Abstract:Objectives: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), version 03.01, is a tool for quantitative assessment of the overall severity of dysphonia. It is based on the recordings of a sustained vowel and part of a text read aloud. For the Dutch sample, 34 syllables must be read aloud to balance the duration of the two tasks. The first part of this study thus aimed to determine how many syllables of a commonly used text in the French-speaking part of Belgium should be used to achieve the same balance. The psychometric qualities of the AVQI have been confirmed by numerous publications in various languages. However, its validation in French relies on a small cohort of patients, who were not native French speakers. Furthermore, version 03.01 of the AVQI has not yet been validated at all on French samples. Hence, the main aim of this study was to assess the criterion-related concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of the AVQI 03.01 applied to a sample of native French speakers. Methods: For the first part of this study, the optimal part of the text to be used for the AVQI was identified, taking into account both its phonemic contents and its time balance with the sustained vowel. For the validation study, 90 recordings from the University Hospital of Liège's ENT caseload database were used, as well as 30 new recordings of normophonic individuals, composing a control group. Four judges assessed the recordings using the G parameter of the GRBAS scale. Once the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the perceptual ratings was confirmed, the AVQI 03.01's criterion validity was assessed on the French sample. The diagnostic accuracy of the AVQI 03.01 in French was measured, and the cut-off score allowing for the greatest diagnostic precision determined. Results: The most appropriate syllable number of the text to be read aloud was found to be 27, in order to balance the time analyzed for both the sustained vowel and the continuous speech. Regarding the validation study, intra-rater reliability was substantial for each of the four vocologists (κmean = .778, P < 0.0001), and inter-rater reliability was high (W = .895, P < 0.0001). The Spearman correlation between the perceptual judgments and the AVQI 03.01 score was strong (rs = .84, P < 0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic-curve parameters indicated that the ideal cut-off score allowing for the highest diagnostic accuracy of the AVQI, version 03.01, applied to a French sample is 2.33, with a sensitivity of 59.8%, a specificity of 100%, an infinite positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.4. Conclusions: This study confirms the external validity of the AVQI 03.01 when applied on a French 27-syllable sample. The AVQI 03.01 is a robust, ecologically valid objective measure of overall voice quality. The cut-off score to be used is 2.33. However, clinicians should be cautious when the AVQI score is lower than 2.33. The AVQI 03.01 does not yield a sufficiently low negative likelihood ratio to be sure that this score indeed indicates normophonia. Also, taking into account the limitations regarding the perceptual judgements used in this study, a replication study should be carried out in order to confirm the cut-off score.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) to Danish

Validity and Reliability of the German Vocal Fatigue Index in Adults With Voice Disorders

Cross-Cultural Adaption and Translation of the Voice Handicap Index into Norwegian

Measuring Vocal Fatigability in Teachers: The Vocal Fatigability Scale for Teachers (VFS-T)

Validation and Development of Voice Handicap Index-Throat for Koreans

Adaptation and Validation of the Persian Version of the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10)

Adaptation and Validation of the Mandarin (Simplified) Chinese Version of the Voice Fatigue Handicap Questionnaire

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Glottal Function Index

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale for Adults

[Singing Voice Handicap Index-12 : Development and validation of a German version]

[Linguistic adaptation and validation of the voice handicap index (VHI)-30 in patients with dysphonia into Russian]

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Screening Index for Voice Disorder (SIVD-TR)

Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale-Brazil (VTDS-BR): Validation Based on Internal Consistency, Reliability, and Accuracy

Item Hierarchy of Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) in School Teachers—A Study from South India

Cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the Danish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) into Danish

Psychometric Properties of the Vocal Fatigue Handicap Questionnaire in Kannada Among Teachers

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French

Adaptation and Validation of Mandarin Chinese Version of the Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (Pvhi)

A visual analog scale for patient‐reported voice outcomes: The VAS voice

Validating the efficacy and value proposition of mental fitness vocal biomarkers in a psychiatric population: prospective cohort study