Abstract:Background Although high-throughput genotyping arrays have made whole-genome association studies (WGAS) feasible, only a small proportion of SNPs in the human genome are actually surveyed in such studies. In addition, various SNP arrays assay different sets of SNPs, which leads to challenges in comparing results and merging data for meta-analyses. Genome-wide imputation of untyped markers allows us to address these issues in a direct fashion. Methods 384 Caucasian American liver donors were genotyped using Illumina 650Y (Ilmn650Y) arrays, from which we also derived genotypes from the Ilmn317K array. On these data, we compared two imputation methods: MACH and BEAGLE. We imputed 2.5 million HapMap Release22 SNPs, and conducted GWAS on ~40,000 liver mRNA expression traits (eQTL analysis). In addition, 200 Caucasian American and 200 African American subjects were genotyped using the Affymetrix 500 K array plus a custom 164 K fill-in chip. We then imputed the HapMap SNPs and quantified the accuracy by randomly masking observed SNPs. Results MACH and BEAGLE perform similarly with respect to imputation accuracy. The Ilmn650Y results in excellent imputation performance, and it outperforms Affx500K or Ilmn317K sets. For Caucasian Americans, 90% of the HapMap SNPs were imputed at 98% accuracy. As expected, imputation of poorly tagged SNPs (untyped SNPs in weak LD with typed markers) was not as successful. It was more challenging to impute genotypes in the African American population, given (1) shorter LD blocks and (2) admixture with Caucasian populations in this population. To address issue (2), we pooled HapMap CEU and YRI data as an imputation reference set, which greatly improved overall performance. The approximate 40,000 phenotypes scored in these populations provide a path to determine empirically how the power to detect associations is affected by the imputation procedures. That is, at a fixed false discovery rate, the number of cis-eQTL discoveries detected by various methods can be interpreted as their relative statistical power in the GWAS. In this study, we find that imputation offer modest additional power (by 4%) on top of either Ilmn317K or Ilmn650Y, much less than the power gain from Ilmn317K to Ilmn650Y (13%). Conclusion Current algorithms can accurately impute genotypes for untyped markers, which enables researchers to pool data between studies conducted using different SNP sets. While genotyping itself results in a small error rate (e.g. 0.5%), imputing genotypes is surprisingly accurate. We found that dense marker sets (e.g. Ilmn650Y) outperform sparser ones (e.g. Ilmn317K) in terms of imputation yield and accuracy. We also noticed it was harder to impute genotypes for African American samples, partially due to population admixture, although using a pooled reference boosts performance. Interestingly, GWAS carried out using imputed genotypes only slightly increased power on top of assayed SNPs. The reason is likely due to adding more markers via imputation only results in modest gain in genetic coverage, but worsens the multiple testing penalties. Furthermore, cis-eQTL mapping using dense SNP set derived from imputation achieves great resolution, and locate associate peak closer to causal variants than conventional approach.

Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations

High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection

Integration of Ssgwas and ROH Analyses for Uncovering Genetic Variants Associated with Reproduction Traits in Large White Pigs.

The effect of high-density genotypic data and different methods on joint genomic prediction: A case study in large white pigs

Accuracy of genome-wide imputation of untyped markers and impacts on statistical power for association studies

The Construction of a Haplotype Reference Panel Using Extremely Low Coverage Whole Genome Sequences and Its Application in Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction in Duroc Pigs.

Improving GWAS discovery and genomic prediction accuracy in biobank data

Strategies for Obtaining and Pruning Imputed Whole-Genome Sequence Data for Genomic Prediction

Improving lodgepole pine genomic evaluation using spatial correlation structure and SNP selection with single-step GBLUP

GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values

Fast and Accurate Approximation to Significance Tests in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs

Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction

Improving the accuracy of whole genome prediction for complex traits using the results of genome wide association studies.

A New Method for Estimating Effect Size Distribution and Heritability from Genome-Wide Association Summary Results.

Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets

Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP: an Iterative Approach for Accurate Calculation of Breeding Values and SNP Effects

Family-Based Association Tests for Genomewide Association Scans

A method to obtain exact single-step GBLUP for non-genotyped descendants when the genomic relationship matrix of ancestors is not available

Improvement of Genomic Prediction by Integrating Additional Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Selected from Imputed Whole Genome Sequencing Data.

Integrating large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies improve the genomic prediction accuracy for combined pig populations