Abstract:Background: Federated learning (FL) is a newly proposed machine-learning method that uses a decentralized dataset. Since data transfer is not necessary for the learning process in FL, there is a significant advantage in protecting personal privacy. Therefore, many studies are being actively conducted in the applications of FL for diverse areas. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and performance of FL using three benchmark datasets, including a clinical benchmark dataset. Methods: To evaluate FL in a realistic setting, we implemented FL using a client-server architecture with Python. The implemented client-server version of the FL software was deployed to Amazon Web Services. Modified National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST), Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III), and electrocardiogram (ECG) datasets were used to evaluate the performance of FL. To test FL in a realistic setting, the MNIST dataset was split into 10 different clients, with one digit for each client. In addition, we conducted four different experiments according to basic, imbalanced, skewed, and a combination of imbalanced and skewed data distributions. We also compared the performance of FL to that of the state-of-the-art method with respect to in-hospital mortality using the MIMIC-III dataset. Likewise, we conducted experiments comparing basic and imbalanced data distributions using MIMIC-III and ECG data. Results: FL on the basic MNIST dataset with 10 clients achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.997 and an F1-score of 0.946. The experiment with the imbalanced MNIST dataset achieved an AUROC of 0.995 and an F1-score of 0.921. The experiment with the skewed MNIST dataset achieved an AUROC of 0.992 and an F1-score of 0.905. Finally, the combined imbalanced and skewed experiment achieved an AUROC of 0.990 and an F1-score of 0.891. The basic FL on in-hospital mortality using MIMIC-III data achieved an AUROC of 0.850 and an F1-score of 0.944, while the experiment with the imbalanced MIMIC-III dataset achieved an AUROC of 0.850 and an F1-score of 0.943. For ECG classification, the basic FL achieved an AUROC of 0.938 and an F1-score of 0.807, and the imbalanced ECG dataset achieved an AUROC of 0.943 and an F1-score of 0.807. Conclusions: FL demonstrated comparative performance on different benchmark datasets. In addition, FL demonstrated reliable performance in cases where the distribution was imbalanced, skewed, and extreme, reflecting the real-life scenario in which data distributions from various hospitals are different. FL can achieve high performance while maintaining privacy protection because there is no requirement to centralize the data.

A Comparative Analysis of Federated and Centralized Learning for SpO2 Prediction in Five Critical Care Databases

A Federated Learning Framework Via Decentralized Data Valuation for Chronic Disease Healthcare

Federated Learning in Multi-Center Critical Care Research: A Systematic Case Study using the eICU Database

FLICU: A Federated Learning Workflow for Intensive Care Unit Mortality Prediction

Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19

Federated Learning of Electronic Health Records Improves Mortality Prediction in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19.

Early prediction of the risk of ICU mortality with Deep Federated Learning

A Comparative Study of Federated Learning Models for COVID-19 Detection

ECG Data Security and Privacy: Leveraging Federated Learning for Better Classification

Federated Learning on Clinical Benchmark Data: Performance Assessment

Federated Learning used for predicting outcomes in SARS-COV-2 patients

A Fog-Based Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning System for Smart Healthcare Applications

Patient Clustering Improves Efficiency of Federated Machine Learning to predict mortality and hospital stay time using distributed Electronic Medical Records

On the Impact of Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning Environments with Application to Healthcare Networks

Federated Learning of Predictive Models from Federated Electronic Health Records

Predicting Abnormalities in Laboratory Values of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit Using Different Deep Learning Models: Comparative Study

FADL:Federated-Autonomous Deep Learning for Distributed Electronic Health Record

Recent Methodological Advances in Federated Learning for Healthcare

Application of federated learning techniques for arrhythmia classification using 12-lead ECG signals

Federated clustered multi-domain learning for health monitoring