegetations and periannular complications due to infective endocarditis is surgery. However, for some patients, the surgical risk is prohibitive, particularly for those with cardiogenic shock. This report details the case of a 79-year-old male who presented in cardiogenic shock due to severe aortic regurgitation and a large mobile vegetation on the aortic valve in the setting of infective endocarditis treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

cardiac & cardiovascular systems
Endovascular repair of ascending aortic pathologies in patients unfit for open surgery: case series and literature review

Marco Ferraresi,Maria Katsarou,Alessandro Carlo Luigi Molinari,Sara Segreti,Giovanni Rossi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101455

2024-02-14

Abstract:The number of vascular centers performing endovascular repair of ascending aortic disease is constantly increasing. Accordingly to the guidelines, open surgical repair remains the gold standard for these pathologies. However, approximately one quarter of patients are deemed unfit for open surgery. In this study, we describe three cases of ascending thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) performed at our center. All the patients were deemed unfit for open surgery by the aortic team. Two patients had an ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm, and the third had a focal type A aortic dissection. In two cases, we used two abdominal aortic cuffs deployed from zone 0B to zone 0C, with no need for supra-aortic trunk debranching. In one case, we performed a "reverse" extrathoracic debranching, and we deployed a thoracic endograft from zone 0B to zone 2. Complications included one minor stroke and one inguinal hematoma. In one patient with an infected pseudoaneurysm, we performed ascending TEVAR as a bridge strategy for open repair. This patient developed a type Ia endoleak; however, clinical stabilization and infection control were obtained, and he was able to undergo heart surgery successfully. He underwent a second reintervention to treat superior mesenteric embolic occlusion. At 2 years of follow-up, all three patients were alive. Our preliminary experience demonstrates the technical feasibility and clinical appropriateness of ascending TEVAR using standard, commercially available endografts. However, no consensus has been reached regarding some critical aspects, such as the development of a standardized technique or the efficacy of the currently available devices. The improvements in graft design and the adoption of the "aortic team" approach could help in the near future to standardize the procedure, establish appropriate indications, and ensure good clinical outcomes.

Internal jugular vein cannulation: Time required under ultrasonographic guidance with a valsalva maneuver

Lack of gallium uptake in primary hepatic amyloidosis.

Infrarenal EVAR for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer: A Comparative Study with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Minimally Invasive Endovascular Repair for Nondissected Ascending Aortic Disease: A Systematic Review

Over 20 years experience with aortic homograft in aortic valve replacement during acute infective endocarditis

Endovascular Repair of One-hundred Urgent and Emergent free or Contained Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Ruptures. An International Multi-Center Trans-Atlantic experience

Impact of Aortic Root Abscess on Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis

Outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated-branched endograft repair for acute aortic pathology

Endovascular Repair for the Treatment of Infectious Aortic Aneurysms (a Report of 7 Cases)

Endovascular repair combined with adjunctive procedures in the treatment of tuberculous infected native aortic aneurysms

EVAR Solution For Acutely Thrombosed Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in a Patient with COVID-19

High-Grade Infection after Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patient with Recent COVID-19 Hospitalization

Endovascular repair for infra-renal aortic aneurysms with supra-renal fixation endoprosthesis: Results and outcomes

Aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprosthesis in case of infective endocarditis: a literature review

Incidental finding of cor triatriatum in an asymptomatic elite athlete.

Outcomes Following Different Management of Mycotic Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention during ST elevation myocardial infarction in prosthetic valve endocarditis: a case report

Endovascular Management of Ascending Aortic Pathology.

Inhibiting HIV-1 infection in human T cells by lentiviral-mediated delivery of small interfering RNA against CCR5

Emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation in endocarditis-associated cardiogenic shock

Endovascular repair of ascending aortic pathologies in patients unfit for open surgery: case series and literature review