Post Hoc Analysis Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of PrabotulinumtoxinA in Millennials and Nonmillennials With Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines

Rui Avelar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004249
2024-09-01
Abstract:Background: Millennials accept and invest in aesthetic procedures more than older generations. Objective: To compare efficacy outcomes between millennial and nonmillennial patients after treatment of glabellar lines with prabotulinumtoxinA. Materials and methods: This was a post hoc analysis of 3 Phase III studies of 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. Investigator- and/or subject-assessed positive responder rates in the Glabellar Line Scale, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale, and Subject Satisfaction Scale were compared between millennials (born 1982-2000) and nonmillennials (born ≤1981). Results: Aesthetic outcomes and subject satisfaction of prabotulinumtoxinA treatment were high in nonmillennials (n = 65) and even higher in millennials (n = 668) at all time points. At Days 7, 14, and 30 post-treatment, positive responder rates were >85% and >97% across all scales in nonmillennials and millennials, respectively, with statistical superiority observed in millennials at multiple time points in virtually all scales. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between groups. Conclusion: PrabotulinumtoxinA was highly effective in treating moderate to severe glabellar lines. The greater efficacy seen in millennials may reflect physiological differences related to aging as well as botulinum toxin-mediated effects on mood. The results align well with their aesthetic expectations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?