Abstract:Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is an immune-mediated inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease that has been gradually recognized in recent years and is currently considered as a distinct disease entity distinguished from multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Lately, the new diagnostic criteria for MOGAD proposed by the International MOGAD Panel were published.1 The new criteria cover six core clinical phenotypes (optic neuritis, myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, cerebral monofocal or polyfocal deficits, brainstem or cerebellar deficits, and cerebral cortical encephalitis often with seizures), emphasize the positive serum MOG-immunoglobulin G (IgG) test (determined using cell-based assay) and exclusion of alternative causes, and include supporting clinical/neuroimaging features to offset possible deficiencies in antibody detection, aiming to provide precise diagnosis of MOGAD and avoid overdiagnosis. MOGAD, with diverse clinico-radiological manifestations, is deemed to be the “great mimic”. While the new diagnostic criteria may be relatively strict in clinical practice, we are concerned that some patients suffering from MOGAD may be omitted according to the current standards. For instance, some patients, who clearly tested positive for serum MOG-IgG, presented with fever, headache, and leptomeningeal enhancement on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this clinical setting, MOG antibody-associated aseptic meningitis is the most reasonable diagnosis.2, 3 However, these patients are unlikely to be diagnosed with MOGAD according to the new criteria, given that meningitis does not fit into any of the six defined phenotype classifications. In another scenario, a few patients with seizures (a relatively common presentation in MOGAD4) may have normal brain MRI (especially at the disease onset),5 and may not sufficiently fulfil the new criteria, which can affect the early diagnosis of MOGAD, thus delaying immunotherapy. In addition, short segment myelitis (SSM, < 3 contiguous vertebral segments in length) is not uncommon in MOGAD. Ciron et al. evaluated 73 patients with MOGAD and found 28 (38.4%) had short lesions and 45 (61.6%) had long lesions at the first episode of myelitis.6 Moreover, the occurrence of conus medullaris involvement varied in different populations, which seems to be more uncommon in patients presenting in China (2/59 [3.4%]7), than those in Europe (22/73 [30.1%]6) and North America (21/51 [41.2%]8). Similarly, in our center with recent 5-year data, conus medullaris injury was observed in 2/17 [11.8%] cases with myelitis as the onset manifestation. SSM, with eccentric lesions and without conus medullaris involvement, can occur with low positive serum MOG-IgG. These patients would also fail to meet with the current criteria, but their clinical findings may still be relevant to MOG-IgG. Furthermore, MOG-IgG associated myelitis with negative initial spinal cord MRI occurred in 7/73 patients with MOGAD.9 For the patients with MRI-negative myelitis, if detected with low positive serum MOG-IgG, also challenge the diagnosis of MOGAD according to the new criteria, which may lead to the therapeutic dilemma. Moving forward, detailed studies of MOGAD are likely to identify additional clinico-radiological phenotypes, and the frequency of existing phenotypes will also change, and the diagnostic criteria need to be revised and updated with the times. Although there is still room for improvement, the publication of the 2023 criteria is a key step towards unifying and standardizing the diagnosis of MOGAD, pushing its research into a new era. We expect that the next version of MOGAD criteria will include the uncommon clinical phenotypes, which would allow clinicians to be more vigilant in identifying patients with MOGAD that are presenting with atypical manifestations. Furthermore, we suggest it would be beneficial to define levels of diagnostic certainty (such as possible/probable/definite MOGAD), similar to the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. We believe that these approaches may be more advantageous in clinical diagnosis and management strategies, compensating for lower sensitivity from the current strict diagnostic criteria in the pursuit of higher specificity, so as to decrease underdiagnosis. Given that MOGAD is a treatable disease, but therapeutic regimens are still different from those for other inflammatory CNS diseases, early identification can facilitate timely and optimal treatment, thus improving the prognosis. Not applicable. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Not applicable. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Clinical practice guidelines for multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease 2023 in Japan

Clinical practice guidelines of the Japan Research Committee of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare for Intractable Vasculitis for the management of microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis: The 2023 update - secondary publication

The clinical practice guideline for the management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Japan-update 2023

Seeking ideal clinical guidelines for myasthenia gravis

Consensus Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: 2023 revision of The MENACTRIMS Guidelines

Outlines of the Japanese guidelines for the management of primary cutaneous lymphomas 2020

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in Japan 2023: Executive Summary

Systematic review and meta-analysis for the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer, 2022 Edition: changes from the 2018 edition and general statements on breast cancer treatment

Drug treatment algorithm and recommendations from the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication

Criteria for Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody‐associated Disease: Balancing Underdiagnosis with Overdiagnosis

Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2

Real-world clinical decisions of physicians in the management of Takayasu arteritis and giant cell arteritis in Japan: A cross-sectional web questionnaire survey

Guideline for Gynecological Practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2020 edition

The Japan Glaucoma Society guidelines for glaucoma 5th edition

Japanese guidelines for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 2023:Revised edition

Japanese pediatric guidelines for the treatment and management of bronchial asthma 2008

Japanese rapid/living recommendations on drug management for COVID‐19: updated guidelines (September 2021)

Dynamic changes in patient admission and their disabilities in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica: A Japanese nationwide administrative data study

Systematic review for the treatment of older rheumatoid arthritis patients informing the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

Treatment of MOG Antibody Associated Disorders: Results of an International Survey