Abstract:Background Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) is a standard for stratifying high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. In CEUS LI-RADS version 2017, the CEUS features are evaluated using pure-blood pool contrast agent, which might be inapplicable to perfluorobutane contrast agent in terms of Kupffer phase defect. Purpose This study aims to summarize and compare diagnostic performance of classical with modified CEUS LI-RADS using perfluorobutane by integrating published data and our original study data from three medical centers. Methods • PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science were searched up to 31 August, 2023, observational (retrospective or prospective) or clinical trials of perfluorobutane contrast agent in diagnosing HCC in high-risk patients were included. • Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used. • Comparison between classical and modified CEUS LI-RADS with perfluorobutane were performed by ranking of diagnostic odds ratio and superiority index using an ANOVA arm-based model. • PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023461549. Key Results Nine studies plus our original data were included in this meta-analysis, relating to 1662 patients with 1779 lesions. 1. The summarized sensitivity of modified CEUS LI-RADS was higher than classical CEUS LI-RADS (0.77[0.72-0.81] vs. 0.7[0.63-0.76]). 2. The general diagnostic performance of modified CEUS LI-RADS was superior than classical CEUS LI-RADS with a higher diagnostic odds ratio (16.98[11.65,23.43] vs. 12.51[8.11,18.44]) and higher superiority index (1.59[1.00,3.00] vs. 0.80[0.33,1.00]). Conclusions Modified CEUS LI-RADS using perfluorobutane contrast agent embraces better diagnostic performance with higher sensitivity without compromising specificity in high-risk HCC patients. Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) is a standard for stratifying high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. In CEUS LI-RADS version 2017, the CEUS features are evaluated using pure-blood pool contrast agent, which might be inapplicable to perfluorobutane contrast agent in terms of Kupffer phase defect. This study aims to summarize and compare diagnostic performance of classical with modified CEUS LI-RADS using perfluorobutane by integrating published data and our original study data from three medical centers. • PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and Web of Science were searched up to 31 August, 2023, observational (retrospective or prospective) or clinical trials of perfluorobutane contrast agent in diagnosing HCC in high-risk patients were included. • Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used. • Comparison between classical and modified CEUS LI-RADS with perfluorobutane were performed by ranking of diagnostic odds ratio and superiority index using an ANOVA arm-based model. • PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023461549. Nine studies plus our original data were included in this meta-analysis, relating to 1662 patients with 1779 lesions. 1. The summarized sensitivity of modified CEUS LI-RADS was higher than classical CEUS LI-RADS (0.77[0.72-0.81] vs. 0.7[0.63-0.76]). 2. The general diagnostic performance of modified CEUS LI-RADS was superior than classical CEUS LI-RADS with a higher diagnostic odds ratio (16.98[11.65,23.43] vs. 12.51[8.11,18.44]) and higher superiority index (1.59[1.00,3.00] vs. 0.80[0.33,1.00]). Modified CEUS LI-RADS using perfluorobutane contrast agent embraces better diagnostic performance with higher sensitivity without compromising specificity in high-risk HCC patients.

CEUS LI-RADS in Combination With the Serum Biomarker-Based ASAP Model Improves the Diagnostic Performance of HCC in High-Risk Patients

Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding the Article "Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement" by Zhou and Collaborators

The Value of CEUS LI-RADS Combined with AFP in Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Low- and High-Risk Patients

[Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessing the High-Risk Population of Hepatic Malignant Tumor].

Comparison Between ACR CEUS LI-RADS and WFUMB-EFSUMB for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Patients

DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CLASSICAL/MODIFIED CEUS LI-RADS WITH PERFLUOROBUTANE CONTRAST AGENT IN HIGH-RISK HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

Interobserver and inter-modalities agreement of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system(CEUS LI-RADS) and magnetic resonance imaging liver imaging reporting and data system(MRI LI-RADS) for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients

CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS in Association with Serum Biomarkers for Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma from Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The efficacy of modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) using Sonazoid in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic value of liver imaging reporting and data system for hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in association with serum biomarkers for differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Real-life assessment of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and CEUS algorithms (CEUS LI-RADS®/ESCULAP) in hepatic nodules in cirrhotic patients—a prospective multicenter study

Clinical impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on indeterminate or non-characterizable liver nodules on CT/MRI: sub-analysis from a prospective multicenter trial

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system v2017: patient outcomes after treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with category 3-5 and category M

Clinical Application of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for Characterizing Liver Neoplasms: A Meta-Analysis

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: can we use contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to predict the patient’s survival?

Evaluation of the Time Difference Method in Identifying Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Current CEUS LR-M Category Nodules

The comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI LI-RADS for nodules ≤2 cm in patients at high risk for HCC: a prospective study

Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS

Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta‐analysis