Abstract:Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is an immune-mediated inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disease that has been gradually recognized in recent years and is currently considered as a distinct disease entity distinguished from multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Lately, the new diagnostic criteria for MOGAD proposed by the International MOGAD Panel were published.1 The new criteria cover six core clinical phenotypes (optic neuritis, myelitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, cerebral monofocal or polyfocal deficits, brainstem or cerebellar deficits, and cerebral cortical encephalitis often with seizures), emphasize the positive serum MOG-immunoglobulin G (IgG) test (determined using cell-based assay) and exclusion of alternative causes, and include supporting clinical/neuroimaging features to offset possible deficiencies in antibody detection, aiming to provide precise diagnosis of MOGAD and avoid overdiagnosis. MOGAD, with diverse clinico-radiological manifestations, is deemed to be the “great mimic”. While the new diagnostic criteria may be relatively strict in clinical practice, we are concerned that some patients suffering from MOGAD may be omitted according to the current standards. For instance, some patients, who clearly tested positive for serum MOG-IgG, presented with fever, headache, and leptomeningeal enhancement on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this clinical setting, MOG antibody-associated aseptic meningitis is the most reasonable diagnosis.2, 3 However, these patients are unlikely to be diagnosed with MOGAD according to the new criteria, given that meningitis does not fit into any of the six defined phenotype classifications. In another scenario, a few patients with seizures (a relatively common presentation in MOGAD4) may have normal brain MRI (especially at the disease onset),5 and may not sufficiently fulfil the new criteria, which can affect the early diagnosis of MOGAD, thus delaying immunotherapy. In addition, short segment myelitis (SSM, < 3 contiguous vertebral segments in length) is not uncommon in MOGAD. Ciron et al. evaluated 73 patients with MOGAD and found 28 (38.4%) had short lesions and 45 (61.6%) had long lesions at the first episode of myelitis.6 Moreover, the occurrence of conus medullaris involvement varied in different populations, which seems to be more uncommon in patients presenting in China (2/59 [3.4%]7), than those in Europe (22/73 [30.1%]6) and North America (21/51 [41.2%]8). Similarly, in our center with recent 5-year data, conus medullaris injury was observed in 2/17 [11.8%] cases with myelitis as the onset manifestation. SSM, with eccentric lesions and without conus medullaris involvement, can occur with low positive serum MOG-IgG. These patients would also fail to meet with the current criteria, but their clinical findings may still be relevant to MOG-IgG. Furthermore, MOG-IgG associated myelitis with negative initial spinal cord MRI occurred in 7/73 patients with MOGAD.9 For the patients with MRI-negative myelitis, if detected with low positive serum MOG-IgG, also challenge the diagnosis of MOGAD according to the new criteria, which may lead to the therapeutic dilemma. Moving forward, detailed studies of MOGAD are likely to identify additional clinico-radiological phenotypes, and the frequency of existing phenotypes will also change, and the diagnostic criteria need to be revised and updated with the times. Although there is still room for improvement, the publication of the 2023 criteria is a key step towards unifying and standardizing the diagnosis of MOGAD, pushing its research into a new era. We expect that the next version of MOGAD criteria will include the uncommon clinical phenotypes, which would allow clinicians to be more vigilant in identifying patients with MOGAD that are presenting with atypical manifestations. Furthermore, we suggest it would be beneficial to define levels of diagnostic certainty (such as possible/probable/definite MOGAD), similar to the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. We believe that these approaches may be more advantageous in clinical diagnosis and management strategies, compensating for lower sensitivity from the current strict diagnostic criteria in the pursuit of higher specificity, so as to decrease underdiagnosis. Given that MOGAD is a treatable disease, but therapeutic regimens are still different from those for other inflammatory CNS diseases, early identification can facilitate timely and optimal treatment, thus improving the prognosis. Not applicable. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Not applicable. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Criteria for Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody‐associated Disease: Balancing Underdiagnosis with Overdiagnosis