Coupling of slow oscillations in prefrontal and motor cortex predicts onset of spindle trains and persistent memory reactivations

David Darevsky,Jaekyung Kim,Karunesh Ganguly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0621-24.2024
2024-08-21
Abstract:Sleep is known to drive the consolidation of motor memories. During non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, the close temporal proximity between slow oscillations (SOs) and spindles ('nesting' of SO-spindles) is known to be essential for consolidation, likely because it is closely associated with the reactivation of awake task activity. Interestingly, recent work has found that spindles can occur in temporal clusters or 'trains.' However, it remains unclear how spindle trains are related to the nesting phenomenon. Here, we hypothesized that spindle trains are more likely when SOs co-occur in prefrontal and motor cortex. We conducted simultaneous neural recordings in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and primary motor cortex (M1) of male rats training on the reach-to-grasp motor task. We found that intra-cortically recorded M1 spindles are organized into distinct temporal clusters. Notably, the occurrence of temporally precise SOs between mPFC and M1 was a strong predictor of spindle trains. Moreover, reactivation of awake task patterns is much more persistent during spindle trains in comparison to isolated spindles. Together, our work suggests that the precise coupling of SOs across mPFC and M1 may be a potential driver of spindle trains and persistent reactivation of motor memory during NREM sleep.Impact Statement Our analysis revealed two distinct temporal clusters of sleep spindles in primary motor cortex-train spindles (which are spaced closely together in time) and isolated spindles (which do not have neighboring sleep spindles). Train spindles were distinct from isolated spindles exhibiting stronger M1 SO locking and increased M1 SO-spindle nesting. Moreover, we showed that coupling between mPFC-M1 SOs influenced generation of M1 train spindles and strongly correlated with increased degrees of M1 SO-spindle nesting. In fact, we found that spindle trains themselves were especially enriched in close mPFC-M1 SO locking which coincided with enhanced M1 SO-locked spiking modulation. Finally, we demonstrated that train spindles were privileged windows for sustained task-related memory reactivation. These phenomena suggest key mechanisms through which cross-area SO propagation drives entrainment of M1 spindle trains thus supporting sensorimotor learning via sustained memory reactivations in M1. More broadly, this work advances our understanding of how global activity during sleep assists in localized consolidation of task-specific memories.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?