Abstract:Responding to climate change and avoiding irreversible climate tipping points requires radical and drastic action by 2030. This urgency raises serious questions for energy companies, one of the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases (GHGs), in terms of how they frame, and reframe, their response to climate change. Despite the majority of energy companies releasing ambitious statements declaring net zero carbon ambitions, this 'talk' has not been matched with sufficient urgency or substantive climate action. To unpack the disconnect between talk and action, this paper draws on the literature on framing, organisational hypocrisy, and collective moral responsibility. We conduct a longitudinal qualitative content analysis of the framing of climate change used by the ten largest European investor-owned energy companies and the actions they have taken to shift their business practices. Our findings reveal three main categories of energy companies: (i) deflecting, (ii) stagnating, and (iii) evolving. We show key differences in the relationship between framing and action over time for each category, revealing how deflecting companies have larger and persistent gaps between green talk and concrete action and how stagnating companies are delaying action despite increased green talk, while evolving companies exhibit a closer link between talk and action that tends to be realised over time. Our analysis reveals how competing approaches to framing collective moral responsibility help understand the trajectories of talk and action across the different categories of energy companies. This research makes several contributions to the literature on organisational hypocrisy and collective moral responsibility in the context of climate change. Our analysis highlights the complex relationship between collective moral responsibility, organisational hypocrisy and climate action, revealing how different collective framings—diffuse, teleological, or agential—can both enable and offset substantive climate action. The study also enriches our understanding of the performative nature of collective moral responsibility by examining its temporal dimensions and showing how an agential, backward-looking focus is associated with more meaningful climate action.

Building a new environmentalism: News media access and framing in Canada's environmental movement

Frame Alignment and Environmental Advocacy: the Influence of NGO Strategies on Policy Outcomes in China

From Fake News to Echo-Chambers: On The Limitations of New Media for Environmental Activism in Australia, and “Activist-Responsive Adaptation”

Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014

New approaches to understanding the role of the news media in the formation of public attitudes and behaviours on climate change

New Media Activism and Politics of Ecology in the People’s Republic of China

Fracking and Framing: A Comparative Analysis of Media Coverage of Hydraulic Fracturing in Canadian and US Newspapers

Climate journalism in a changing media ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world

Canadian environmental diplomacy and the organizing principles of globalization

Framing effects on sustainable behavior

Complex Problems and Media Norms: Understanding Coastal Development and Ecological Impacts in Florida Through Discourse Analysis

Ecological Civilization: A Blindspot in Global Media Coverage of China’s Environmental Governance

Framing Climate Change: A Content Analysis Of Chinese Mainstream Newspapers From 2005 To 2015

Framing Collective Moral Responsibility for Climate Change: A Longitudinal Frame Analysis of Energy Company Climate Reporting

Engaging Youth to Explore Activism: An Educational Framework for Supporting an Ecological Justice-Oriented Citizenry

Media education and the limits of “literacy”: Ecological orientations to performative platforms

Greenwashing Consumption: The Didactic Framing of ExxonMobil's Energy Solutions

Student Engagement and Environmental Awareness

Reaching Science Skeptics: How Adaptive Framing of Climate Change Leads to Positive Responses Via Persuasion Knowledge and Perceived Behavioral Control

Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse

Mediated climate rift society: articulation and metabolic rift theories in analyzing climate change news in South Africa