Abstract:The novel robot-assisted (RA) technique has been utilized increasingly to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. Although the clinical application of the RA technique has been investigated in several case series and comparative studies, the superiority and safety of RA over conventional freehand (FH) methods remain controversial. Meanwhile, the intra-pedicular accuracy of the two methods has not been compared for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. This study aimed to compare the rate and risk factors of intra-pedicular accuracy of RA versus the conventional FH approach for posterior pedicle screw placement in cervical traumatic diseases. A total of 52 patients with cervical traumatic diseases who received cervical screw placement using RA (26 patients) and FH (26 patients) techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the intra-pedicular accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement according to the Gertzbin–Robbins scale. Secondary outcome parameters included surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Moreover, the risk factors that possibly affected intra-pedicular accuracy were assessed using univariate analyses. Out of 52 screws inserted using the RA method, 43 screws (82.7%) were classified as grade A, with the remaining 7 (13.5%) and 2 (3.8%) screws classified as grades B and C. In the FH cohort, 60.8% of the 79 screws were graded A, with the remaining screws graded B (21, 26.6%), C (8, 10.1%), and D (2, 2.5%). The RA technique showed a significantly higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy than the FH method ( P = 0.008), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinically acceptable accuracy ( P = 0.161). Besides, the RA technique showed remarkably longer surgery time, less postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent intraoperative blood loss and complications than the FH technique. Furthermore, the univariate analyses showed that severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P = 0.003) and shorter width of the lateral mass at the inferior margin of the posterior arch ( P = 0.014) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C1 screw placement. The diagnosis of HRVA ( P < 0.001), severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P < 0.001), short pedicle width ( P < 0.001), and short pedicle height ( P < 0.001) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C2 screw placement. RA cervical pedicle screw placement was associated with a higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy to the FH technique for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. The severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane independently contributed to high rates of the inaccuracy of C1 and C2 screw placements. RA pedicle screw placement is safe and useful for cervical traumatic surgery.

Pedicle screw placement in the cervical vertebrae using augmented reality-head mounted displays: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study

A cadaveric precision and accuracy analysis of augmented reality-mediated percutaneous pedicle implant insertion

A Pilot Human Cadaveric Study on Accuracy of the Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation System for Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Using a New Intraoperative Rapid Registration Method

Accuracy of augmented reality surgical navigation for minimally invasive pedicle screw insertion in the thoracic and lumbar spine with a new tracking device

Pedicle Screw Placement with Augmented Reality Versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Feasibility of mixed reality–based intraoperative three-dimensional image-guided navigation for atlanto-axial pedicle screw placement

Real-Time Navigation with Guide Template for Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Device: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Accuracy of augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: a systematic review

The applied study of virtual-reality technology for accurate placement of C2 pedicle screws

Fully automated determination of robotic pedicle screw accuracy and precision utilizing computer vision algorithms

1067 Accuracy of an Augmented Reality Spine Surgery Guidance System With Stereoscopic Targeting Head Mounted Display Compared to Standard Computer Navigation, Robotic Systems, and Existing AR Systems

Robot-Assisted Lumbar Pedicle Screw Placement Based on 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Cirq® robotic assistance for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement - feasibility, accuracy, and safety

Feasibility and safety report on robotic assistance for cervical pedicle screw fixation: a cadaveric study

Level-specific Comparison of 3D Navigated and Robotic Arm-Guided Screw Placement: An Accuracy Assessment of 1210 Pedicle Screws in Lumbar Surgery

Augmenting Reality in Spinal Surgery: A Narrative Review of Augmented Reality Applications in Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

Mixed reality for spine surgery: a step into the future with a human cadaveric accuracy study

An Integrated 3-Dimentional Navigation System Increases the Accuracy, Efficiency, and Safety of Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Approaches: A Randomized Cadaveric Study

First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement

Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods